Advertisement

THE LENGTH MEASUREMENT IN THE TURKISH MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM: ITS POTENTIAL TO CONTRIBUTE TO STUDENTS’ LEARNING

  • Gulcin Tan-SismanEmail author
  • Meral Aksu
Article

ABSTRACT

“Knowing and doing measurement” is a fundamental competency in real life since measuring attributes of objects in appropriate units and using measuring tools assist students to quantify and understand the world. For this reason, the study of measurement has a special place in every mathematics curriculum. Among the domains of measurement, length measurement is extremely important for students to understand basic ideas about measurement and to construct bases for more advance topics as area and volume measurement. However, research on students’ understanding of length measurement reveals serious difficulties varying from incorrect alignment with a ruler to confusion of perimeter with area. One of the reasons for students’ struggles in measurement is considered as weaknesses in the intended (written) curriculum. In this respect, this study was designed to investigate the content of length measurement in the Turkish mathematics curriculum (1st–fifth grade) in terms of its potential to support students’ understanding. For this purpose, the Turkish Mathematics Curriculum Guide was carefully analyzed by considering main components of the curriculum (e.g. learning objectives). In spite of some weaknesses, the length measurement content in the curriculum seems to provide meaningful opportunities for students to develop the concepts and skills involved in length measurement.

KEY WORDS

curriculum analysis length measurement teaching and learning measurement Turkish Elementary Mathematics Curriculum 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aksit, N. (2007). Educational reform in Turkey. International Journal of Educational Development, 27, 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albayrak, M., Isik, C. & ve Ipek, A. S. (2006). Ilkogretim ogrencilerinin (1–5.Siniflar) ölçme ögrenme alanindaki performanslari [Elementary school children’ performance on measurement]. In Paper presented at the 7th National Congress on Science and Mathematics Education, September 6–8. Ankara.Google Scholar
  3. Ata, B. (2001). An American educator, John Dewey's journey to Turkey under the light of 1924 Turkish Press. G.Ü. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(3), 193–207.Google Scholar
  4. Babadoğan, C. & Olkun, S. (2006). Program development models and reform in Turkish primary school mathematics curriculum. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning. http://www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal/default.htm.
  5. Binbasioglu, C. (1995). Türkiye’de eğitim bilimleri tarihi (History of Turkish educational sciences). The series of research and examination. Ankara, Turkey: MEB.Google Scholar
  6. Blume, G. W., Galindo, E. & Walcott, C. (2007). Performance in measurement and geometry from the viewpoint of the Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. In P. Kloosterman & F. K. Lester (Eds.), Results and interpretations of the 2003 Mathematics Assessment of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (pp. 95–138). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  7. Bragg, P. & Outhred, L. N. (2000). What is taught versus what is learnt: The case of linear measurement. In J. Bana & A. Chapman (Eds.), Mathematics education beyond 2000 (Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australia (MERGA), Perth, Vol. 1) (pp. 112–118). Sydney, NSW, Australia: MERGA.Google Scholar
  8. Boulton-Lewis, G. M., Wilss, L. A. & Mutch, S. L. (1996). An analysis of young children’s strategies and use of devices for length measurement. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15, 329–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clements, D. H., Battista, M. T., Sarama, J., Swaminathan, S. & McMillen, S. (1997). Students’ development of length measurement concepts in a Logo-based unit on geometric paths. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clements, D. H. (1999). Teaching length measurement: Research challenges. School Science & Mathematics, 99(1), 5–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Delil, A. & Güleş, S. (2007). Yeni ilköğretim 6. sınıf matematik programındaki geometri ve ölçme öğrenme alanlarının yapılandırmacı öğrenme yaklaşımı açısından değerlendirilmesi. Uludağ Üniveristesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, XX(1), 35–48.Google Scholar
  12. Ellis, S. & Siegler, R. S. (1995). Developmental changes in children's understanding of principles and procedures of measurement. In Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development. Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
  13. Erbas, A. K. & Ulubay, M. (2008). Implementation of the new Turkish primary education mathematics curriculum in the sixth grade: A survey of teachers’ views. The New Educational Review, 16(3–4), 51–76.Google Scholar
  14. Hiebert, J. (1981). Units of measure: Results and implications from national assessment. Arithmetic Teacher, 28(6), 38–43.Google Scholar
  15. Hook, W. (2004). Curriculum makes a huge difference—a summary of conclusions from the Trends in International Mathematics Study (TIMSS) with California data added. Unpublished report, March 5, 2004. Retrieved August 1, 2009, www.nychold.com/report-hook-040305.pdf.
  16. Kamii, C. & Clark, F. (1997). Measurement of length: The need for a better approach to teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 97(3), 116–121. 299–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kidman, G. & Cooper, T. J. (1997). Area integration rules for grades 4, 6, 8 students. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 132–143). Lahti, Finland: University of Finland.Google Scholar
  18. Koc, Y., Isiksal, M. & Bulut, S. (2007). The elementary school curriculum reform in Turkey. International Education Journal, 8(2007), 30–39.Google Scholar
  19. Lehrer, R., Jacobson, C., Thoyre, G., Kemeny, V., Strom, D., Horvath, J., Gance, S. & Koehler, M. (1998a). Developing understanding of geometry and space in the primary grades. In R. Lehrer & D. Chazan (Eds.), Designing learning environments for developing understanding of geometry and space (pp. 169–200). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  20. Lehrer, R., Jenkins, M. & Osana, H. (1998b). Longitudinal study of children’s reasoning about space and geometry. In R. Lehrer & D. Chazan (Eds.), Designing learning environments for developing understanding of geometry and space (pp. 137–167). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Lehrer, R., Jacobson, C., Kemeny, V. & Strom, D. (1999). Building on children’s intuitions to develop mathematical understanding of space. In E. Fennema & T. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 63–87). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  22. Lehrer, R. (2003). Developing understanding of measurement. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (pp. 179–192). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  23. Ministry of National Education [MONE] (2001). National education at the beginning of 2002. Retrieved July 4, 2010, from http://www.meb.gov.tr/Stats/apk2002ing/apage00_0.htm.
  24. Ministry of National Education [MONE] (2009a). National education statistics formal education 2008–2009. Ankara, Turkey: MONE. http://sgb.meb.gov.tr/istatistik/meb_istatistikleri_orgun_egitim_2008_2009.pdf.
  25. Ministry of National Education [MONE] (2009b) Ilkogretim Matematik Dersi (1–5 siniflar) Ogretim Programi Taslagi [Elementary school mathematics curriculum guide (grades 1–5)]. Ankara, Turkey: MONE. www.ttkb.meb.gov.tr/ogretmen.
  26. Mullis, I., Dossey, J., Owen, E. & Phillips, G. (1991). The state of mathematics achievement: Executive summary. ERIC document reproduction service no. ED 330 546. Princeton, NJ: National Assessment of Educational Progress.Google Scholar
  27. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  28. Onkol, P. & Tan, G. (2005). A steep road to EU: The role of Turkish public libraries in lifelong learning. Adult perspective. In Paper presented at international conference on lifelong learning in the Balkans: A historical context and current trends, 1–3 July, 2005. Belgrade-Serbia and Montenegro.Google Scholar
  29. Smith, J., P., Tan-Sisman, G., Figueras, H., Lee, K., Dietiker, L., & Lehrer, R. (2008a). Assessing curricular contributions to poor measurement learning. In Research symposium (90-min session) at the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) 2008 annual meeting and exposition: Becoming certain about uncertainty, 9–12 April. Salt Lake City, Utah.Google Scholar
  30. Smith, J. P., Tan-Sisman, G., Dietiker, L., Figueras, H., Males, L., Lee, K., Mosier, A., & Chang, K.(2008b). Framing the analysis of written measurement curricula. In Poster presented at American Educational Research Association, 2008 annual meeting: Research on schools, neighborhoods, and communities: Toward civic responsibility, 24–28 March. New York, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Stephan, M. & Clements, D. H. (2003). Linear and area measurement in pre-kindergarten to grade 2. In D. H. Clements & G. Bright (Eds.), Learning and teaching measurement: 2003 yearbook (pp. 3–16). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  32. Stephan, M., Bowers, J., Cobb, P. & Gravemeijer, K. (2003). Supporting students' development of measuring conceptions: Analyzing students’ learning in context (JRME monograph no. 12). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  33. Szilagyi, J. (2007). Young children's understandings of length measurement: A developmental progression. Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo, NY. Retrieved August 12, 2009, from dissertations & theses: Full text (Publication no. AAT 3262001).Google Scholar
  34. Tan-Sisman, G. & Aksu, M. (2009). Seventh grade students’ success on the topics of area and perimeter. İlköğretim-Online, 8(1), 243–253.Google Scholar
  35. TIMSS International Study Center (2000). Third International Mathematics and Science Study repeat-1999: Percent of responses by item category for the mathematics items. Retrieved July 4, 2009, from http://timss.bc.edu/timss1999i/pdf/bialm5mm2.pdf.
  36. Turan, S. (2000). John Dewey’s report of 1924 and his recommendations on the Turkish education system revisited. History of Education, 29(6), 543–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wolf-Gazo, E. (1996). John Dewey in Turkey: An educational mission. Journal of American Studies of Turkey, 3, 15–42.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of EducationAkdeniz UniversityAntalyaTurkey
  2. 2.Middle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations