• Wayne MelvilleEmail author
  • Anthony Bartley
  • Xavier Fazio


This article considers the impact of scaffolding on pre-service science teachers’ constitution of identities as teachers of inquiry. This scaffolding has consisted of 2 major components, a unit on current electricity which encompasses the inquiry continuum and an open inquiry which is situated in context of classroom practice. Our analysis indicates 2 major themes. The first is the importance of scaffolding inquiry as a strategy for engaging in the discourses, experiences, and emotions that are foundational to the constitution of identity from the post-structural perspective. The second theme is that the opportunity to conduct an open inquiry, while concurrently considering its pedagogical implications, provides our pre-service teachers with an appreciation of the value of inquiry.


inquiry pre-service teachers scaffolding 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bell, R. L., Smetana, L. & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction. The Science Teacher, 72(7), 30–33.Google Scholar
  2. Bencze, J. L., Bowen, G. M. & Alsop, S. (2006). Teachers’ tendencies to promote student-led science projects: Associations with their views about science. Science Education, 90(3), 400–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Britzman, D. P. (2003). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Original work published 1990.Google Scholar
  4. Collins, A., Brown, J. S. & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  5. Connelly, F. M. & Clandinin, D. J. (Eds.). (1999). Shaping a professional identity. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  6. Czarniawska, B. (2004). Narrative in social science research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, E. A., Petish, D. & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 607–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duschl, R. A. & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38(1), 39–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Franzak, J. K. (2002). Developing a teacher identity: The impact of critical friends practice on the student teacher. English Education, 34(4), 258–280.Google Scholar
  11. Furtak, E. M. (2006). The problem with answers: An exploration of guided scientific inquiry teaching. Science Education, 90(3), 453–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Harris, K., Jensz, F. & Baldwin, G. (2005). Who’s teaching science? Meeting the demand for qualified for science teachers in Australian secondary schools. Retrieved 3 October, 2008 from'sTeachingScience.pdf.
  14. Helms, J. V. (1998). Science-and me: Subject matter and identity in secondary school science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(7), 811–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Herrenkohl, L., Palincsar, A., DeWater, L. & Kawasaki, K. (1999). Developing scientific communities in classrooms: A sociocognitive approach. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3&4), 451–494.Google Scholar
  16. Herron, M. D. (1971). The nature of scientific enquiry. School Review, 79(2), 171–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huberman, M. (1992). Teacher development and instructional mastery. In A. Hargreaves & M. Fullan (Eds.), Understanding teacher development (pp. 122–142). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  18. Johnston, A. (2008). Demythologizing or dehumanizing? A response to Settlage and the ideals of open inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(1), 11–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Keys, C. W. & Bryan, L. A. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 631–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Luehmann, A. L. (2007). Identity development as a lens to science teacher preparation. Science Education, 91(5), 822–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maclure, M. (1993). Arguing for yourself: Identity as an organising principle in teachers’ jobs and lives. British Educational Research Journal, 19(4), 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Melville, W. & Bartley, A. (2010). Mentoring and community: Inquiry as stance and science as inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 32(6), 807–828.Google Scholar
  23. Melville, W., Fazio, X., Bartley, A. & Jones, D. (2008). Inquiry experience and reflection: Pre-service teachers’ capacity for teaching inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(5), 477–494.Google Scholar
  24. Mule, L. (2006). Pre-service teachers’ inquiry in a professional development school context: Implications for the practicum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(2), 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. National Research Council (1996). The national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  26. National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  27. Ontario College of Teachers (2006). Standards of practice for the teaching profession. Available at:
  28. Ontario Ministry of Education (2008). The Ontario curriculum, grades 9 and 10, science. Toronto, ON: Queens Printer for Ontario. Available at:
  29. Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. In J. A. Hatch & R. Wisniewski (Eds.), Life, history and narrative (pp. 5–24). London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  31. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W. & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Towards a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rezba, R. J., Auldridge, T. & Rhea, L. (1999). Teaching & learning the basic science skills. Available online at:
  33. Roth, W.-M. & Duit, R. (2003). Emergence, flexibility, and stabilisation of language in the physics classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(9), 869–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ryder, J., Leach, J. & Driver, R. (1999). Undergraduate science students’ images of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(2), 201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of inquiry. In J. J. Schwab & P. F. Brandwein (Eds.), The teaching of science (pp. 3–103). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Settlage, J. (2007). Demythologizing science teacher education: Conquering the false ideal of open inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(4), 461–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sfard, A. & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytical tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tytler, R. (2007). Re-imagining science education: Engaging students in science for Australia’s future. Camberwell, VIC, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  39. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. White, R. T. (1988). Learning science. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  41. Windschitl, M. (2002). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87(1), 112–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Windschitl, M. (2006). Why can’t we talk to one another about science education reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(5), 348–355.Google Scholar
  43. Wood, D., Bruner, J. & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 17, 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zembylas, M. (2003). Emotions and teacher identity: A poststructural perspective. Teachers and teaching: Theory and practice, 9, 213–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationLakehead UniversityThunder BayCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationBrock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada

Personalised recommendations