ABSTRACT
Science as inquiry and mathematics as problem solving are conjoined fraternal twins attached by their similarities but with distinct differences. Inquiry and problem solving are promoted in contemporary science and mathematics education reforms as a critical attribute of the nature of disciplines, teaching methods, and learning outcomes involving understandings, attitudes, and processes. The investigative and quantitative processes involved in scientific inquiry include seeking problems, identifying researchable questions, proposing hypotheses, designing fair tests, collecting and interpreting data as evidence for claims, constructing evidence-based arguments, and communicating knowledge claims. Within this empirical context, science and mathematics come together to solve problems with evidence, construct knowledge claims, communicate claims, and persuade others that the claims are valid and useful. This study examined the intersection of inquiry and problem solving and the use of mathematics in 26 extracurricular open science inquiries. The category and the appropriateness of the mathematical procedures revealed these students used measurement, numeracy skills of counting and calculation, and tables and graphs in their science inquiries. It was found that most measurements in the science inquiries were used appropriately, but there is room for improvement with other mathematical procedures that involve higher-level thinking skills, such as analyzing and calculating numerical data and interpreting graphs and tables. The findings imply that mathematics and science are connected in inquiry and should be extended to solve real-life problems and that instruction should emphasize comprehending and interpreting data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1990). Science for all Americans: Project 2061. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: Project 2061. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, J. O., Chui, M-H. & Yore, L. D. (2010). First cycle of PISA (2000–2006)—International perspectives on successes and challenges: Research and policy directions. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 373–388.
Chalufour, I., Hoisington, C., Moriarty, R., Winkour, J. & Worth, K. (2004). The science and mathematics of building structures. Science and Children, 41(4), 30–34.
Charlesworth, R., & Lind, K. K. (2010). Math & science for young children (6th ed.). Albany, NY: Delmar.
Curriculum Development Council (2002). Science education: Key learning area curriculum guide (primary 1 - secondary 3). Hong Kong: Government Printer.
DeBoer, G. E. (2006). Historical perspectives on inquiry teaching in schools. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 17–35). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Department for Education (2011). Primary curriculum subjects—Science. Cheshire, England: Author.
Duschl, R. A. (2000). Making the nature of science explicit. In R. Millar, J. Leach, & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education: The contribution of research (pp. 187–206). Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
Furner, J. M. & Kumar, D. D. (2007). The mathematics and science integration argument: A strand for teacher education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(3), 185–189.
Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Byrd-Craven, J., Nugent, L. & Numtee, C. (2007). Cognitive mechanisms underlying achievement deficits in children with mathematical learning disability. Child Development, 78(4), 1343–1359.
Gersten, R., Jordan, N. C. & Flojo, J. R. (2005). Early identification and interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 293–304.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G. & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.
Hurley, M. M. & Normandia, B. (2005). A taste of math & science. Science Scope, 29(1), 26–29.
Jordan, N. C., Glutting, J. & Ramineni, C. (2010). The importance of number sense to mathematics achievement in first and third grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(2), 82–88.
Kuhn, D., Black, J., Keselman, A. & Kaplan, D. (2000). The development of cognitive skills to support inquiry learning. Cognition and Instruction, 18(4), 495–523.
Landerl, K., Bevan, A. & Butterworth, B. (2004). Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: A study of 89-year-old students. Cognition, 93(2), 99–125.
Long, K. & Kamii, C. (2001). The measurement of time: Children’s construction of transitivity, unit iteration, and conservation of speed, School Science and Mathematics, 101(3), 125–132.
Martin, S., Sharp, J. & Zachary, L. (2004). Thinking engineering. Science and Children, 41(4). 18–23.
Masingila, J. O., Muthwii, S. M. & Kimani, P. M. (2011). Understanding students’ out-of-school mathematics and science practices. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 89–108.
Meaney, T. (2007). Weighing up the influence of context on judgements of mathematical literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 681–704.
Meredith, A., Rogers, P., Volkmann, M. J. & Abell, S. K. (2007). Science and mathematics—A natural connection. Science and Children, 45(2), 60–61.
Morrison, J. & McDuffie, A. R. (2009). Connecting science and mathematics: Using inquiry investigations to learn about data collection, analysis, and display. School Science and Mathematics, 109(1), 31–40.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000) Principles and standards for school mathematics, Reston, VA: Author.
National Curriculum Board (2009). Shape of the Australian curriculum: Science. Canberra, Australia: Government of Australia.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers (2010). Common core state standards. Washington, DC: Author.
National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Committee on Development of an Addendum to the National Science Education Standards on Scientific Inquiry. In S. Olson & S. Loucks-Horsley (Eds.), Center for science, mathematics, and engineering education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas [Preliminary public draft]. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. In H. Quinn, H. A. Schweingruber & T. Keller (Eds.), Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Pang, J. & Good, R. (2000). A review of the integration of science and mathematics: Implications for further research. School Science and Mathematics, 100(2), 73–82.
Potgieter, M., Harding, A. & Engelbrecht, J. (2008). Transfer of algebraic and graphical thinking between mathematics and chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(2), 197–218.
Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R. S. & Alibali, M. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 346–362.
Rogers, M., Volkmann, M. & Abell, S. K. (2007). Science and mathematics: A natural connection. Science and Children, 45(2), 60–61.
Rommel-Esham, K. & Souhrada, C. (2002). Mission to Mars: A classroom simulation. Science and Children, 39(5), 16–21.
Schneider, R. M., Krajcik, J. & Blumenfeld, P. (2005). Enacting reform-based science materials: The range of teacher enactments in reform classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(3), 283–312.
Smith, L. D., Best, L. A., Stubbs, D. A., Archibald, A. B. & Roberson-Nay, R. (2002). Constructing knowledge: The role of graphs and tables in hard and soft psychology. American Psychologist, 57(10), 749–761.
So, W. M. W. (2003). Learning science through investigations: An experience with Hong Kong primary school children. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(1), 175–200.
So, W. M. W. (2006). Inquiry into primary pupils' science projects: Implication for design of inquiry learning. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 7(1), Article 3. Retrieved 18 July, 2011 from http://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/v7_issue1/sowm/index.htm.
So, W. M. W. & Zhong. M. (2009). Myths of science: How children know about science in inquiry projects. The International Journal of Science in Society, 1(2), 31–34
Sun, Y., Rye, J. & Selmer, S. (2010). Using pedometers in elementary science and mathematics methods courses. Journal of Mathematics Research, 2(4), 70–78.
Tate, W. F. & Malancharuvil-Berkes, E. (2006). A contract for excellence in scientific education: May I have your signature please? Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 278–285.
Vásquez-Mireles, S. & West, S. (2007). Mixing it up. The Science Teacher, 74(2), 47–49.
Walter, J. & Johnson, C. (2007). Linguistic invention and semantic warrant production: Elementary teachers’ interpretation of graphs. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 705–727.
Wilkins, J. L. M. (2000). Preparing for the 21st century: The status of quantitative literacy in the United States. School Science and Mathematics, 100(8), 405–418.
Yore, L. D. (2011). Foundations of scientific, mathematical, and technological literacies—Common themes and theoretical frameworks. In L. D. Yore, E. Van der Flier-Keller, D. W. Blades, T. W. Pelton, & D. B. Zandvliet (Eds.), Pacific CRYSTAL centre for science, mathematics, and technology literacy: Lessons learned (pp. 23–44). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
Yore, L. D. & Hand, B. (2010). Epilogue: Plotting a research agenda for multiple representations, multiple modality, and multimodal representational competency. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 93–101.
Yore, L. D., Pimm, D. & Tuan, H-L. (2007). The literacy component of mathematical and scientific literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 559–589.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
So, W.Wm. CONNECTING MATHEMATICS IN PRIMARY SCIENCE INQUIRY PROJECTS. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 11, 385–406 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9342-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9342-3