WIDENING AND INCREASING POST-16 MATHEMATICS PARTICIPATION: PATHWAYS, PEDAGOGIES AND POLITICS
- 299 Downloads
This paper explores the potential impact of a national pilot initiative in England aimed at increasing and widening participation in advanced mathematical study through the creation of a new qualification for 16- to 18-year-olds. This proposed qualification pathway—Use of Mathematics—sits in parallel with long-established, traditional advanced level qualifications, what we call ‘traditional Mathematics’ herein. Traditional Mathematics is typically required for entry to mathematically demanding undergraduate programmes. The structure, pedagogy and assessment of Use of Mathematics is designed to better prepare students in the application of mathematics, and its development has surfaced some of the tensions between academic/pure and vocational/applied mathematics. Here, we explore what Use of Mathematics offers, but we also consider some of the objections to its introduction in order to explore aspects of the knowledge politics of mathematics education. Our evaluation of this curriculum innovation raises important issues for the mathematics education community as countries seek to increase the numbers of people that are well prepared to apply mathematics in science and technology-based higher education courses and work places.
Key wordscurriculum mathematics policy qualifications widening participation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Apple, M. (1993). Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Apple, M. (2004). Ideology and curriculum—3rd ed.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- AQA (2010). Specifications for AS Use of Mathematics. Retrieved 1 September 2010 from http://store.aqa.org.uk/qual/pdf/AQA-5351-W-SP-10.PDF.
- Ernest, P. (1992). The national curriculum in mathematics: Political perspectives and implications. In M. Nickson & S. Lerman (Eds.), The social context of mathematics education: Theory and practice (pp. 33–61). London: South Bank Press.Google Scholar
- Ernest, P. (2004). Relevance versus utility: Some ideas on what it means to know mathematics. In B. Clarke, D. M. Clarke, et al. (Eds.), Perspectives on learning and teaching mathematics (pp. 313–327). Goteborg: National Centre for Mathematics Education.Google Scholar
- Gago, J. M. (2004). Increasing human resources for science and technology in Europe. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
- Gutstein, E. (2009). The politics of mathematics education in the United States: Dominant and counter agendas. In B. S. Greer, Mukhopadhyay, et al. (Eds.), Culturally Responsive Mathematics Education (pp. 137–164). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Haighton, J., Haworth, A. & Wake, G. D. (2003a). AS: Use of maths, algebra & graphs. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.Google Scholar
- Haighton, J., Haworth, A. & Wake, G. D. (2003b). AS: Use of maths, statistics. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.Google Scholar
- Haighton, J., Haworth, A. & Wake, G. D. (2004). AS: Use of maths, calculus. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.Google Scholar
- Hoyles, C., Noss, R., Kent, P. & Bakker, A. (2010). Improving mathematics at work: The need for techo-mathematical literacies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Matthews, A. & Pepper, D. (2007). Evaluation of participation in A level mathematics: Final report. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.Google Scholar
- National Academies (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter future. Washington: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Noyes, A. (2007). Mathematics counts…for what? Rethinking the mathematics curriculum in England. Philosophy of Mathematics Education, 21 September 2007 Online http://people.exeter.ac.uk/PErnest/
- Restivo, S., & Sloan, D. (2007). The Sturm und Drang of mathematics: Casualties, consequences and contingencies in the math wars. Philosophy of Mathematics Education, 20 June 2007 Online http://people.exeter.ac.uk/PErnest/
- Roberts, G. (2002). SET for success: The supply of people with science, technology, engineering and mathematics skills. London: Department for Education and Science.Google Scholar
- Rocard, M. (2007). Science Education Now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
- Royal Society (2008). Science and mathematics education 14–19: A 'state of the nation' report on the participation and attainment of 14–19 year olds in science and mathematics in the UK. London: The Royal Society.Google Scholar
- Smith, A. (2004). Making mathematics count. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
- Steen, L. A. (2001). Data, shapes, symbols: Achieving balance in school mathematics. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), Mathematics and democracy: The case for quantitative literacy (pp. 53–74). Princeton: National Council on Education and the Disciplines.Google Scholar
- Treffers, A. (1987). Three dimensions: A model of goal and theory description in mathematics instruction—The Wiskobas Project. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
- Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2001) Realistic mathematics education as work in progress. Common Sense in Mathematics Education. Proceedings of the Netherlands and Taiwan Conference on Mathematics Education, (edited by Lin F.L.), Taipei, Taiwan.Google Scholar
- Wake, G. (2005). Functional mathematics: More than “back to basics”. Nuffield Review of 14–19 Education and Training, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
- Wake, G. (2010). Transition: Looking sideways as well as forwards. Unpublished paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Warwick, September 2010.Google Scholar
- Williams, J. S., Wake, G., Black, L., Davis, P., Hernandez-Martinez, P., Hutcheson, G., Nicholson, S. (2008). TLRP Research Briefing No 38: Keeping open the door to mathematically demanding programmes in Further and Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.lta.education.manchester.ac.uk/TLRP/Research%20Briefing.pdf.