Advertisement

THE IMPACT OF CONTEXTUAL FACTORS ON THE USE OF STUDENTS’ CONCEPTIONS

  • Yilmaz SaglamEmail author
  • Emre Harun Karaaslan
  • Alipasa Ayas
Article

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the impacts of contextual factors on the use of students’ conceptions. A total of 106 students received a questionnaire involving open-ended questions on acid–base and equilibrium concepts. Of these students, 16 students who provided complete and accurate responses to the questions participated in an interview. In order to observe the effects of different contexts, in the interview, the conception of acid–base was probed in an equilibrium system. As a result, the students’ utterances indicated that (1) a specific problem situation could activate a different part(s) of a concept image, (2) an evoked concept image perfectly working in a particular context could become inadequate in a broader one, and (3) a misconception that could not be observed in a particular context might surface itself in a different one. The results further pointed to the fact that our current definitions and descriptions for acids and bases could be one of the sources of these misconceptions.

Key words

concept image context problem solving science education 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bingolbali, E. & Monaghan, J. (2007). Cognition and institutional setting. In A. Watson & P. Winbourne (Eds.), New directions for situated cognition in mathematics education (pp. 233–260). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Bishop, M. (2002). An introduction to chemistry (1st ed.). New York: Benjamin Cummings.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, T. L., LeMay, H. E. & Bursten, B. E. (1997). Chemistry: The central science (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Burns, R. A. (1999). Fundamentals of chemistry (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Chiu, M. H. (2005). A national survey of students’ conceptions in chemistry in Taiwan. Chemical Education International, 6(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
  6. Cokelez, A. (2010). A comparative study of French and Turkish students’ ideas on acid–base reactions. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(1), 102–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Corwin, C. H. (1998). Introductory chemistry: Concepts & connections (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  8. David, M. M. & Watson, A. (2007). Participating in what? Using situated cognition theory to illuminate differences in classroom practices. In A. Watson & P. Winbourne (Eds.), New directions for situated cognition in mathematics education (pp. 31–58). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Demircioglu, G., Ozmen, H. & Ayas, A. (2004). Some concepts misconceptions encountered in chemistry: A research on acid and base. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 4(1), 73–80.Google Scholar
  10. Drechsler, M. & Schmidt, H.-J. (2005). Textbooks’ and teachers’ understanding of acid-base models used in chemistry teaching. Chemistry Education Research & Practice, 6(1), 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Georghiades, P. (2004). Making pupils’ conceptions of electricity more durable by means of situated metacognition. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Georghiades, P. (2006). The role of metacognitive activities in the contextual use of primary pupils’ conceptions of science. Research in Science Education, 36, 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hawkes, S. J. (1992). Arrhenius confuses students. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(7), 542–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hawkes, S. J. (1994). Teaching the truth about pH. Journal of Chemical Education, 71(9), 747–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Joesten, M. D. & Wood, J. L. (1996). World of chemistry (2nd ed.). New York: Saunders College Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Kesidou, S. & Duit, R. (1993). Students’ conceptions of the second law of thermodynamics—an interpretive study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kolb, D. (1978). Chemical principles revisited. Journal of Chemical Education, 55(7), 459–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kolb, D. (1979). Chemical principles revisited. Journal of Chemical Education, 56(1), 49–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kousathana, M., Demerouti, M. & Tsaparlis, G. (2005). Instructional misconceptions in acid-base equilibria: An analysis from a history and philosophy of science perspective. Science & Education, 14, 173–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Leach, J., Driver, R., Scott, P. & Wood-Robinson, C. (1996). Children’s ideas about ecology 3: Ideas found in children aged 5–16 about the interdependency of organisms. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lemke, J. L. (1997). Cognition, context, and learning: A social semiotic perspective. In D. Kirshner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 37–55). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  23. Lin, J. W., Chiu, M. H. & Liang, J. C. (2006). Exploring mental models and causes of students’ misconceptions in acids and bases [On-line]. Available at: http://science.gise.ntnu.edu.tw/profile/workshop/NARST2004full%20text0213acid%20and%20base.pdf. Accessed August, 2009.
  24. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (p. 64). Thousands Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Moore, J. W., Stanitski, C. L. & Jurs, P. C. (2002). Chemistry: The molecular science (1st ed.). New York: Harcourt College Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students do not learn chemistry: Chemical misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nakhleh, M. B. (1994). Students’ models of matter in the context of acid-base chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 71(6), 495–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nakhleh, M. B., Samarapungavan, A. & Saglam, Y. (2005). Middle school students’ beliefs about matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 581–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Palmer, D. H. (1999). Exploring the link between students’ scientific and nonscientific conceptions. Science & Education, 83, 639–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Variety in qualitative inquiry: Theoretical orientations. In C. D. Laughton, V. Novak, D. E. Axelsen, K. Journey & K. Peterson (Eds.), Qualitative research & evaluation methods (pp. 75–138). Thousands Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Petrucci, R. H. & Harwood, W. S. (1997). General chemistry: Principles and modern applications (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  32. Purdue University (2005). Chemistry 116 Laboratory Manual, Chemistry Department, Purdue University, Indiana: Hayden-McNeil Publishing.Google Scholar
  33. Russo, S. & Silver, M. (2000). Introductory chemistry. New York: Benjamin Cummings.Google Scholar
  34. Saglam, Y. (2009). Students’ operations of evoked concept ımages in an acid-base equilibrium system. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 21(4), 3041–3056.Google Scholar
  35. Samarapungavan, A., Westby, E. & Bodner, G. M. (2006). Contextual epistemic development in science: A comparison of chemistry students and research chemists. Science & Education, 90(3), 468–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schmidt, H.-J. (1991). A label as a hidden persuader: Chemists’ neutralization concept. International Journal of Science Education, 13, 459–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schmidt, H.-J. (1997). Students’ misconceptions—looking for a pattern. Science & Education, 81, 123–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sheppard, K. (2006). High school students’ understanding of titrations and related acid–base phenomena. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(1), 32–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Silberberg, M. S. (2003). Chemistry: The molecular nature of matter and change (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  40. Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A. & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Suchocki, J. A. (2001). Conceptual chemistry: Understanding our world of atoms and molecules. New York: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  42. Tall, D. (1988). Concept image and concept definition. In J. de Lange, & M. Doorman (Eds.), Senior Secondary Mathematics Education (pp. 37-41). OW & OC Utrecht.Google Scholar
  43. Tall, D. & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 151-169.Google Scholar
  44. Tro, N. J. (2003). Introductory chemistry. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  45. van Oers, B. (2001). Contextualisation for abstraction. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 1(3), 279–305.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yilmaz Saglam
    • 1
    Email author
  • Emre Harun Karaaslan
    • 2
  • Alipasa Ayas
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Elementary Education (Eğitim Fakültesi, İlköğretim Bölümü)University of Gaziantep (Gaziantep Üniversitesi)GaziantepTurkey
  2. 2.Fatih Faculty of EducationKaradeniz Technical UniversityAkcaabat-TrabzonTurkey

Personalised recommendations