• Joe ChampionEmail author
  • Frieda Parker
  • Bernadette Mendoza-Spencer
  • Ann Wheeler


The purpose of this study was to identify the degree to which college algebra students’ value mathematical skills in their prospective careers. A survey was administered to N = 144 students in 6 college algebra classes at a mid-sized doctoral granting university. Students in half the classes completed a data analysis project, and half of the students planned to major in a business-related degree. Logistic regression suggested that students held mostly positive attitudes about the value of mathematics in their career, with business students expressing more positive attitudes than those reported by non-business students. Unexpectedly, those who completed the data analysis project expressed less positive attitudes on 6 of the 20 survey items.

Key words

career attitudes college algebra mathematics education post-secondary education 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Association of American Colleges and Universities [AAC&U] (2008). Our students’ best work: A framework for accountability worthy of our mission (2nd Ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Bisset, J. D., Borja, M. E., Brassard, D. E., Reohr, J. R., O’Neill, K. & Kosky, R. (1999). Assessing the importance of educational goals: A comparison of students, parents, and faculty. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), 391–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Breaugh, J. A. (2003). Effect size estimation: Factors to consider and mistakes to avoid. Journal of Management, 29(1), 79–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Casner-Lotto, J. & Barrington, L. (2006). Are they really ready to work? Employers’ perspectives on the basic knowledge and applied skills of new entrants to the 21st century workforce. The Conference Board, Corporate Voices for Working Families, Partnership for 21st Century Skills, and Society for Human Resource Management.Google Scholar
  5. Cornell, C. (1999). I hate math! I couldn’t learn it, and I can’t teach it! Childhood Education, 75(4), 225–230.Google Scholar
  6. Correll, S. J. (2001). Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. The American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1691–1730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. CRAFTY Guidelines for College Algebra (2007). Retrieved March 18, 2007 from
  8. Cummings, R. (1994). 11th graders view gender differences in reading and math. Journal of Reading, 38(3), 196–199.Google Scholar
  9. Ellington, A. J. (2005). A modeling-based approach to college algebra. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 13(15), 7–9.Google Scholar
  10. England, P. & Li, S. (2006). Desegregation stalled: The changing gender composition of college majors: 1971–2002. Gender and Society, 20(5), 657–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fennema, E. & Sherman, J. (1976). Fennema–Sherman mathematics attitudes scales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 7(5), 324–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frankfort-Nachmias, C. & Nachmias, D. (2000). Research methods in the social sciences (6th ed.). New York: Worth.Google Scholar
  13. Gijbels, D. & Dochy, F. (2006). Students’ assessment preferences and approaches to learning: Can formative assessment make a difference. Educational Studies, 32(4), 399–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim, D., Markham, F. S. & Cangelosi, J. D. (2002). Why students pursue the business degree: A comparison of business majors across universities. Journal of Education for Business, 78(1), 28–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Malgwi, C. A., Howe, M. A. & Burnaby, P. A. (2005). Influences on students’ choice of college major. The Journal of Education for Business, 80(5), 275–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McClure, R. & Sircar, S. (2008). Quantitative literacy for undergraduate business students in the 21st century. Journal of Education for Business, 83(6), 369–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mick, D. G. (1996). Are studies of dark side variables confounded by socially desirable responding? The case of materialism. The Journal of Consumer Research, 23(2), 106–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Miller, R. B., DeBacker, T. K. & Greene, B. A. (2000). Perceived instrumentality and academics: The link to task valuing. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 26(4), 250–260.Google Scholar
  19. Nederhof, A. J. (1985). Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Oty, K., Elliot, B., McArthur, J. & Clark, B. (2000). An interdisciplinary algebra/science course. Primus, 10, 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pajares, F. & Valiante, G. (1999). Grade level and gender differences in the writing self-beliefs of middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 390–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Paulhus, D. L. & Reid, D. B. (1991). Enhancement and denial of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(2), 307–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Segers, M., Nijhuis, J. & Gijselaers, W. (2006). Redesigning a learning and assessment environment: The influence on students’ perceptions of assessment demands and their learning strategies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32, 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Simons, K., Higgins, M. & Lowe, D. (1995). A profile of communication apprehension in accounting majors: Implications for teaching and curriculum revision. Journal of Accounting Education, 13(2), 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joe Champion
    • 1
    Email author
  • Frieda Parker
    • 2
  • Bernadette Mendoza-Spencer
    • 2
  • Ann Wheeler
    • 3
  1. 1.Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi Corpus Christi,TXUSA
  2. 2.University of Northern ColoradoGreeley, COUSA
  3. 3.Texas Woman’s UniversityDenton, TXUSA

Personalised recommendations