Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

TESTING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MATHEMATICAL GAMES AS A PEDAGOGICAL TOOL FOR CHILDREN’S LEARNING

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In an effort to engage children in mathematics learning, many primary teachers use mathematical games and activities. Games have been employed for drill and practice, warm-up activities and rewards. The effectiveness of games as a pedagogical tool requires further examination if games are to be employed for the teaching of mathematical concepts. This paper reports research that compared the effectiveness of non-digital games with non-game but engaging activities as pedagogical tools for promoting mathematical learning. In the classrooms that played games, the effects of adding teacher-led whole class discussion was explored. The research was conducted with 10–12-year-old children in eight classrooms in three Australian primary schools, using differing instructional approaches to teach multiplication and division of decimals. A quasi-experimental design with pre-test, post-test and delayed post-test was employed, and the effects of the interventions were measured by the children’s written test performance. Test results indicated lesser gains in learning in game playing situations versus non-game activities and that teacher-led discussions during and following the game playing did not improve children’s learning. The finding that these games did not help children demonstrate a mathematical understanding of concepts under test conditions suggests that educators should carefully consider the application and appropriateness of games before employing them as a vehicle for introducing mathematical concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afari, E., Aldridge, J., & Fraser, B. (2012). Effectiveness of using games in tertiary-level mathematics classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, online, 1–24.

  • Amorim, M. A. (2003). “What is my avatar seeing?”: The coordination of “out-of-body” and “embodied” perspectives for scene recognition across views. Visual Cognition, 10(2), 157–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asplin, P., Frid, S. & Sparrow, L. (2006). Game playing to develop mental computation: A case study. In P. Grootenboer, R. Zevenbergen & M. Chinnappan (Eds.), Identities, cultures, and learning spaces: Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Canberra (pp. 46–53). Adelaide: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avraamidou, A. & Monaghan, J. (2009). Abstraction through game play. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou & H. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 73–80). Thessaloniki, Greece: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booker, G. (1996). Instructional games in the teaching and learning of mathematics. In H. Forgasz, T. Jones, G. Leder, J. Lynch, K. Maguire & C. Pearn (Eds.), Mathematics: Making connections (pp. 77–82). Brunswick, Victoria: The Mathematical Association of Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booker, G. (2000). The maths game: Using instructional games to teach mathematics. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booker, G. (2004). Playing to win: Using games for motivation and the development of mathematical thinking. In A. Rogerson (Ed.), The future of mathematics education. Proceedings of the Mathematics into the 21st Century International Conference (pp. 16–20). Poland: Ciechocinek.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bragg, L. A. (2003). Children’s perspectives on mathematics and game playing. In L. Bragg, C. Campbell, G. Herbert & J. Mousley (Eds.), Mathematics education research: Innovation, networking, opportunity—Proceedings of the 26th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (Vol. 1, pp. 160–167). Deakin University, Geelong: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bragg, L. A. (2006a). Hey, I’m learning this. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 11(4), 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bragg, L. A. (2006b). The impact of mathematical games on learning, attitudes, and behaviours., Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.

  • Bragg, L. A. (2007). Students’ conflicting attitudes towards games as a vehicle for learning mathematics: A methodological dilemma. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19(1), 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brannan, R. (1983). Problem solving in mathematics, Grade 8. Lane County Mathematics Project (Vol. 5). Palo Alto, USA: Dale Seymour Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright, G. W., Harvey, J. G. & Wheeler, M. M. (1983). Use of a game to instruct on logical reasoning. School Science and Mathematics, 83(5), 396–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bright, G. W., Harvey, J. G. & Wheeler, M. M. (1985). Learning and mathematics games. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education-Monograph Number, 1, 1–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J., Perry, B., Wong, N.-Y. & Wang, T. (2009). What is effective teaching? In J. Cai, G. Kaiser, B. Perry & N.-Y. Wong (Eds.), Effective mathematics teaching from teachers’ perspectives: National and cross-national studies. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duit, R. (1995). The constructivist view: A fashionable and fruitful paradigm for science education research and practice. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 271–285). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ell, F. (2007). Keeping going at country school: Sustaining numeracy project practices Findings from the New Zealand Numeracy Development Project 2006. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernest, P. (1986). Games: A rationale for their use in the teaching of mathematics in school. Mathematics in School, 15(1), 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernest, P. (1989). Games: A rationale for their use in the teaching of mathematics. In P. Ernest (Ed.), Mathematics teaching: The state of the art (pp. 88–95). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E. & Airasian, P. W. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (Vol. 10th). USA: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerdes, P. (2001). Exploring the game of “julirde”: A mathematical-educational game played by fulbe children in Cameroon. Teaching Children Mathematics, 7(6), 321–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, J. (1993). Playing games to learn maths. In J. Mousley & M. Rice (Eds.), Mathematics of primary importance (pp. 218–221). Brunswick, Victoria: The Mathematical Association of Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, B. (1987). Nonconservation of multiplication and division involving decimals. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18(1), 37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, K. (Ed.). (1981). Children’s understanding of mathematics (pp. 11–16). London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J. G. & Bright, G. W. (1985). Basic math games. Palo Alto, California: Dale Seymour Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, S. (2000). The logical zoombinis. Teaching Thinking, 1(1).

  • Kamii, C. K. & DeClark, G. (1985). Young children reinvent arithmetic: Implications of Piaget’s theory. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamii, C. K. & Rummelsburg, J. (2008). Arithmetic for first graders lacking number concepts. Teaching Children Mathematics, 14(7), 389–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. L. (2009). Enhancement of fractions from playing a game. In R. Hunter, B. Bicknell & T. Burgess (Eds.), Crossing divides: MERGA 32: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Mathematics (Vol. 1, pp. 323–330). Palmerston North, NZ: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim-Teo, S. K. (1991). Games in the mathematics classroom. Teaching and Learning, 11(2), 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovitt, C. & Clarke, D. M. (1988). The mathematics curriculum and teaching program professional development package (Vol. 1). Canberra: Curriculum Development Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloy, R. W., Edwards, S. A. & Anderson, G. (2010). Teaching math problem solving using a web-based tutoring system, learning games, and students’ writing. Journal of STEM Education, 11(1&2), 82–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, J. A. (1995). A study of intrinsic motivation in the mathematics classroom: A personal constructs approach. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(3), 254–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, P. (2007). Different ways in which students handle chance encounters in the explorative setting of a dice game. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(3), 293–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, S. & Williams, A. (2009). Improving students’ attitudes to chance with games and activities. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 65(3), 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, B. J. (1991). Games in the learning of mathematics—Part 1: Classification. Mathematics in School, 20(1), 41–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onslow, B. (1990). Overcoming conceptual obstacles: The qualified use of a game. School Science and Mathematics, 90(7), 581–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oritz, E. (2003). Research findings from games involving basic facts operations and algebraic thinking at a PDS. Paper presented at the Annual Holmes Partnership Conference, Washington, DC.

  • Peters, S. (1998). Playing games and learning mathematics: The results of two intervention studies. International Journal of Early Years Education, 6(1), 49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2005). Don’t bother me Mom—I’m learning. USA: Paragon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2010). Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. USA: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provenzo, E. F. (1991). Video kids: Making sense of Nintendo. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramani, G. & Siegler, R. S. (2008). Promoting broad and stable improvements in low-income children’s numerical knowledge through playing number board games. Child Development, 79(1), 375–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roche, A. (2010). Helping students to make sense of decimal place value. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 15(2), 4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigo, M. M. T. (2011). Dynamics of student cognitive-affective transitions during a mathematics game. Simulation & Gaming, 42(1), 85–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saifer, S. (2010). Higher order play and its role in development and education. Psychological Science and Education, 3, 38–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S. & Ramani, G. B. (2008). Playing linear numerical board games promotes low-income children’s numerical development. Developmental Science, 11(5), 655–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skemp, R. (1993). Structured activities for intelligent learning. Calgary, Canada: EEC Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, P., Clarke, D. M. & O’Shea, H. (2009). Students’ opinions about characteristics of their desired mathematics lessons. In L. Sparrow, B. Kissane & C. Hurst (Eds.), Shaping the future of mathematics education: Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 531–539). Fremantle: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, P., Mousley, J., & Jorgensen, R. (2009). Tasks and pedagogies that facilitate mathematical problem solving. In B. Kaur, Y. B. Har & M. Kapur (Eds.), Mathematical problem solving : Yearbook 2009 (pp. 17–42). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, P. (1996). Kids and calculators: Using calculators in the primary classroom. Bunbury, Western Australia: A-Z Type.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. E. & Grouws, D. A. (1984). Inducing cognitive growth in concrete-operational college students. School Science and Mathematics, 84(3), 233–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirosh, D. & Graeber, A. (1990). Evoking cognitive conflict to explore preservice teachers’ thinking about division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(2), 98–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiersma, W. (2009). Research methods in education: An introduction (9th ed.). Needham Heights, Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, T. (1995). From alternative epistemologies to practice in education: Rethinking what is means to teach and learn. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 331–339). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young-Loveridge, J. M. (2004). Effects on early numeracy of a program using number books and games. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 82–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leicha A. Bragg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bragg, L.A. TESTING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MATHEMATICAL GAMES AS A PEDAGOGICAL TOOL FOR CHILDREN’S LEARNING. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 10, 1445–1467 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9349-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9349-9

Key words

Navigation