Abstract
This study examines the didactic suitability of introducing a teaching sequence when teaching the concept of magnetic fields within introductory physics courses at the university level. This instructional sequence was designed taking into account students’ common conceptions, an analysis of the course content, and the history of the development of ideas about magnetic fields. The evaluation is undertaken by comparing the results with a control group using written questionnaires and analyzing recordings of class discussion. The results show that the elements within the sequence help students to reconcile an overall description with field analysis of magnetic interactions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arons, A. B. (1990). A guide to introductory physics teaching. New York: Wiley.
Bagno, E. & Eylon, B. (1997). From problem solving to a knowledge structure: An example from the domain of electromagnetism. American Journal of Physics, 65(8), 726–736.
Bar, V., Zinn, B. & Rubin, E. (1997). Children’s ideas about action a distance. International Journal of Science Education, 19(10), 1137–1157.
Borges, A. T. & Gilbert, J. K. (1998). Models of magnetism. International Journal of Science Education, 20(3), 361–378.
Boud, D. & Feletti, G. (Eds.). (1991). The challenge of problem-based learning. New York: St. Martin’ Press.
Crocker, A. C. (1969). Statistics for the teacher or how to put figures in their places. Middlesex: Penguin Books.
Duit, R. (2006). Students’ and Teachers’ Conceptions and Science Education in http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html, consulted May 2006.
Ericsson, K. A. & Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Ferguson, G. A. & Takane, Y. (1989). Statistical analysis in psychology and education. McGraw Hill. International Editions/Psychology Series.
Galili, I. & Kaplan, D. (1997). Changing approach to teaching electromagnetism in a conceptually oriented introductory physics course. American Journal of Physics, 65(7), 657–667.
Gil, D. (2003). Constructivism in science education: the need for a clear line of demarcation. In D. Psillos, P. Kariotoglou, V. Tselfes, E. Hatzikraniotis, G. Fassoulopoulos & M. Kallery (Eds.), Science education in the knowledge-based society. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Greca, I. M. & Moreira, M. A. (1998). Modelos mentales y aprendizaje de Física en electricidad y magnetismo. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 16(2), 289–303.
Jimenez-Alexaindre, M. P., Rodriguez, A. B. & Duschl, R. A. (2000). Doing the lesson or ‘doing science’: argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757–792.
Kelley, A. (2003). Theme issue: the role of design in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 3–4.
Leach, J. & Scott, P. (2003). Individual and sociocultural views of learning in science education. Science and Education, 12(1), 91–113.
Lijnse, P. & Klaassen, K. (2004). Didactical structures as an outcome of research on teaching-learning sequences? International Journal of Science Education, 26(5), 537–554.
Maarouf, A. & Benyamna, S. (1997). La construction des sciences physiques par les représentations et les erreurs: cas des phenomènes magnétiques. Didaskalia, 11, 103–120.
Maloney, D. P., O’Kuma, T. L., Hieggelke, C. J. & Van Heuvelen, A. (2001). Surveying students’ conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism. Phys. Educ. Res., American Journal of Physics Suppl., 69(7), 12–23, July 2001.
Meheut, M. (2004). Designing and validation two teaching-learning sequences about particle models. International Journal of Science Education, 26(5), 605–618.
Meheut, M. & Psillos, D. (2004). Teaching-learning sequences: aims and tools for science education research. International Journal of Science Education, 26(5), 515–535.
Mortimer, E. F. & Scott, P. (2000). Analysing discourse in the science classroom. In L. Millar & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education: the contribution of research (pp. 126–142). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Pais de Sousa, M. G. (1997). Forças e campos magnéticos. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad de Aveiro.
Pocovi, M. C. & Finley, L. (2002). Lines of force: Faraday’s and student’s views. Science and Education, 11(5), 459–474. Proceedings of International Conference on Undergraduate Physics Education. New York: American Institute of Physics.
Savery, J. R. & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem-based learning: an instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35, 31–36.
Sears, W. S., Zemansky, M. W., Young, H. D. & Freedman, R. A. (1999). University Physics, Volume 2. Addison-Wesley. Edited in Spanish by Addison-Wesley (Mexico).
Tipler, P. A. (1999). Physics for Scientists and Engineers, vol. 2. W.H. Freeman and Company/ Worth Publishers. Edited in Spanish by Editorial Reverté (Barcelona).
Törnkvist, S., Petterson, K. A. & Tranströmer, G. (1993). Confusion by representation: on student’s comprehension of the electric field concept. American Journal of Physics, 61(4), 335–338.
Velazco, S. (1998). El campo electromagnético en la enseñanza y el aprendizaje de la Física, tesina pre-doctoral. Argentina: Universidad Nacional de Tucumán.
Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J. & Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in Science. Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning. New York: McMillan Publishing Company.
Watts, M., Gould, G. & Alsop, S. (1997). Questions of understanding: categorising pupils’ questions in Science. School Science Review, 79, 57–63.
White, R. T. & Gunstone, R. F. (1992). Probing understanding. London: Palmer Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guisasola, J., Almudi, J.M., Ceberio, M. et al. DESIGNING AND EVALUATING RESEARCH-BASED INSTRUCTIONAL SEQUENCES FOR INTRODUCING MAGNETIC FIELDS. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 7, 699–722 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-008-9138-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-008-9138-7