Advertisement

INSTRUCTIONAL COHERENCE IN CHINESE MATHEMATICS CLASSROOM—A CASE STUDY OF LESSONS ON FRACTION DIVISION

  • Xi Chen
  • Yeping LiEmail author
Article

Abstract

In this study, we examined the instructional coherence in a Chinese mathematics classroom by analyzing a sequence of four videotaped lessons on the topic of fraction division. Our analysis focused on the characteristics of instructional coherence both within and across individual lessons. A framework was developed to focus on lesson instruction in terms of its content and process and the teacher's use of classroom discourse. The analyses of lesson instruction were further supplemented with the analyses of teaching materials and interviews with the teacher. The findings go beyond previous studies that mainly focused on a single lesson to provide further evidence about Chinese teachers' instructional practices and their possible impact on students' learning. In particular, the teacher tried to help students build knowledge connections and coherence through lesson instruction. Results also suggest that coherent curriculum and the teacher's perception of the knowledge coherence facilitated the teacher's construction of coherent classroom instruction.

Key words

Chinese classroom classroom instruction fraction division instructional coherence lesson structure mathematics classroom 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armstrong, B. E., & Bezuk, N. (1995). Multiplication and division of fractions: The search for meaning. In J. Sowder & B. P. Schappelle (Eds.), Providing a foundation for teaching mathematics in the middle grades (pp. 85–120). New York: SUNY.Google Scholar
  2. Baranes, R. (1990). Factors influencing children's comprehension of a mathematics lesson. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  3. Borko, H., Eisenhart, M., Brown, C., Underhill, R. G., Jones, D., & Agard, P. C. (1992). Learning to teach hard mathematics: Do novice teachers and their instructors give up too easily? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 194–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fernandez, C., Yoshida, M., & Stigle, J. (1992). Learning mathematics from classroom instruction: On relating lessons to pupils' interpretations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 333–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Finley, S. (2000). Instructional coherence: The changing role of the teacher. Retrieved March 23, 2008, from http://www.sedl.org/pubs/catalog/items/teaching99.html.
  6. Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Giwin, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., Jacobs, J., et al. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Washington: U. S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  7. Jiangsu Province Research Group for Elementary and Middle School Mathematics Teaching. (2001a). Shuxue, dishiyice [Mathematics Vol. 11]. Jiangsu: Jiangsu Educational Publisher.Google Scholar
  8. Jiangsu Province Research Group for Elementary and Middle School Mathematics Teaching. (2001b). Jiaoshi Zhidao Yongshu, dishiyice [Mathematics teacher's guidebook 11]. Jiangsu: Jiangsu Educational Publisher.Google Scholar
  9. Leung, F. K. S. (2005). Some characteristics of East Asian mathematics classrooms based on data from TIMSS 1999 video study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Li, Y. (2008). What do students need to learn about division of fractions? Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 13, 546–552.Google Scholar
  11. Li, Y., & Chen, X. (2009). Lesson instruction to develop students' conceptual understanding with mandatory curriculum as a context. Paper presented at the Research Pre-session of National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, April 20–22.Google Scholar
  12. Li, Y., & Li, J. (2009). Mathematics classroom instruction excellence through the platform of teaching contests. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 263–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li, Y., Chen, X., & Kulm, G. (2009). Mathematics teachers' practices and thinking in lesson plan development: A case of teaching fraction division. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, doi: 10.1007/s11858-009-0174-8.Google Scholar
  14. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). Findings from IEA's trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.Google Scholar
  16. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: NCTM.Google Scholar
  17. Robitaille, D. F., & Garden, R. A. (1989). The IEA study of mathematics II: Contexts and outcomes of school mathematics. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  18. Schmidt, W., Houang, R., & Cogan, L. (2002). A coherent curriculum: The case of mathematics. American Educator, 26(2), 10–26. Retrieved July 19, 2007, from http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/american_educator/summer2002/curriculum.pdf.Google Scholar
  19. Segiguchi, Y. (2006). Coherence of mathematics lessons in Japanese eighth-grade classrooms. Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Prague, Czech Republic, 5, pp. 81–88.Google Scholar
  20. Shimizu, Y. (2004). How do you conclude today's lesson? The form and functions of “matome” in mathematics lesson. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego. Retrieved March 11, 2008, from http://extranet.edfac.unimelb.edu.au/DSME/lps/assets/YS_SummingUp.pdf.
  21. Shimizu, Y. (2007). Explicit linking in the sequence of consecutive lessons in mathematics classroom in Japan. Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, South Korea, 4, pp. 177–184.Google Scholar
  22. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.Google Scholar
  23. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  24. Sinincrop, R., Mick, H. W., & Kolb, J. R. (2002). Interpretations of fraction division. In B. Litwiller & G. Bright (Eds.), Making sense of fractions, ratios, and proportions (pp. 153–161). Reston: NCTM.Google Scholar
  25. Sowder, J. T. (1995). Continuing the mathematical preparation of middle-grade teachers: An introduction. In J. T. Sowder & B. P. Schappelle (Eds.), Providing a foundation for teaching mathematics in the middle grades (pp. 1–11). New York: SUNY.Google Scholar
  26. Stein, N. L., & Glenn, C. G. (1982). Children's concept of time: The development of story schema. In W. J. Friedman (Ed.), The developmental psychology of time (pp. 255–282). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  27. Stevenson, H. W., & Stigler, J. W. (1992). The learning gap. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  28. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  29. Stigler, J. W., & Perry, M. (1988). Mathematics learning in Japanese, Chinese, and American classrooms. New Directions for Child Development, 41, 27–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Thagard, P., & Verbeurgt, K. (1998). Coherence as constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science, 22, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tomlin, R. S., Forrest, L., Pu, M. M., & Kim, M. H. (1997). Discourse semantics. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as structure and process (pp. 63–111). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Trabasso, T., Secco, T., & van den Broek, P. (1984). Causal cohesion and story coherence. In H. Mandl, N. L. Stein & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text (pp. 83–111). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  33. Wang, T., & Murphy, J. (2004). An examination of coherence in a Chinese mathematic classroom. In L. Fan, N. Wong, J. Cai & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics (pp. 107–123). Danvers: World Scientific Publication.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Teaching, Learning, and Culture College of Education and Human DevelopmentTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations