Advertisement

BUILDING MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT MODELS IN FOUR COUNTRIES USING TIMSS 2003

  • Ze WangEmail author
  • Steven J. Osterlind
  • David A. Bergin
Article

Abstract

Using the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study 2003 data, this study built mathematics achievement models of 8th graders in four countries: the USA, Russia, Singapore and South Africa. These 4 countries represent the full spectrum of mathematics achievement. In addition, they represent 4 continents, and they include 2 countries hugely influential in world events (the USA and Russia). In each country, students’ self-concept of ability in mathematics, mathematics values, perception of school, teachers’ and principals’ perceptions of school and other characteristics related to the classroom and school were incorporated to build an achievement model through hierarchical linear modelling. The final achievement models suggested that among student variables, self-concept of ability in mathematics had the highest relation to 8th graders’ mathematics achievement in all 4 countries. The relation between mathematics achievement and other student characteristics, along with the family, teacher and school variables, differed across the 4 countries. This suggests that self-concept of ability is a key variable for understanding achievement in high and low achieving countries and that other contextual variables vary in the magnitude of relations to mathematics achievement across countries.

Key words

mathematics achievement school climate self-concept of ability task values TIMSS 2003 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Astone, N. M. & McLanahan, S. S. (1991). Family structure, parental practices and high school completion. American Sociological Review, 56, 309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, D. P. & LeTendre, G. K. (2005). National differences, global similarities: World culture and the future of schooling. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  4. Bergin, C. & Bergin, D. (2009). Attachment in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 141–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cogan, L. S. & Schmidt, W. H. (2002). “Culture shock”—eighth-grade mathematics from an international perspective. Educational Research and Evaluation, 8, 13–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Equality and achievement in education. San Francisco: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  7. Costello, A. B. & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10, 173–178.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, H. A. (2003). Conceptualizing the role and influence of student–teacher relationships on children’s social and cognitive development. Educational Psychologist, 38, 207–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  10. DiStefano, C., Zhu, M. & Mindrila, D. (2009). Understanding and using factor scores: Considerations for the applied researcher. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 14(20), 1–11.Google Scholar
  11. Durik, A. M., Vida, M. & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Task values and ability beliefs as predictors of high school literacy choices: A development analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 382–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105–121). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  13. Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  14. Fan, X. & Chen, M. (2001). Parental Involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feuerstein, A. (2000). School characteristics and parent involvement: Influences on participation in children’s schools. The Journal of Educational Research, 94, 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freiberg, H. J., Huzinec, C. A. & Templeton, S. M. (2009). Classroom management—a pathway to student achievement: A study of fourteen inner-city elementary schools. The Elementary School Journal, 110(1), 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gainor, K. A. & Lent, R. W. (1998). Social cognitive expectations and racial identity attitudes in predicting the math choice intentions of Black college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 403–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Graham, J., Olchowski, A. & Gilreath, T. (2007). How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prevention Science, 8, 206–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greene, B. A., DeBacker, T. K., Ravindran, B. & Krows, A. J. (1999). Goals, values, and beliefs as predictors of achievement and effort in high school mathematics classes. Sex Roles, 40, 421–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guay, F., Marsh, H. W. & Boivin, M. (2003). Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Developmental perspectives on their causal ordering. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 124–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harter, S. (1998). The development of self-representations. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 553–617). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Hemmings, B., Grootenboer, P. & Kay, R. (2010). Predicting mathematics achievement: The influence of prior achievement and attitudes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 691–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hill, N. E. & Craft, S. A. (2003). Parent–school involvement and school performance: Mediated pathways among socioeconomically comparable African American and Euro-American families. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 74–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hill, N. E. & Tyson, D. F. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: A meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45, 740–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Howie, S., Scherman, V. & Venter, E. (2008). The gap between advantaged and disadvantaged students in science achievement in South African secondary schools. Educational Research and Evaluation, 14, 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Joncas, M. (2004). TIMSS 2003 sampling weights and participation rates. In M. O. Martin, I. V. S. Mullis & S. J. Chrostowski (Eds.), TIMSS 2003 technical report. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.Google Scholar
  27. Kaplan, D. & Ferguson, A. J. (1999). On the utilization of sample weights in latent variable models. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Keith, T. Z. & Keith, P. B. (1993). Does parental involvement affect eighth-grade student achievement? Structural analysis of national data. School Psychology Review, 22, 474.Google Scholar
  29. Lee, J. & Shute, V. J. (2010). Personal and social–contextual factors in K–12 academic performance: An integrative perspective on student learning. Educational Psychologist, 45, 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee, V. & Smith, J. B. (1999). Social support and achievement for young adolescents in Chicago: The role of school academic press. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 907–945.Google Scholar
  31. Leithwood, K. & Hallinger, P. (Eds.). (2002). Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration. London: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  32. Maassen, G. H. & Bakker, A. B. (2001). Suppressor variables in path models: Definitions and interpretations. Sociological Methods & Research, 30(2), 241–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marsh, H. W. (1990). A multidimensional, hierarchical model of self-concept: Theoretical and empirical justification. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 77–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marsh, H. W. & Craven, R. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 133–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Koller, O. & Baumert, J. (2005). Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: Reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. Child Development, 76, 397–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marsh, H. W. & Yeung, A. S. (1997a). Causal effects of academic self-concept on academic achievement: Structural equation models of longitudinal data. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marsh, H. W. & Yeung, A. S. (1997b). Coursework selection: Relations to academic self-concept and achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 691–720.Google Scholar
  38. Martin, M. O. (Ed.). (2005). TIMSS 2003 user guide for the international database. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.Google Scholar
  39. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S. & Chrostowski, S. J. (Eds.). (2004). TIMSS 2003 technical report. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.Google Scholar
  40. Meece, J. L., Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. S. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young adolescents’ course enrollment intentions and performance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 60–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mislevy, R. J. (1991). Randomization-based inference about latent variables from complex samples. Psychometrika, 56, 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. O’Dwyer, L. M. (2005). Examining the variability of mathematics performance and its correlates using data from TIMSS ’95 and TIMSS ’99. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11, 155–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parcel, T. L. & Dufur, M. J. (2001). Capital at home and at school: Effects on student achievement. Social Forces, 79, 881–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pfeffermann, D., Skinner, C. J., Holmes, D. J., Goldstein, H. & Rasbash, J. (1998). Weighting for unequal selection probabilities in multilevel models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Statistical Methodology), 60, 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Raudenbush, S. W. & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Roeser, R. W., Midgley, C. & Urdan, T. C. (1996). Perceptions of the school psychological environment and early adolescents’ psychological and behavioral functioning in school: The mediating role of goals and belonging. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 408–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rumberger, R. W. & Palardy, G. J. (2005). Test scores, dropout rates, and transfer rates as alternative indicators of high school performance. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shavelson, R. J. & Marsh, H. W. (1986). On the structure of self-concept. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Anxiety and cognitions. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  50. Stapleton, L. M. (2002). The incorporation of sample weights into multilevel structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 475–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stevens, T., Wang, K., Olivarez, A. & Hamman, D. (2007). Use of self-perspectives and their sources to predict the mathematics enrollment intentions of girls and boys. Sex Roles, 56, 351–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. UNESCO International Bureau of Education (2006/2007). World data on education, 6th ed. http://www.ibe.unesco.org/Countries/WDE/2006/index.html
  53. Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L. & Cooper, H. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39, 111–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. von Davier, M. & Sinharay, S. (2007). An importance sampling EM algorithm for latent regression models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 32, 233–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Walberg, H. J. (1979). Educational environments and effects: Evaluation, policy, and productivity. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.Google Scholar
  56. Warwick, D. P. & Jatoi, H. (1994). Teacher gender and student achievement in Pakistan. Comparative Education Review, 38, 377–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wieczorek, C. C. (2008). Comparative analysis of educational systems of American and Japanese schools: Views and visions. Educational Horizons, 86, 99–111.Google Scholar
  58. Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wilkins, J. L. M. (2004). Mathematics and science self-concept: An international investigation. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72, 331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wu, M. (2005). The role of plausible values in large-scale surveys. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31, 114–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ze Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Steven J. Osterlind
    • 1
  • David A. Bergin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational, School and Counseling PsychologyUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations