Advertisement

HOMEWORK AND MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT IN HONG KONG: EVIDENCE FROM THE TIMSS 2003

  • Yan ZhuEmail author
  • Frederick Koon Shing Leung
Article

Abstract

Though it is generally believed that doing homework promotes better learning, no consensus has been achieved concerning its importance and relevance to students’ achievement. The historical up-and-down status of public attitudes toward homework indicates that understanding about the role of homework in students’ learning is far from comprehensive and clear. The literature shows that much research effort has been devoted to the relationship between amount of homework and achievement, but little on quality of homework and how it has been used. Applying a 2-level hierarchical linear model on the TIMSS 2003 data, this study investigated the relationship between classroom practices on homework and 8th grade students’ mathematics achievement in Hong Kong in three dimensions: frequency and amount of homework, types of homework, and usage modes of homework. The results showed that while the time spent on daily mathematics homework had significantly positive effect on students’ TIMSS results, no effect was observed on the frequency of homework assigned. Out of three types of homework, only homework of the problem/question type demonstrated significant effect. The practice of having students start homework in class had negative influence on students’ learning outcome. Implications and suggestions for educational practice and future research were then discussed.

Key words

hierarchical linear model homework Hong Kong mathematics achievement TIMSS 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boys’ and Girls’ Clubs Association of Hong Kong (1989). A survey of school students’ leisure life in Hong Kong. Hong Kong SAR, China: The Author.Google Scholar
  2. Boys’ and Girls’ Clubs Association of Hong Kong (2002). A survey of school students’ leisure life in Hong Kong. Hong Kong SAR, China: The Author.Google Scholar
  3. Bracey, G. (2000). The TIMSS final year study and report: A critique. Educational Research, 29(4), 4–10.Google Scholar
  4. Cai, J. (2003). Investigating parental roles in students’ learning of mathematics from a cross-national perspective. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15, 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, C. & Stevenson, H. W. (1989). Homework: A cross-cultural examination. Child Development, 60(3), 551–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Committee on Home-School Co-operation (1994). A survey of parents’ opinions toward students’ homework and weight of schoolbags. Hong Kong SAR, China: Education Bureau.Google Scholar
  7. Cooper, H. (1989). Synthesis of research on homework. Educational Leadership, 47(3), 85–91.Google Scholar
  8. Cooper, H. (2001). Homework for all-in moderation. Educational Leadership, 58(7), 34–39.Google Scholar
  9. Cooper, H., Robinson, J. C. & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987–2003. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 1–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper, H. & Valentine, J. C. (2001). Using research to answer practical questions about homework. Educational Psychologist, 36(3), 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Curriculum Development Council (1999). Syllabus for secondary schools—mathematics (secondary 1–5). Hong Kong, China: The Author.Google Scholar
  12. Curriculum Development Council (2002). Basic education curriculum guide building on strengths (primary 1–secondary 3). Hong Kong, China: The Author.Google Scholar
  13. Department of Education (2002). Helping your child with homework: For parents of children in elementary through middle school. Washington, DC: The Author.Google Scholar
  14. Department of Education and Skills (1998). Homework: Guidelines for primary and secondary schools. London: The Author.Google Scholar
  15. Department of Education and Training (2000). Homework policy. Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia: The Author.Google Scholar
  16. Foy, P. & Joncas, M. (2004). TIMSS 2003 sampling design. In M. O. Martin, I. V. S. Mullis & S. J. Chrostowski (Eds.), TIMSS 2003 technical report: Findings from IEA’s trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the fourth and eighth grades (pp. 109–122). Chestnut Hill, MA: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.Google Scholar
  17. Hallam, S. (2004). Homework: The evidence. London: University of London, Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  18. Hoang, T. (2007). Learning and instruction in mathematics: A study of achievement in Saigon, Vietnam. International Journal for Mathematics and Learning. Retrieved on October 30, 2010, from http://www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal/hoang.pdf.
  19. Huntsinger, C. S., Joes, P. E., Larson, S. L., Krieg, D. B. & Shaligram, C. (2000). Mathematics, vocabulary, and reading development in Chinese American and European American over primary school years. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 745–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lan, M.-C., & Li, M. (2006). The relationship between classroom practices on homework and student performance in mathematics on TIMSS 2003. Paper presented at IEA International Research Conference 2006—TIMSS, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  21. Li, G. (2005). Family as educator: A Chinese-Canadian experience of acquiring second language literacy. Canadian Children, 30(2), 9–16.Google Scholar
  22. Mau, W. (1997). Parental influences on the high school students’ academic achievement: Comparison of Asian immigrants, Asian Americans, and white Americans. Psychology in the Schools, 34, 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ordonez, V. & Maclean, R. (1997). Asian: The impact of educational research on decision making. Prospects, XXVII(4), 645–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Raudenbush, S. W. & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear model: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Sharp, C., Keys, W., & Benefield, P. (2001). Homework: A review of recent research. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research. Retrieved on May 26, 2008, from http://www.nfer.ac.uk/research-areas/pims-data/summaries/hwk-review-of-studies-on-homework.cfm
  26. Smith, I. D. (2003). Home and coaching. In J. P. Keeves & R. Watanabe (Eds.), The international handbook of educational research in the Asian-Pacific region (pp. 755–766). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Press.Google Scholar
  27. The State of Queensland Department of Education and the Arts (2004). Homework literature review: Summary of key research findings. Brisbane, QLD, Australia: The Author.Google Scholar
  28. Turvey, J. S. (1986). Homework—its importance to student achievement. NASSP Bulletin, 70, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang, J. (2001). TIMSS primary and middle school data: Some technical concerns. Educational Researcher, 30(6), 17–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yeung, S. (2006). Meaningful homework? A critical reflection of the new homework policy in Hong Kong. Paper presented at Assessment IAEA. Retrieved on May 26, 2008, from http://www.iaea2006.seab.gov.sg/conference/download/papers/Meaningful%20homework.%20A%20critical%20reflection%20of%20the%20new%20homework%20policy%20in%20Hong%20Kong.pdf
  31. Zimmerman, B. J. & Kitsantas, A. (2005). Homework practices and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-efficacy and perceived responsibility beliefs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 397–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Education ScienceEast China Normal UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationThe University of Hong KongHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations