• Mijung Kim
  • Heesook Yoon
  • Young Rae Ji
  • Jinwoong SongEmail author


With recognition of the importance of scientific literacy for the nation and yet the increasing students’ disinterest in science through school science curriculum, the Korea Science Foundation launched an innovative program called ‘Everyday Science Class (ESC)’ in partnership with universities and local government offices in 2003. In this work, we introduce the structure and dynamics of the ESC program in K-district through examining (1) how everyday contexts helped learners’ perceptions and attitudes toward science and (2) how the dynamics of learning environments effected learners’ learning process. We employed interviews and video recording of classes for data collection. To analyze the data, we used the process of thematic coding to understand the outcomes and effects of ESC program. The research findings showed that everyday context and a unique environment of learning with parents in the ESC program could bring forth learners’ understandings on the connection between science and their everyday lives and positive attitudes toward science learning. We also found that there were certain issues to be taken into account in terms of children’s cognitive development for further development.


Everyday Science Class program learning with parents positive attitudes scientific literacy 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aikenhead, G. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, J., Holman, J., Lubben, F., Nicolson, P. & Otter, C. (2005). Science in context: The Salters’ approach. In P. Nentwig & D. Waddington (Eds.), Making it relevant: Context based learning of science (pp. 121–154). Munster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, J. & Lubben, F. (2006). Context-based chemistry: The Salters’ approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 999–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  6. Chiu, M. M. & Ho, E. (2006). Family effects on student achievement in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 26(1), 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DeBoer, G. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R. & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Duggan, S. & Gott, R. (2002). What sort of science education do we really need? International Journal of Science Education, 24(7), 661–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Flick, U. (2006). An introduction of qualitative research. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  11. Guo, Y. (2005). Asia’s educational edge: Current achievements in Japan, Korea, Taiwan, China and India. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  12. Hand, B., Prain, V., Lawrence, C. & Yore, L. (1999). A writing in science framework designed to enhance science literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 21(10), 1021–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hurd, P. (1998). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science Education, 82(3), 407–416.Google Scholar
  15. Hurd, P. (2002). Modernizing science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jenkins, E. W. (1999). School science, citizenship and the public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(7), 703–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jenkins, E. W. (2000). ‘Science for All’: Times for a Paradigm Shift? In R. Miller (Ed.), Improving science education: The contribution of research (pp. 207–226). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Jin, M. & Yoon, H. (2002). The avoidance of science and engineering fields of high school students in attending colleges and universities in Korea. Seoul, South Korea: Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education & Training.Google Scholar
  19. Kasanda, C., Lubben, F., Gaoseb, N., Kandjeo-Marenga, U., Kapeda, H. & Campbell, B. (2005). The role of everyday contexts in learner-centred teaching: The practice in Namibian secondary schools. International Journal of Science Education, 27(15), 1805–1823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim, M. (2007). Rethinking K-6 scientific literacy: A case study of using science books as tool to cultivate fundamental sense of scientific literacy. Korean Journal of Science Education, 27(8), 741–753.Google Scholar
  21. Kim, H.-B., Min, J.-S., Park, J.-Y., Heo, N. & Song, J. (2004). Science-related attitudes of Korean housewives. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 24(1), 183–192.Google Scholar
  22. Kim, M. & Roth, W.-M. (2008). Envisioning technological literacy in science education: Building sustainable human–technology–lifeworld relationships. Journal of Educational Thought, 42(2), 185–206.Google Scholar
  23. Kolsto, S. (2000). Consensus projects: Teaching science for citizenship. International Journal of Science Education, 22(6), 654–664.Google Scholar
  24. Kolsto, S. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science & Education, 85(3), 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Korea Science Foundation (KSF) (2004). Study of the national survey on the students’ recognition toward science & technology. Seoul, South Korea: Korea Science Foundation.Google Scholar
  26. Ling, Q. M., Sharpe, P., Eng, E. & Heng, M. (1995). Home and parental influences on the achievement of lower primary school children in Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 15(2), 12–32.Google Scholar
  27. Lubben, F., Campbell, B. & Dlamini, B. (1996). Contextualizing science teaching in Swaziland: Some student reactions. International Journal of Science Education, 18(3), 311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. OECD. (2007). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world (volume 1: analysis). Paris, France: OECP.Google Scholar
  29. Park, S. (2002). The avoidance of science fields and possible solutions. Vision & strategy, Spring. Retrieved on July, 10, 2008 from
  30. Park, S.-J. (2004). A study of science and engineering avoidance situation. The Journal of Labor and Economy, 27(1), 56–76.Google Scholar
  31. Ratcliffe, M. & Grace, M. (2003). Science education for citizenship: Teaching socio-scientific issues. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Ro, H.-K. (2006). Analyzing the structural relationships among parent factors, student factors, and private tutoring expense. The Journal of Educational Administration, 24(1), 97–118.Google Scholar
  33. Sharpe, P. (1992). Parents and children learning together a study of the effectiveness of parental involvement on children's problem solving skills. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 12(2), 64–74.Google Scholar
  34. Shim, M. (2003). Parents’ educational support on children’s learning in elementary levels in Korea. The Journal of Elementary Education, 16(2), 333–358.Google Scholar
  35. Song, J. (1997). Review and analysis of the studies on contexts in science education. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 17(3), 273–288.Google Scholar
  36. Song, J. (2006a). Humanistic science education through context-rich approaches. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 25(4), 384–395.Google Scholar
  37. Song, J. (2006b). Community-based science programs: Lessons from SNU’s experience. A paper presented at East Asian science education conference, Feb. 7–9, 2006. Hualien, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  38. The Ministry of Education and Human Resources (2007). Elementary science curriculum. Seoul, Korea: The Ministry of Education and Human Resources.Google Scholar
  39. Yager, R. (2000). A vision for what science education should be like for the first 25 years of a new millennium. School Science and Mathematics, 100(6), 327–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zeidler, D., Sadler, T., Simmons, M. & Howes, E. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mijung Kim
    • 1
  • Heesook Yoon
    • 2
  • Young Rae Ji
    • 3
  • Jinwoong Song
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Curriculum and InstructionThe University of VictoriaVictoriaCanada
  2. 2.Division of Science EducationKangwon National UniversityGangwon-doSouth Korea
  3. 3.Department of Physics Education, College of EducationSeoul National UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations