ASSESSING UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS’ CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING AND CONFIDENCE OF ELECTROMAGNETICS
- 518 Downloads
The study examines how students’ conceptual understanding changes from high confidence with incorrect conceptions to high confidence with correct conceptions when reasoning about electromagnetics. The Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism test is weighted with students’ self-rated confidence on each item in order to infer how strongly conceptions are held. The data (N = 118) are collected from an undergraduate static field theory course at a technical university in Finland. The data are analyzed using frequency distributions, correlation, and independent-samples t test. In overall, students’ confidence grows along with the conceptual gains after instruction. The significant difference in the development of conceptual understanding between high-achieving and low-achieving students is found in the conceptual area of Newton’s laws. Several strongly held alternative conceptions are also identified.
Key wordsconceptual understanding confidence CSEM electromagnetics physics education research
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This work is part of the EPOP project and was supported by Aalto University School of Electrical Engineering.
- Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., Cocking, R. R. & U.S. National Research Council Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Brown, D. E. & Hammer, D. (2008). Conceptual change in physics. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (p. 127). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- diSessa, A. A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman & P. Pufall (Eds.), Constructivism in the computer age (pp. 49–70). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- diSessa, A. A. (2006). A history of conceptual change research. Threads and fault lines. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 265–282). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Duit, R. (1999). Conceptual change approaches in science education. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou & M. Carretero (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 263–282). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Klymkowsky, M. W., Taylor, L. B., Spindler, S. R. & Garvin-Daxas, R. K. (2006). Research and teaching: Two dimensional, implicit confidence tests as a tool for recognizing student misconceptions. Journal of College Science Teaching, 2006, 44–48.Google Scholar
- Lindell, I. V. & Sihvola, A. (2007). Electromagnetic field theory. Static fields. Espoo, Finland: Otatieto. in Finnish.Google Scholar
- Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Notaros, B. M. (2002). Concept inventory assessment instruments for electromagnetics education. Proceedings of the Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium 2002. (pp. 684–687). IEEE.Google Scholar
- Saglam, M. (2010). Students’ performance awareness, motivational orientations and learning strategies in a problem-based electromagnetism course. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11, Article 16.Google Scholar
- Seymor, E. & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Oxford, UK: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Thompson, B. (1993). The use of statistical significance tests in research: Bootstrap and other alternatives. The Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 361–377.Google Scholar
- Vosniadou, S. (2002). On the nature of naïve physics. In M. Limon, L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change. Issues in theory and practice (pp. 61–76). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Vosniadou, S. (2008). An introduction. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (p. xiv). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar