HIGH ASPIRATIONS BUT LOW PROGRESSION: THE SCIENCE ASPIRATIONS–CAREERS PARADOX AMONGST MINORITY ETHNIC STUDENTS

  • Jennifer DeWitt
  • Louise Archer
  • Jonathan Osborne
  • Justin Dillon
  • Beatrice Willis
  • Billy Wong
Article

Abstract

Students’ interest in studying science and their aspirations to pursue science-related careers is a topic of global concern. In this paper, a set of data gathered for the initial phase of the 5-year study of Science Aspirations and Careers: Age 10–14 (the ASPIRES project) is presented. In the initial phase of this project, a questionnaire exploring students’ aspirations was developed, validated and trialled with nearly 300 primary school students. Principal component analyses and Cronbach’s alpha revealed that the questionnaire was comprised of a number of unidimensional components and that reliability was acceptable. Further multivariate analyses indicated that students’ aspirations in science were most strongly predicted by parental attitudes to science, attitudes towards school science, self-concept in science, images of scientists and engagement in science-related activities outside of school. Moreover, ‘Asian’ students appeared to exhibit a highly positive set of attitudes towards science and aspirations in science, particularly when compared with White students. Reasons for this observed difference are also explored.

Key words

minority ethnic students paradox science aspirations 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AAAS (1998). Project 2061. Blueprints for reform in science, mathematics, and technology education. Washington, DC: AAAS.Google Scholar
  2. Abbas, T. (2004). The education of British South Asians: Ethnicity, capital and class structure. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Science Education, 27(1), 1–52.Google Scholar
  4. Archer, L. (2003). Race, masculinity and schooling: Muslim boys and education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Archer, L. & Francis, B. (2007). Understanding minority ethnic achievement: ‘race’, class, gender and ‘success’. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B. & Wong, B. (2010). “Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren’s constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baker, D. (1998). Equity issues in science education. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 869–896). Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  8. Baker, D. & Leary, R. (1995). Letting girls speak out about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(1), 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V. & Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72(1), 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beghetto, R. A. (2007). Factors associated with middle and secondary students’ perceived science competence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 800–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bennett, J. & Hogarth, S. (2009). Would you want to talk to a scientist at a party? High school students’ attitudes to school science and to science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(14), 1975–1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blackledge, A. (2001). The wrong sort of capital? Bangladeshi women and their children’s schooling in Birmingham, U.K. International Journal of Bilingualism, 5(3), 345–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blalock, C. L., Lichtenstein, M. J., Owen, S., Pruski, L., Marshall, C. & Toepperwein, M. (2008). In pursuit of validity: A comprehensive review of science attitude instruments 1935–2005. International Journal of Science Education, 30(7), 961–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blenkinsop, S., McCrone, T., Wade, P. & Morris, M. (2006). How do young people make choices at 14 and 16? Slough, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  15. Brickhouse, N. W. & Potter, J. T. (2001). Young women’s scientific identity formation in an urban context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 965–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Britner, S. L. (2008). Motivation in high school science students: A comparison of gender differences in life, physical, and Earth science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 955–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brown, B. A. (2006). “It ain’t no slang that can be said about this stuff”: Language, identity, and appropriating science discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(1), 96–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Buck, G., Cook, K., Quigley, C. & Eastwood, J. (2009). Four profiles of urban, low SES, African-American girls’ attitudes toward science: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods study. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Meeting. Garden Grove, CA.Google Scholar
  19. Cabinet Office (2008). Aspiration and attainment amongst young people in deprived communities: Analysis and discussion paper. Cabinet Office Social Exclusion Task Force: Short studies. London: Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
  20. Calabrese Barton, A. & Brickhouse, N. (2006). Engaging girls in science. In C. Skelton, B. Francis & L. Smulyan (Eds.), The Sage handbook of gender and education (pp. 127–154). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Caleon, I. S. & Subramaniam, R. (2008). Attitudes towards science of intellectually gifted and mainstream upper primary students in Singapore. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 940–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Carlone, H. B. (2003). (Re)producing good science students: Girls’ participation in high school physics. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 9(1), 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Carlone, H. B. (2004). The cultural production of science in reform-based physics: Girls’ access, participation, and resistance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 392–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Carlone, H. B. & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chaves, A. P., Diemer, M. A., Blustein, D. L., Gallagher, L. A., DeVoy, J. E., Casares, M. T., et al. (2004). Conceptions of work: The view from urban youth. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(3), 275–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cleaves, A. (2005). The formation of science choices in secondary school. International Journal of Science Education, 27(4), 471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Connor, H., Tyers, C., Modood, T. & Hillage, J. (2004). Why the difference: A closer look at higher education minority ethnic students and graduates. Department for Education and Skills. Research Report RR552.Google Scholar
  28. Crozier, G. & Reay, D. (Eds.) (2005). Activating participation: Parents and teachers working towards partnership. Stoke-on-Trent, UK: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  29. Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) (2008). Statistical first release: Attainment by pupil characteristics, in England 2007/08 (Annex 1). Department for Children, Schools and Families. SFR 32/2008.Google Scholar
  30. Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (2005). Higher standards, better schools for all. London: Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  31. Elias, P., Jones, P. & McWhinnie, S. (2006). Representation of ethnic groups in chemistry and physics: A report prepared for the royal society of chemistry and the institute of physics. London: Royal Society of Chemistry/Institute of Physics.Google Scholar
  32. European Commission (2004). Europe needs more scientists: Report by the high level group on increasing human resources for science and technology. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.Google Scholar
  33. Ferry, T. R., Fouad, N. A. & Smith, P. L. (2000). The role of family context in a social cognitive model for career-related choice behavior: A math and science perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57(3), 348–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Gardner, P. L. (1975). Attitudes to science. Studies in Science Education, 2, 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Germann, P. J. (1988). Development of the attitude toward science in school assessment and its use to investigate the relationship between science achievement and attitude toward science in school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(8), 689–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gilbert, J. & Calvert, S. (2003). Challenging accepted wisdom: Looking at the gender and science education question through a different lens. International Journal of Science Education, 25(7), 861–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gilborn, D. (1990). Race, ethnicity and education: Teaching and learning in multi-ethnic schools. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gilmartin, S. K., Li, E. & Aschbacher, P. (2006). The relationship between secondary students’ interest in physical science or engineering, science class experiences, and family contexts: Variations by gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 12(2–3), 179–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Harding, S. (1986). The Science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Holmes, L. (2000). Reframing learning: Performance, identity and practice. Paper presented at the Critical Contributions to Managing and Learning: 2nd Connecting Learning and Critique Conference.Google Scholar
  42. HM Treasury (2006). Science and innovation investment framework: Next steps. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  43. Jenkins, E. & Nelson, N. W. (2005). Important but not for me: Students’ attitudes toward secondary school science in England. Research in Science & Technological Education, 23(1), 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jones, P. & Elias, P. (2005). Science, engineering and technology and the UK’s ethnic minority population: A report for the royal society. Coventry, UK: Warwick Institute for Employment Research, University of Warwick.Google Scholar
  45. Jones, M. G., Howe, A. & Rua, M. J. (2000). Gender differences in students’ experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists. Science Education, 84(2), 180–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kelly, A. (1988). Ethnic differences in science choice, attitudes and achievement in Britain. British Educational Research Journal, 14(2), 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kind, P., Jones, K. & Barmby, P. (2007). Developing attitudes towards science measures. International Journal of Science Education, 29(7), 871–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Krogh, L. B. & Thomsen, P. V. (2005). Studying students’ attitudes towards science from a cultural perspective but with a quantitative methodology: Border crossing into the physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 281–302.Google Scholar
  49. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D. & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D. & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lindahl, B. (2007). A longitudinal study of student’s attitudes towards science and choice of career. Paper presented at the 80th NARST International Conference New Orleans, Louisiana.Google Scholar
  52. Lyons, T. (2006). Different countries, same science classes: Students’ experience of school science classes in their own words. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 591–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Manning, A. (2009). Teachers’ views and experiences of being in an urban science department. Paper presented at British Educational Research Association Annual Student Conference, Manchester, 2–5 September 2009.Google Scholar
  54. Mickelson, R. A. (1990). The attitude–achievement paradox among Black adolescents. Sociology of Education, 63(1), 44–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Miller, P. H., Blessing, J. S. & Schwartz, S. (2006). Gender differences in high-school students’ views about science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(4), 363–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Murphy, C. & Beggs, J. (2005). Primary science in the UK: A scoping study. Final report to the Wellcome Trust. London: Wellcome Trust.Google Scholar
  57. Murphy, P. & Whitelegg, E. (2006). Girls in the physics classroom: A review of the research on the participation of girls in physics. London: Institute of Physics.Google Scholar
  58. National Academy of Sciences: Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy (2005). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academy Sciences.Google Scholar
  59. Omerod, M. B. & Duckworth, D. (1975). Pupils’ attitudes to science. Slough, UK: NFER.Google Scholar
  60. Ong, M. (2005). Body projects of young women of color in physics: Intersections of gender, race, and science. Social Problems, 52(4), 593–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Osborne, J. F. & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils’ views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus-group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Osborne, J. F., Simon, S. & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Owen, S. V., Toepperwein, M. A., Marshall, C. E., Lichtenstein, M. J., Blalock, C. L., Liu, Y., et al. (2008). Finding pearls: Psychometric reevaluation of the Simpson–Troost Attitude Questionnaire. Science Education, 92(6), 1076–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Reay, D. (1996). Dealing with difficult differences: Reflexivity and social class in feminist research. Feminism & Psychology, 6(3), 443–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Roberts, G. (2002). SET for success: The supply of people with science, technology, engineering and mathematics skills. London: HM Treasury.Google Scholar
  66. Schibeci, R. A. (1984). Attitudes to Science: An update. Studies in Science Education, 11, 26–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schreiner, C. & Sjøberg, S. (2004). Sowing the seeds of ROSE. Background, rationale, questionnaire development and data collection for ROSE (The Relevance of Science Education)—a comparative study of students’ views of science and science education (pdf) (Acta Didactica 4/2004). Oslo, Norway: Dept. of Teacher Education and School Development, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  68. Sjøbeg, S. & Schreiner, C. (2005). How do learners in different cultures relate to science and technology? Results and perspectives from the project ROSE. Asia Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 1–16.Google Scholar
  69. Smart, S. & Rahman, J. (2009). Bangladeshi girls choosing science, technology, engineering and maths. London: CfBT Education Trust.Google Scholar
  70. Springate, I., Harland, J., Lord, P. & Wilkin, A. (2008). Why choose physics and chemistry? The influences on physics and chemistry subject choices of BME students. London: Institute of Physics.Google Scholar
  71. Strand, S. (2007). Minority ethnic pupils in the Longitudinal Study of Young People in England (LSYPE). London: Department for Children, Schools and Families.Google Scholar
  72. Strand, S. & Winston, J. (2008). Educational aspirations in inner city schools. Educational Studies, 34(4), 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V. & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312, 1143–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. The Royal Society (2006). A degree of concern? UK first degrees in science, technology and mathematics. London: The Royal Society.Google Scholar
  75. Turner, S. L., Steward, J. C. & Lapan, R. T. (2004). Family factors associated with sixth-grade adolescents’ math and science career interests. The Career Development Quarterly, 53, 41–52.Google Scholar
  76. Vidal Rodeiro, C. L. (2007). A level subject choice in England: Patterns of uptake and factors affecting subject preferences. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate.Google Scholar
  77. Zeldin, A. L. & Pajares, F. (2000). Against the odds: Self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 215–246.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer DeWitt
    • 1
    • 3
  • Louise Archer
    • 1
  • Jonathan Osborne
    • 2
  • Justin Dillon
    • 1
  • Beatrice Willis
    • 1
  • Billy Wong
    • 1
  1. 1.King’s College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Stanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  3. 3.Department of Education and Professional StudiesKing’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations