MATHEMATICS EDUCATORS’ VIEWS ON THE ROLE OF MATHEMATICS LEARNING IN DEVELOPING DEDUCTIVE REASONING
- 418 Downloads
This study examines the views of people involved in mathematics education regarding the commonly stated goal of using mathematics learning to develop deductive reasoning that is usable outside of mathematical contexts. The data source includes 21 individual semi-structured interviews. The findings of the study show that the interviewees ascribed different meanings to the above-stated goal. Moreover, none of them said that it is possible to develop formal logic-based reasoning useful outside of mathematics, but for different reasons. Three distinct views were identified: the intervention–argumentation view, the reservation–deductive view, and the spontaneity–systematic view. Each interviewee’s view was interrelated with the interviewee’s approach to deductive reasoning and its nature in mathematics and outside it.
KEY WORDSdeductive reasoning developing mathematics educators mathematics learning views
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Australian Education Council (1990). A national statement on mathematics for Australian schools. Carlton, Victoria, Australia: Curriculum Corporation.Google Scholar
- Ayalon, M. & Even, R. (2008). Deductive reasoning: In the eye of the beholder. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(3), 235–247.Google Scholar
- Ball, D. L. & Bass, H. (2003). Making mathematics reasonable in school. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Shifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 27–44). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
- Clements, D. H. & Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 420–464). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (1997). Evolutionary psychology: A primer. Retrieved from http://www.psych.ucsb.edu.research/cep/primer.html.
- Davis, P. J. & Hersh, R. (1981). The mathematical experience. Boston: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
- Duval, R. (2002). Proof understanding in mathematics. Proceedings of 2002 international conference on mathematics: Understanding proving and proving to understand (pp. 23–44). National Taiwan Normal University. Retrieved from http://www.math.ntnu.edu.tw/~cyc/_private/mathedu/me1/me1_2002_1/duval.doc.
- Eves, H. (1972). A survey of geometry. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Fawcett, H. P. (1938). The nature of proof. The 13th yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. New York: Teachers College.Google Scholar
- Fey, J. T. (1991). Geometry: Educational programs. In A. Lewy (Ed.), The international encyclopaedia of curriculum. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.Google Scholar
- Garofalo, J. & Mtetwa, K. D. (1990). Implementing the standards: Mathematics as reasoning. Arithmetic Teacher, 37(5), 16–18.Google Scholar
- González, G. & Herbst, P. (2006). Competing arguments for the geometry course: Why were American high school students supposed to study geometry in the 20th century? International Journal for the History of Mathematics Education, 1(1), 7–33.Google Scholar
- Hanna, G. & Jahnke, H. N. (1996). Proof and proving. In A. J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 877–908). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
- Herbst, P., Chen, C., Weiss, M., González, G., Nachlieli, T., Hamlin, M. et al. (2009). “Doing proofs” in geometry classrooms. In D. A. Stylianou, M. L. Blanton & E. J. Knuth (Eds.), Teaching and learning proof across the grades. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Johnson-Laird, P. N. & Byrne, R. M. J. (1991). Deduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Krummheuer, G. (1995). The ethnography of argumentation. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 229–269). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Leron, U. (2003). Origins of mathematical thinking: A synthesis. Retrieved from http://www.dm.unipi.it/~didattica/CERME3/WG1/TG1-list.html.
- Leron, U. (2004). Mathematical thinking and human nature: Consonance and conflict. Retrieved from http://edu.technion.ac.il/Faculty/uril/Papers/Leron_ESM_%20Human_Nature.pdf.
- Luria, A. R. (1976). Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Mariotti, M. A. (2006). Proof and proving in mathematics education. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 173–203). Rotterdam, UK: Sense.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Education (1990). The mathematics curriculum in grades 7–9. Jerusalem, Israel: Author.Google Scholar
- Morris, A. K. & Sloutsky, V. M. (1998). Understanding of logical necessity: Developmental antecedent and cognitive consequences. Child Development, 69, 721–741.Google Scholar
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar
- New Zealand Curriculum Framework (1991). Retrieved from http://www.tki.org.nz/r/maths/curriculum/statement/p8_e.php.
- Perelman, C. & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
- Polya, G. (1954). Induction and analogy in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (2006). National curriculum online. Retrieved from http://www.qca.org.uk.
- Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Toulmin, S. E. (1969). The uses of arguments. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar