CONCEPTIONS OF THE NATURE OF SCIENCE—ARE THEY GENERAL OR CONTEXT SPECIFIC?
- 560 Downloads
The study investigates the relationship between general and context-specific conceptions of the nature of science (NOS). The categorization scheme by Osborne et al. (J Res Sci Teach 40:692–720, 2003) served as the theoretical framework of the study. In the category nature of scientific knowledge, the certainty, development, simplicity, justification, and source of scientific knowledge were distinguished. In the category methods of science, the purpose of science and the creativity of scientists were mentioned. The study was conducted with 221 secondary school students, who filled in a 40-item questionnaire on general NOS conceptions. Furthermore, students were provided with different contexts by a short description of 10 scientific theories. After the theory introduction, students indicated context-specific conceptions as well as the importance and familiarity of each theory. Study results show that higher familiarity with scientific theories is related to a more informed view about the general nature of science. Correlational analyses illustrate that context-specific and general conceptions about NOS are not independent from each other but have a mutual core. Context-specific conceptions are not so different from their general counterparts that these aspects cannot be combined in a NOS questionnaire.
KEY WORDSepistemological beliefs general science nature of science (NOS) secondary
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2006). Over and over again: College students’ views of nature of science. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 389–425). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Clough, M. P. (2006). Learners’ response to the demands of conceptual change: Considerations for effective nature of science instruction. Science & Education, 15(4), 465–494.Google Scholar
- Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Elder, A. D. (2002). Characterizing fifth grade students’ epistemological beliefs in science. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology. The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88–140.Google Scholar
- Kremer, K., Urhahne, D., & Mayer, J. (2008). Relationship between students’ general and context-specific beliefs on the nature of science. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Baltimore, MD, United States.Google Scholar
- Labudde, P. (2000). Konstruktivismus im Physikunterricht der Sekundarstufe II [Constructivism in physics lessons of secondary level II]. Bern, Switzerland: Haupt.Google Scholar
- Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–880). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- McComas, W. F., & Olson, J. K. (1998). The nature of science in international science education standards documents. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 41–52). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
- National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Priemer, B. (2003). Ein diagnostischer Test zu Schüleransichten über Physik und Lernen von Physik—eine deutsche Version des Tests ‘Views about Science Survey’ [A diagnostic test on students’ views about physics and physics learning—a German version of the test ‘Views about Science Survey’]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 9, 160–178.Google Scholar
- Schommer, M. (1998). The influence of age and education on epistemological beliefs. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 551–562.Google Scholar
- Schraw, G., Bendixen, L. D., & Dunkle, M. E. (2002). Development and validation of the epistemic belief inventory (EBI). In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology. The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 261–275). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Urhahne, D., Kremer, K., & Mayer, J. (2008). Welches Verständnis haben Jugendliche von der Natur der Naturwissenschaften? Entwicklung und erste Schritte zur Validierung eines Fragebogens [What is adolescents’ understanding of the nature of science? Development and first steps to validation of a questionnaire]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 36(1), 72–94.Google Scholar
- Wood, P., & Kardash, C. (2002). Critical elements in the design and analysis of studies of epistemology. In B. K. P. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 231–260). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar