Advertisement

STUDENTS’ SOURCES OF MOTIVATION FOR PARTICIPATING IN SCIENCE FAIRS: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY WITHIN THE CANADA-WIDE SCIENCE FAIR 2008

  • Liliane DionneEmail author
  • Giuliano Reis
  • Louis Trudel
  • Gabriel Guillet
  • Leonard Kleine
  • Corina Hancianu
Article

Abstract

Science fairs have been for many years a popular school activity in North America. They are a venue for the popularization of science and consequently an important encouragement for the pursuit of careers in science or engineering. However, little is known about students’ perceived motives for participating in local or national science fairs and about the way in which their involvement mediates their interest in science learning and scientific careers. The present study investigates the motivational factors associated with the high school students’ decision to participate in the 2008 Canada-Wide Science Fair, a thoroughly selected and highly motivated group. Our study examines 5 sources of motivation: (1) interest in science content, (2) sense of self-efficacy, (3) assurance of achievement through rewards or gratifications, (4) the social aspect of participating and (5) working strategies to gain scientific knowledge and methods. The understanding of the anticipated benefits participants seek through their involvement in science fairs may have the potential to help science teachers adapt instruction to appeal to a broader range of students in schools, thus nourishing the emergence of more interest in science.

KEY WORDS

factors of motivation interest and self-efficacy in science science fairs secondary school science students 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

References

  1. Abernathy, V. T. & Vineyard, N. R. (2001). Academic competitions in science: What are the rewards for students? Clearing House, 74(5), 269–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderman, E. M. & Maehr, M. L. (1994). Motivation and schooling in the middle grades. Review of Educational Research, 64, 287–309.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  4. Brophy, J. (1998). Motivating students to learn. Madison: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  5. Bryant, F. B. & Yarnold, P. R. (1995). Principal-components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory analysis. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 99–136). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  6. Craven, J. & Hogan, T. (2008). Rethinking the science fair. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(9), 679–680.Google Scholar
  7. Czerniak, C. M. (1996). Predictors of success in a district science fair competition: An exploratory study. School Science and Mathematics, 96, 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  9. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, vol. 38. Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237–288). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  10. Deci, E. L. (1992). The relation of interest to the motivation of behaviour: A self-determination theory perspective. In K. A. Renninger, S. HiDi & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Dionne, L., Trudel, L. & Reis, G. (2009). La participation des élèves aux Expo-sciences: Une source de motivation inestimable! Paper presented at the 77e Congrès Annuel de L’Association Francophone pour le Savoir (ACFAS), Ottawa, ON Canada.Google Scholar
  12. Ebi, B. D. (2005). An investigation of secondary school students’ self-reported reasons for participation in extracurricular musical and athletic activities. Research and Issues in Music Education, 3(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
  13. Eurobaromètre (2001). Les Européens, la science et la technologie. Commission Européenne. Retrieved 20 June 2010 from http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/press/2001/pr0612fr-report.pdf.
  14. Feldman, A. F. & Matjasko, J. L. (2005). Role of school-based extracurricular activities in adolescent development: A comprehensive review and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 159–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glaser-Zikuda, M. & Fusz, S. (2008). Impact of teacher competencies on student emotions: A multi-method approach. International Journal of Education al Research, 47, 136–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Inoue, N. (2007). Why face a challenge? The reason behind intrinsically motivated students' spontaneous choice of challenging tasks. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(3), 251–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lewis, C. C., Schapps, E. & Watson, M. (1995). Beyond the pendulum: Creating challenging and caring schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(7), 547–554.Google Scholar
  18. Linh, C. (2007). [Your college here] wants to be your “friend”. Campus Technology, 20(13), 44–52.Google Scholar
  19. Marsh, P. (2004). Examining the elements of students’ self-schemas. Masters Abstracts International, 43(02), 0629. Retrieved from http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqdiss&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:MQ93567.Google Scholar
  20. Petri, H. L. (1986). Motivation: Theory and research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  21. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Report No. NCRIPTAL-91-B-004. Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 338 122).Google Scholar
  22. Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W. & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–199.Google Scholar
  23. Pintrich, P. R. & Schunk, D. H. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications (2 ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill Company.Google Scholar
  24. Riggs, I. M. & Enochs, L. G. (1990). Toward the development of an elementary teacher's science teaching efficacy belief instrument. Science Education, 74(6), 625–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schunk, D. H. (1985). Self-efficacy and school learning. Psychology in the Schools, 22, 208–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3/4), 207–231.Google Scholar
  27. Simpson, R. D. & Oliver, J. S. (1990). A summary of major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students. Science Education, 74, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sinsel, J. (2008). The future scientists and engineers conference: Using community resources to enhance the science fair. Science Scope, 32(4), 14–19.Google Scholar
  29. Society for Science & the Public (2010). Our history. Retrieved 20 June 2010 from http://www.societyforscience.org/history.
  30. Tuan, H.-L., Chin, C.-C. & Shieh, S.-H. (2005a). The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 639–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tuan, H.-L., Chin, C.-C., Tsai, C.-C. & Cheng, S.-F. (2005b). Investigating the effectiveness of inquiry instruction on the motivation of different learning styles students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 541–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Watson, J. S. (2003). Examining perceptions of the science fair project: Content or process? School Library Media Research, 6(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
  33. Weinstein, C. & Mayer, R. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 315–327). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  34. Yasar, S., & Baker, D. (2003). The impact of involvement in a science fair on seventh grade students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 23–26 March 2003, Philadelphia, PA. ERIC document: ED 478905.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liliane Dionne
    • 1
    Email author
  • Giuliano Reis
    • 1
  • Louis Trudel
    • 1
  • Gabriel Guillet
    • 1
  • Leonard Kleine
    • 1
  • Corina Hancianu
    • 1
  1. 1.University of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations