Advertisement

UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING OF THERMAL PHYSICS IN EVERYDAY CONTEXTS

  • Helen Georgiou
  • Manjula Devi SharmaEmail author
Article

Abstract

Thermal physics is in the realm of everyday experience, underlies current environmental concerns, and underpins studies in sciences, health and engineering. In the state of NSW in Australia, the coverage of thermal topics in high school is minimal, and, hence, so is the conceptual understanding of students. This study takes a new approach at exploring conceptions of students with a qualitative analysis facilitated by NVivo complemented with reference to sociocultural ideas of learning. A 2-part pen and paper question was given to 598 first year university students of different educational backgrounds (and therefore physics expertise). ‘The Question’ was based on 2 familiar scenarios and required the selection of a concept first, followed by an explanation. The results showed that concepts were favoured based on a student’s everyday experience and their curriculum through high school, and some were more effective than others in making scientifically congruent responses. The reported thermal physics alternative conceptions were also examined in our sample, and students’ reasoning behind such conceptions indicate that some conceptions do not inhibit scientifically congruent responses whilst others do. The results implicate language and the everyday experiences of the student in the teaching and learning of thermal physics.

Key Words

sociocultural theory thermal physics university physics education 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adey, P. & Shayer, M. (1994). Really raising standards: Cognitive intervention and academic achievement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bazeley, P. (2007). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Brookes, D. T. (2006). The role of language in learning physics. PhD thesis, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick.Google Scholar
  4. Chang, J., Lee, H. & Yen, C. (2010). Alternative conceptions about burning held by Atayal indigene students in Taiwan. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 24.Google Scholar
  5. Chiou, G.-L. & Anderson, R. (2010). A multi-dimensional cognitive analysis of undergraduate physics students’ understanding of heat conduction. International Journal of Science Education, 32(16), 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christiansen, F. V. & Rump, C. (2007). Getting it right: Conceptual development from student to experienced engineer. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(4), 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, D. B. (2006). Longitudinal conceptual change in students’ understanding of thermal equilibrium: An examination of the process of conceptual restructuring. Cognition and Instruction, 24(4), 467–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. di Sessa, A. A. (2008). A bird’s eye view of the ‘pieces’ vs. ‘coherence’ controversy (from the pieces side of the fence). In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research ion conceptual change (p. 13). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E. & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.Google Scholar
  10. Duit, R. (2009). STCSE-Bibliography: Students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education. Kiel: IPN Leibniz Institute for Science Education.Google Scholar
  11. Erickson, G. L. (1979). Children’s conceptions’ of heat and temperature. Science Education, 63(2), 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Erickson, G. L. (1980). Children’s viewpoints of heat: A second look. Science Education, 64(3), 323–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feldon, D. F. (2007). The implications of research on expertise for curriculum and pedagogy. Educational Psychology Review, 19(2), 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Georgiou, H. & Sharma, M. D. (2010). A report on a preliminary diagnostic for identifying thermal physics conceptions of tertiary students. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 18(2).Google Scholar
  15. Granville, M. F. (1985). Student misconceptions in thermodynamics. Journal of Chemical Education, 62(10), 847–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Herrmann, F. (2004). Entropy from the beginning. Paper presented at the GIREP, Ostrava.Google Scholar
  17. Hestenes, D., Wells, M. & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. Physics Teacher, 30(March), 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hewson, M. G. A. & Hamlyn, D. (1984). The influence of intellectual environment on conceptions of heat. European Journal of Science Education, 6(3), 245–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. John-Steiner, V. & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 191–206.Google Scholar
  20. Leach, J. T. & Scott, P. H. (2008). Teaching for conceptual understanding: An approach drawing on individual and sociocultural perspectives. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Lewis, E. L. & Linn, M. C. (1994). Heat energy and temperature concepts of adolescents, adults, and experts: Implications for curricular improvements. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(6), 657–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J. & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Loverude, M. E., Kautz, C. H. & Heron, P. R. L. (2002). Student understanding of the first law of thermodynamics: Relating work to the adiabatic compression of an ideal gas. American Journal of Physics, 70(2), 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marin, E. (2006). Thermal physics concepts: The role of thermal effusivity. The Physics Teacher, 44(October), 432–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meltzer, D.E. (2005). Investigation of student reasoning regarding concepts in thermal physics. American Physical Society Forum of Education Newsletter (Spring).Google Scholar
  26. Moreira, M. A. & Santos, C. A. (1981). The influence of content organization on student’s cognitive structure in thermodynamics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18(6), 525–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Morris, R. J. (1972). Lavoisier and the caloric theory. The British Journal for the History of Science, 6(21), 39.Google Scholar
  28. New South Wales Board of Studies (2003). Science stages 4–5 syllabus. Sydney.Google Scholar
  29. Özdemir, G. & Clark, D. B. (2007). An overview of conceptual change theories. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(4), 351–361.Google Scholar
  30. Romer, R. H. (2001). Heat is not a noun. American Journal of Physics, 69(2), 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Strand-Cary, M. & Klahr, D. (2008). Developing elementary science skills: Instructional effectiveness and path independence. Cognitive Development, 23, 488–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yeo, S. & Zadnik, M. (2001). Introductory thermal concept evaluation: Assessing students’ understanding. The Physics Teacher, 39, 496–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zemansky, M. W. (1970). The use and misuse of the word ‘heat’ in physics teaching. The Physics Teacher, 8(6), 295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PhysicsUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations