ENGAGING SCIENCE: PRE-SERVICE PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS’ NOTIONS OF ENGAGING SCIENCE LESSONS
- 747 Downloads
If children are engaged in science lessons, their learning is likely to be better and, in the long term, careers in science and technology will remain open. Given that attitudes can develop early and be difficult to change, it is important for teachers of younger children to know how to foster engagement in science. This study identified what a cohort of 79 pre-service teachers in England considered to be engaging elementary science lessons and compared their notions with teacher behaviours known to be conducive to engagement. First, all brought beliefs about how to engage children in science lessons to their training. They tended to favour children’s hands-on activity as an effective means of fostering attentive participation in learning, although many had additional ideas. Nevertheless, the means and ends of their ‘pedagogies of engagement’ tended to be simple and narrow. Trainers need to ensure that notions of engagement are wide enough to cope with a variety of teaching situations, as when hands-on experience is not feasible, effective or appropriate. At the same time, teachers will need to recognise that one approach may not suit all learners. Without this, there is the risk that they will lack the skills to engage children in science. Nevertheless, these beliefs could offer a useful starting point for trainers who wish to widen pre-service teachers’ conceptions of engagement and increase their repertoire of teaching behaviours.
KEY WORDSfostering engagement in science pedagogies of engagement teachers’ conceptions
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Abrahams, I. Z. (2007). An unrealistic image of science. School Science Review, 324, 119–123.Google Scholar
- ASE (Association for Science Education) (2006). Science education in schools. Hatfield, UK: Association for Science Education.Google Scholar
- Bauer, C. F. (2002). What students think: College students describe their high school chemistry class. The Science Teacher, 69, 52–55.Google Scholar
- Beswick, K. (2004). The impact of teachers’ perceptions of student characteristics on the enactment of their beliefs. Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (IGPME, vol. 2, pp. 111–118). Cape Town: IGPME. Retrieved May 20, 2009 from http://www.emis.ams.org/proceedings/PME28/.
- Bettencourt, E. M., Gillett, M. H., Gall, M. D. & Hull, R. E. (1983). Effects of teacher enthusiasm training on student on-task behavior and achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 435–450.Google Scholar
- Boon, T. (2006). A historical perspective on science engagement. In J. Turney (Ed.), Engaging science: Thoughts, deeds and action (pp. 8–13). London: Wellcome Trust.Google Scholar
- Buckley, N. (2008). Science boosterism versus public engagement with science. Science and Public Affairs, 27, December 2008.Google Scholar
- Burkhardt, H., Fraser, R. & Ridgeway, J. (1990). The dynamics of curriculum change. In I. Wirszup & R. Streit (Eds.), Development in school mathematics education around the world, vol. 2 (pp. 3–29). Reston: National Council of Teachers on Mathematics.Google Scholar
- Chong, T. Y. (2007). Effectiveness of the teaching for understanding curriculum model in enhancing students’ engaged learning. Retrieved May 20, 2010 from http://learnweb.harvard.edu/WIDE/courses/files/res_435_03052007-153602.pdf/.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Connell, J. (1990). Context, self, and action. In D. Cicchetti & M. Beeghly (Eds.), The self in transition: From infancy to childhood (pp. 61–67). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- DfES (Department for Education and Skills) (2007). Languages review. Annesley: DfES.Google Scholar
- Fairbrother, R. (2000). Strategies for learning. In M. Monk & J. Osborne (Eds.), Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say (pp. 7–22). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Fielding-Wells, J. & Makar, K. (2008). Using mathematical enquiry to engage student learning within the overall curriculum. Paper presented at the 11th International Congress of Mathematical Education, July 6–13, Monterrey, Mexico.Google Scholar
- Finn, J. D. (1993). School engagement and students at risk. Washington: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
- Fliess, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Fraser, B. J. (1986). Classroom environment. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
- Goodwin, A. (2006). Engagement, communication and uncertainty in science education. Educación en Ciencias, 7(2), 75–77.Google Scholar
- Guthrie, J. T. & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. Kamil & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, vol. 3 (pp. 403–422). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Harris, R. & Haydn, T. (2008). Pupil and teacher perspectives on motivation in high school history. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. 24–28 March, New York, USA.Google Scholar
- Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in elementary, middle and high school years. American Education Research Journal, 37(1), 153–184.Google Scholar
- Martin, A. J. & Marsh, H. W. (2005). Student motivation and engagement in mathematics, science, and English: Multilevel modelling. Retrieved May 20th, 2010 from http://www.aare.edu.au/05pap/mar05402.pdf.
- Mestre, J. P. (2005). Facts and myths about pedagogies of engagement in science learning. Peer Review, 7, 24–27 (Winter).Google Scholar
- Middlecamp, C. H. (2005). The art of engagement. Peer Review, 7, 17–20. Winter.Google Scholar
- Murphy, C. & Beggs, J. (2003). Children’s perceptions of school science. School Science Review, 84(308), 109–116.Google Scholar
- Murphy, C. & Beggs, J. (2005). Primary horizons: Starting out in science. London: Wellcome Trust.Google Scholar
- Newmann, F. (1988). Higher order thinking in high school social studies. Madison: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
- Newton, D. P. (1988). Making science education relevant. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
- Newton, D. P. (2000). Teaching for understanding. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Newton, D. P. (2004). Teaching tricky science concepts. Leamington Spa: Scholastic.Google Scholar
- Newton, D. P. (2008). A practical guide to teaching science in the secondary school. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Niemi, A. M. (2007). What are effective strategies to support student engagement and learning? Master of Teaching thesis, Evergreen State College, USA.Google Scholar
- Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.Google Scholar
- Rivera, T. C. & Ganaden, M. F. (2001). The development and validation of a classroom environment scale for Filipinos. International Online Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1. Retrieved November 24, 2009 from, http://www.upd.edu-ph/∼ismed/online/articles/dev/intro.htm/.
- Robson, C. (1993). Real world research. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Rocard, M., Hemmo, V., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D. & Wallberg-Rogers, K. B. (1991). A best-evidence synthesis of research on accelerative options for gifted students. In N. Colangela, S. G. Assouline, & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development: The Proceedings of the 1991 Henry B. & Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 406–409). Iowa: University of Iowa, Trillium Press.Google Scholar
- Shernoff, D. (2001). The experience of student engagement in high school classrooms. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
- Sturman, L. & Twist, L. (2004). Attitudes and attainment: A trade-off? NFER 59th Annual Report (pp. 6–7). Slough, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research.Google Scholar
- Thorp, H. S., Burden, R. L. & Fraser, B. J. (1994). Assessing and improving classroom environment. School Science Review, 75(272), 107–113.Google Scholar
- Turner, J., Midgely, C., Meyer, D. & Patrick, H. (2003). Teacher discourse and students’ affect and achievement-related behaviours in two high mastery/high performance classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 30(4), 477–494.Google Scholar
- Wellcome Trust (2006). Science for all: Is public engagement engaging the public? Conference Report, 3-4 April. London: Wellcome Trust.Google Scholar
- Wilsdon, J. & Willis, R. (2004). See-through science. London: Demos.Google Scholar