Advertisement

EFFECT OF CULTURE ON HIGH-SCHOOL STUDENTS’ QUESTION-ASKING ABILITY RESULTING FROM AN INQUIRY-ORIENTED CHEMISTRY LABORATORY

  • Iyad Dkeidek
  • Rachel Mamlok-Naaman
  • Avi HofsteinEmail author
Article

Abstract

In order to cope with complex issues in the science–technology–environment–society context, one must develop students’ high-order learning skills, such as question-asking ability (QAA), critical thinking, evaluative thinking, decision-making, and problem-solving capabilities within science education. In this study, we are concerned with evaluating the effect of student–teacher interaction—which is regulated by culture and traditions—on the QAA in science classroom in general and, specifically in our case, in chemistry laboratory classroom. We take Arab and Jewish sectors that are according to the literature different in their culture and tradition, as a model for our investigation. Specially developed and validated tools, including a novel practical test and an adapted article followed by a questionnaire for evaluating QAA, were administered to the research student population, and the responses were analyzed quantitatively. Observations were conducted in order to better understand the quantitative results that we got. Our findings indicate that there was a difference in the QAA between the 2 sectors. According to our findings, we assume that cultures, tradition, norms, social structure, modes of living, and related factors play a significant role as far as the development of students’ QAA and apparently any intended attempt targeting the QAA paradigm shift must take into consideration the multicultural context within which it is to be implemented.

KEY WORDS

chemistry education higher-order learning skills multicultural context inquiry-oriented chemistry laboratory question-asking ability (QAA) science teaching 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abu-Asbah, K. (2007). The Arab education in Israel: Dilemmas of a national minority. Jerusalem, Israel: The Floersheimer Institute for Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  2. Ayisi, E. O. (1992). An introduction to the study of African culture. Nairobi, Kenya: East African Educational.Google Scholar
  3. Biddulph, F. & Osborne, R. (1982). Some issues relating to children’s questions and explanations. LISP(P) Working paper no. 106. Waikato, New Zealand: University of Waikato.Google Scholar
  4. Biddulph, F., Symington, D. & Osborne, R. (1986). The place of children’s questions in primary science education. Research in Science and Technological Education, 4, 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birenbaum, M., Nasser, F. & Tatsuoka, C. (2007). Effects of gender and ethnicity on fourth graders’ knowledge states in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38, 301–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bybee, R. (2000). Teaching science as inquiry. In J. Minstrel & E. H. Van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 20–46). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
  7. Carter, L. (2007). Sociocultural influences on science education: Innovation for contemporary times. Science & Education, 92, 165–181.Google Scholar
  8. Cassels, J. R. T. & Johnstone, A. H. (1984). The effect of language on student performance on multiple choice tests in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 61, 613–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chin, C. & Osborne, J. (2008). Students’ questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fisher, R. (1990). Teaching children to think. London: Simon & Shuster.Google Scholar
  11. Garnett, P. J., Garnett, P. J. & Hackling, M. W. (1995). Refocusing the chemistry lab: A case for laboratory-based investigations. Australian Science Teacher Journal, 41, 26–32.Google Scholar
  12. Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.Google Scholar
  13. Grosser, M. & Glombard, B. (2008). The relationship between culture and the development of critical thinking abilities of prospective teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1364–1375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hodson, D. (1990). A critical look at practical working school science. School Science Review, 70, 33–40.Google Scholar
  15. Hodson, D. (1993). In search of a rationale for multicultural science education. Science & Education, 77, 685–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hofstein, A. (1988). Practical work and science education. In P. Fensham (Ed.), Developments and dilemmas in science education (pp. 189–217). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hofstein, A. & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundation for the 21st century. Science Education, 88, 28–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hofstein, A., Navon, O., Kipnis, M. & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Developing student’s ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 791–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hofstein, A., Shore, R. & Kipnis, M. (2004). Providing high school chemistry students with opportunities to develop learning skills in an inquiry-type laboratory—a case study. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hofstein, A. & Walberg, H. J. (1995). Instructional strategies. In B. J. Fraser & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Improving science education (pp. 1–20). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.Google Scholar
  21. Horowitz, B. (2005). A tradition of questioning tradition. The Forward, May 27, 2005. Retrieved June 17, 2010 from http://forward.com/articles/3565/.
  22. Krajcik, J., Mamlok, R. & Hug, B. (2001). Learning science through inquiry. In L. Corno (Ed.), Education across a century: The centennial volume. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lazarowitz, R. & Tamir, P. (1994). Research on the use of laboratory instruction in science. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 94–128). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Levy Nahum, T. (2000). The development of tools for assessing students’ performance in inquiry-type experiments in the context of the high school chemistry laboratory (in Hebrew). Unpublished master’s dissertation, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.Google Scholar
  25. Lunetta, V. N. (1998). The school science laboratory: Historical perspectives and context for contemporary teaching. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 249–264). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  26. Lunetta, V. N., Hofstein, A. & Clough, M. P. (2007). Learning and teaching in school laboratory: An analysis of research, theory and practice. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 393–441). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Lyons, T. (2006). Different countries, same science classes: Students’ experience of school science classes in their own words. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 591–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Makkawi, I. (2002). Role conflict and the dilemma of Palestinian teachers in Israel. Comparative Education, 38, 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maley, A. (1983). XANADU—“A miracle of rare device”: The teaching of English in China. Language Learning and Communication, 2, 97–104.Google Scholar
  30. Millar, R. & Osborne, J. F. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King’s College London.Google Scholar
  31. National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  32. National Research Council (NRC) (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  33. Nieto (2000). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  34. Paine, L. W. (1990). The teacher as virtuoso: A Chinese model for teaching. Teachers College, 92(1), 49–81.Google Scholar
  35. Penick, J. E., Crow, L. W. & Bonnsteter, R. J. (1996). Questions are the answers. Science Teacher, 63, 26–29.Google Scholar
  36. Reichel, N. & Arnon, S. (2009). A multicultural view of the good teacher in Israel. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and practice, 15, 59–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rosenshine, B., Meister, C. & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66, 181–221.Google Scholar
  38. Roth, W. & Tobin, K. (2009). Solidarity and conflict: Aligned and misaligned prosody as a transactional resource in intra- and intercultural communication involving power differences. Cultural Studies of Science Education. doi: 10.1007/s11422-009-9203-8.Google Scholar
  39. Schmidt, H. G. (1993). Foundations of problem-based learning: Rationale and description. Medical Education, 17, 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Shavit, Y. & Yaar, E. Y. (2001). Ethnicity, education and the determinants of self-employment in Israel. International Journal of Sociology, 31, 59–91.Google Scholar
  42. Shepardson, D. P. & Pizzini, E. L. (1991). Questioning levels of junior high school science textbooks and their implications for learning textual information. Science & Education, 75, 673–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shodell, M. (1995). The question-driven classroom: Student questions as course curriculum on biology. The American Teacher, 57, 278–281.Google Scholar
  44. Sigel, I. E., Kress, J. S. & Elias, M. J. (2007). Beyond questioning: Inquiry strategies and cognitive and affective elements of Jewish education. Journal of Jewish Education, 73, 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Song, B. (1995). What does reading mean for East Asian students? College ESL, 5, 35–48.Google Scholar
  46. Tal, T. & Alkaher, I. (2009). Collaborative environmental projects in a multicultural society: Working from within separate or mutual landscapes? Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5, 325–349. doi: 10.1007/s11422-009-9202-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tal, T. & Kedmi, I. (2006). Teaching socioscientific issues: Classroom culture and students’ performances. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1, 615–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tamir, P. (1986). Cognitive performances of Jewish and Arab high school students who studied an inquiry oriented biology curriculum for several years. Research in Science and Technological Education, 1, 17–26.Google Scholar
  49. Tamir, P. & Caridin, H. (1993). Characteristics of the learning environment in biology and chemistry classes as perceived by Jewish and Arab high school students in Israel. Research in Science and Technological Education, 11, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Teaching and Research Department, Shanghai Education Bureau (1957). The classroom teaching reference series for junior high readers. Shanghai: New Knowledge.Google Scholar
  51. Tobin, K. G. (1990). Research on science laboratory activities: In pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning. School Science and Mathematics, 90, 403–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tobin, K. (1995). Issues of commensurability in the use of qualitative and quantitative measures. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National association for Research in Science Teaching. San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  53. Welch, W. W., Klopfer, L. E., Aikenhead, G. S. & Robinson, J. T. (1981). The role of inquiry in science education: An analysis and recommendations. Science & Education, 65, 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wu, H. T. (1982). Learning styles of Chinese children. In J. Young & J. Lum (Eds.), Asian bilingual education teacher handbook (pp. 121–127). Cambridge, MA: Evaluation, Dissemination, and Assessment Center, Lesley College.Google Scholar
  55. Wu, G. D., Cahen, D., Graf, P., Naaman, R., Nitzan, A. & Shvartz, D. (2001). Direct detection of low-concentration NO in physiological solutions by new GaAs-based sensor. Chemistry A European Journal, 7, 1743–1749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yaar, A. & Shavit, Z. (Eds.). (2001). Trends in Israeli society. Tel Aviv: The Open University (In Hebrew).Google Scholar
  57. Yarden, A., Brill, G. & Falk, H. (2001). Primary literature as a basis for a high-school biology curriculum. Journal of Biology Education, 35, 190–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhao, N. & McDougall, D. (2008). Cultural influences on Chinese students’ asynchronous online learning in a Canadian university. Journal of Distance Education, 22, 59–80.Google Scholar
  59. Zoller, U. (1987). The Fostering of question-asking capability. Journal of Chemical Education, 64, 510–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iyad Dkeidek
    • 1
  • Rachel Mamlok-Naaman
    • 1
  • Avi Hofstein
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Science TeachingThe Weizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael

Personalised recommendations