HIGH ASPIRATIONS BUT LOW PROGRESSION: THE SCIENCE ASPIRATIONS–CAREERS PARADOX AMONGST MINORITY ETHNIC STUDENTS

Abstract

Students’ interest in studying science and their aspirations to pursue science-related careers is a topic of global concern. In this paper, a set of data gathered for the initial phase of the 5-year study of Science Aspirations and Careers: Age 10–14 (the ASPIRES project) is presented. In the initial phase of this project, a questionnaire exploring students’ aspirations was developed, validated and trialled with nearly 300 primary school students. Principal component analyses and Cronbach’s alpha revealed that the questionnaire was comprised of a number of unidimensional components and that reliability was acceptable. Further multivariate analyses indicated that students’ aspirations in science were most strongly predicted by parental attitudes to science, attitudes towards school science, self-concept in science, images of scientists and engagement in science-related activities outside of school. Moreover, ‘Asian’ students appeared to exhibit a highly positive set of attitudes towards science and aspirations in science, particularly when compared with White students. Reasons for this observed difference are also explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. AAAS (1998). Project 2061. Blueprints for reform in science, mathematics, and technology education. Washington, DC: AAAS.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abbas, T. (2004). The education of British South Asians: Ethnicity, capital and class structure. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Science Education, 27(1), 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Archer, L. (2003). Race, masculinity and schooling: Muslim boys and education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Archer, L. & Francis, B. (2007). Understanding minority ethnic achievement: ‘race’, class, gender and ‘success’. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B. & Wong, B. (2010). “Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren’s constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Baker, D. (1998). Equity issues in science education. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 869–896). Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baker, D. & Leary, R. (1995). Letting girls speak out about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(1), 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V. & Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72(1), 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Beghetto, R. A. (2007). Factors associated with middle and secondary students’ perceived science competence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 800–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bennett, J. & Hogarth, S. (2009). Would you want to talk to a scientist at a party? High school students’ attitudes to school science and to science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(14), 1975–1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Blackledge, A. (2001). The wrong sort of capital? Bangladeshi women and their children’s schooling in Birmingham, U.K. International Journal of Bilingualism, 5(3), 345–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Blalock, C. L., Lichtenstein, M. J., Owen, S., Pruski, L., Marshall, C. & Toepperwein, M. (2008). In pursuit of validity: A comprehensive review of science attitude instruments 1935–2005. International Journal of Science Education, 30(7), 961–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Blenkinsop, S., McCrone, T., Wade, P. & Morris, M. (2006). How do young people make choices at 14 and 16? Slough, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brickhouse, N. W. & Potter, J. T. (2001). Young women’s scientific identity formation in an urban context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 965–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Britner, S. L. (2008). Motivation in high school science students: A comparison of gender differences in life, physical, and Earth science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 955–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Brown, B. A. (2006). “It ain’t no slang that can be said about this stuff”: Language, identity, and appropriating science discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(1), 96–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Buck, G., Cook, K., Quigley, C. & Eastwood, J. (2009). Four profiles of urban, low SES, African-American girls’ attitudes toward science: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods study. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Meeting. Garden Grove, CA.

  19. Cabinet Office (2008). Aspiration and attainment amongst young people in deprived communities: Analysis and discussion paper. Cabinet Office Social Exclusion Task Force: Short studies. London: Cabinet Office.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Calabrese Barton, A. & Brickhouse, N. (2006). Engaging girls in science. In C. Skelton, B. Francis & L. Smulyan (Eds.), The Sage handbook of gender and education (pp. 127–154). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Caleon, I. S. & Subramaniam, R. (2008). Attitudes towards science of intellectually gifted and mainstream upper primary students in Singapore. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 940–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Carlone, H. B. (2003). (Re)producing good science students: Girls’ participation in high school physics. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 9(1), 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Carlone, H. B. (2004). The cultural production of science in reform-based physics: Girls’ access, participation, and resistance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 392–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Carlone, H. B. & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chaves, A. P., Diemer, M. A., Blustein, D. L., Gallagher, L. A., DeVoy, J. E., Casares, M. T., et al. (2004). Conceptions of work: The view from urban youth. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(3), 275–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cleaves, A. (2005). The formation of science choices in secondary school. International Journal of Science Education, 27(4), 471–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Connor, H., Tyers, C., Modood, T. & Hillage, J. (2004). Why the difference: A closer look at higher education minority ethnic students and graduates. Department for Education and Skills. Research Report RR552.

  28. Crozier, G. & Reay, D. (Eds.) (2005). Activating participation: Parents and teachers working towards partnership. Stoke-on-Trent, UK: Trentham Books.

  29. Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) (2008). Statistical first release: Attainment by pupil characteristics, in England 2007/08 (Annex 1). Department for Children, Schools and Families. SFR 32/2008.

  30. Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (2005). Higher standards, better schools for all. London: Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Elias, P., Jones, P. & McWhinnie, S. (2006). Representation of ethnic groups in chemistry and physics: A report prepared for the royal society of chemistry and the institute of physics. London: Royal Society of Chemistry/Institute of Physics.

    Google Scholar 

  32. European Commission (2004). Europe needs more scientists: Report by the high level group on increasing human resources for science and technology. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ferry, T. R., Fouad, N. A. & Smith, P. L. (2000). The role of family context in a social cognitive model for career-related choice behavior: A math and science perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57(3), 348–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gardner, P. L. (1975). Attitudes to science. Studies in Science Education, 2, 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Germann, P. J. (1988). Development of the attitude toward science in school assessment and its use to investigate the relationship between science achievement and attitude toward science in school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(8), 689–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gilbert, J. & Calvert, S. (2003). Challenging accepted wisdom: Looking at the gender and science education question through a different lens. International Journal of Science Education, 25(7), 861–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gilborn, D. (1990). Race, ethnicity and education: Teaching and learning in multi-ethnic schools. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gilmartin, S. K., Li, E. & Aschbacher, P. (2006). The relationship between secondary students’ interest in physical science or engineering, science class experiences, and family contexts: Variations by gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 12(2–3), 179–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Harding, S. (1986). The Science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Holmes, L. (2000). Reframing learning: Performance, identity and practice. Paper presented at the Critical Contributions to Managing and Learning: 2nd Connecting Learning and Critique Conference.

  42. HM Treasury (2006). Science and innovation investment framework: Next steps. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Jenkins, E. & Nelson, N. W. (2005). Important but not for me: Students’ attitudes toward secondary school science in England. Research in Science & Technological Education, 23(1), 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Jones, P. & Elias, P. (2005). Science, engineering and technology and the UK’s ethnic minority population: A report for the royal society. Coventry, UK: Warwick Institute for Employment Research, University of Warwick.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Jones, M. G., Howe, A. & Rua, M. J. (2000). Gender differences in students’ experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists. Science Education, 84(2), 180–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kelly, A. (1988). Ethnic differences in science choice, attitudes and achievement in Britain. British Educational Research Journal, 14(2), 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kind, P., Jones, K. & Barmby, P. (2007). Developing attitudes towards science measures. International Journal of Science Education, 29(7), 871–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Krogh, L. B. & Thomsen, P. V. (2005). Studying students’ attitudes towards science from a cultural perspective but with a quantitative methodology: Border crossing into the physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 281–302.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D. & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D. & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 36–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Lindahl, B. (2007). A longitudinal study of student’s attitudes towards science and choice of career. Paper presented at the 80th NARST International Conference New Orleans, Louisiana.

  52. Lyons, T. (2006). Different countries, same science classes: Students’ experience of school science classes in their own words. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 591–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Manning, A. (2009). Teachers’ views and experiences of being in an urban science department. Paper presented at British Educational Research Association Annual Student Conference, Manchester, 2–5 September 2009.

  54. Mickelson, R. A. (1990). The attitude–achievement paradox among Black adolescents. Sociology of Education, 63(1), 44–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Miller, P. H., Blessing, J. S. & Schwartz, S. (2006). Gender differences in high-school students’ views about science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(4), 363–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Murphy, C. & Beggs, J. (2005). Primary science in the UK: A scoping study. Final report to the Wellcome Trust. London: Wellcome Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Murphy, P. & Whitelegg, E. (2006). Girls in the physics classroom: A review of the research on the participation of girls in physics. London: Institute of Physics.

    Google Scholar 

  58. National Academy of Sciences: Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy (2005). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academy Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Omerod, M. B. & Duckworth, D. (1975). Pupils’ attitudes to science. Slough, UK: NFER.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ong, M. (2005). Body projects of young women of color in physics: Intersections of gender, race, and science. Social Problems, 52(4), 593–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Osborne, J. F. & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils’ views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus-group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Osborne, J. F., Simon, S. & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Owen, S. V., Toepperwein, M. A., Marshall, C. E., Lichtenstein, M. J., Blalock, C. L., Liu, Y., et al. (2008). Finding pearls: Psychometric reevaluation of the Simpson–Troost Attitude Questionnaire. Science Education, 92(6), 1076–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Reay, D. (1996). Dealing with difficult differences: Reflexivity and social class in feminist research. Feminism & Psychology, 6(3), 443–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Roberts, G. (2002). SET for success: The supply of people with science, technology, engineering and mathematics skills. London: HM Treasury.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Schibeci, R. A. (1984). Attitudes to Science: An update. Studies in Science Education, 11, 26–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Schreiner, C. & Sjøberg, S. (2004). Sowing the seeds of ROSE. Background, rationale, questionnaire development and data collection for ROSE (The Relevance of Science Education)—a comparative study of students’ views of science and science education (pdf) (Acta Didactica 4/2004). Oslo, Norway: Dept. of Teacher Education and School Development, University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Sjøbeg, S. & Schreiner, C. (2005). How do learners in different cultures relate to science and technology? Results and perspectives from the project ROSE. Asia Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Smart, S. & Rahman, J. (2009). Bangladeshi girls choosing science, technology, engineering and maths. London: CfBT Education Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Springate, I., Harland, J., Lord, P. & Wilkin, A. (2008). Why choose physics and chemistry? The influences on physics and chemistry subject choices of BME students. London: Institute of Physics.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Strand, S. (2007). Minority ethnic pupils in the Longitudinal Study of Young People in England (LSYPE). London: Department for Children, Schools and Families.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Strand, S. & Winston, J. (2008). Educational aspirations in inner city schools. Educational Studies, 34(4), 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V. & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312, 1143–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. The Royal Society (2006). A degree of concern? UK first degrees in science, technology and mathematics. London: The Royal Society.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Turner, S. L., Steward, J. C. & Lapan, R. T. (2004). Family factors associated with sixth-grade adolescents’ math and science career interests. The Career Development Quarterly, 53, 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Vidal Rodeiro, C. L. (2007). A level subject choice in England: Patterns of uptake and factors affecting subject preferences. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Zeldin, A. L. & Pajares, F. (2000). Against the odds: Self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 215–246.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer DeWitt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DeWitt, J., Archer, L., Osborne, J. et al. HIGH ASPIRATIONS BUT LOW PROGRESSION: THE SCIENCE ASPIRATIONS–CAREERS PARADOX AMONGST MINORITY ETHNIC STUDENTS. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 9, 243–271 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9245-0

Download citation

Key words

  • minority ethnic students
  • paradox
  • science aspirations