Brown, D.E. (1993). Refocusing core intuitions: A concretizing role for analogy in conceptual change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 1273–1290.
Brown, D. & Clement, J. (1989). Overcoming misconceptions via analogical reasoning: Abstract transfer versus explanatory model construction. Instructional Science, 18, 237–261.
Chiu, M.H. & Lin, J.W. (2002). Using multiple analogies for investigating fourth graders’ conceptual change in electricity. Chinese Journal of Research in Science Education, 10, 109–134.
Clement, J. (1983). A conceptual model discussed by Galileo and used intuitively by physics students. In D. Gentner & A.L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 325–340) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Coll, R.K., France, B. & Taylor, I. (2005). The role of models/and analogies in science education: Implications from research. International Journal of Science Education, 27(2), 183–198.
Coştu, B. (2006). Determining students’ conceptual change levels: Evaporation, condensation and boiling. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Institute of Science, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
Çalık, M. (2003). A cross-age study of level of students’ understanding related to concepts in solution chemistry. Unpublished Master Thesis, Institute of Science, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
Çalık, M. (2005). A cross-age study of different perspectives in solution chemistry from junior to senior high school. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 671–696.
Çalık, M., & Ayas, A. (2005a). An analogy activity for incorporating students’ conceptions of types of solutions. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 6(2), Article 6
Çalık, M. & Ayas, A. (2005b). A comparison of level of understanding of grade 8 students and science student teachers related to selected chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 638–667.
Çalık, M., Ayas, A., & Coll, R.K. (2006). A constructivist-based model for the teaching of dissolution of gas in a liquid. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 7(1), Article 4.
Çalık, M., Ayas, A. & Coll, R.K. (2007). Enhancing pre-service primary teachers’ conceptual understanding of solution chemistry with conceptual change text. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(1), 1–28.
Çalık, M., Ayas, A., Coll, R.K., Ünal, S. & Coştu, B. (2007). Investigating the effectiveness of a constructivist-based teaching model on student understanding of the dissolution of gases in liquids. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(3), 257–270.
Çalık, M., Ayas, A. & Ebenezer, J.V. (2005). A review of solution chemistry studies: Insights into students’ conceptions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(1), 29–50.
Dagher, Z.R. (1995a). Analysis of analogies used by science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3), 259–270.
Dagher, Z.R. (1995b). Review of studies on the effectiveness of instructional analogies in science education. Science Education, 79(3), 295–312.
Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science Education, 75(6), 649–672.
Glynn, S.M. (1989). The teaching with analogies model: Explaining concepts in expository texts. In K.D. Muth (Ed.), Children’s comprehension of narrative and expository text: Research into practice (pp. 185–204) Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Glynn, S.M. (1991). Explaining science concepts: A teaching-with-analogies model. In S. Glynn, R. Yeany & B. Britton (Eds.), The psychology of learning science (pp. 219–240) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Glynn, S.M., Britton, B.K., Semrud-Clikeman, M. & Muth, K.D. (1989). Analogical reasoning and problem solving in the textbooks. In J.A. Glocer, R.R. Ronning & C.R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of Creativity: Assessment, Theory, and Research (pp. 383–389) New York: Plenum.
Glynn, S.M. & Takahashi, T. (1998). Learning from analogy-enhanced science text. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(10), 1129–1149.
Good, R.G., Wandersee, J.H. & St Julien, J. (1993). Cautionary notes on the appeal of the new "ism" (constructivism) in science education. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 71–87) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Guzzetti, B.J., Williams, W.O., Skeels, S.A. & Wu, S.M. (1997). Influence of text structure on learning counterintuitive physics concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(7), 701–719.
Haidar, A.H. (1997). Prospective chemistry teachers’ conceptions of the conservation matter and related concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 181–197.
Harrison, A.G. & Treagust, D.F. (2001). Conceptual change using multiple interpretive perspectives: Two case studies in secondary school chemistry. Instructional Science, 29, 45–85.
Harrison, A.G. & Treagust, D.F. (2006). Teaching and learning with analogies. In P. Aubusson, A. Harrison & S.M. Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and analogy in science education (pp. 11–24) Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Harrison, A., & Coll, R.K. (Eds.). (2007, in press). The FAR guide – An interesting way to teach with analogies. Corwin.
Hynd, C., Alvermann, D. & Qian, G. (1997). Preservice elementary school teachers’ conceptual change about projectile motion: Refutation text, demonstration, affective factors, and relevance. Science Education, 81, 1–27.
Lincoln, Y.S. & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Merriam, S.B. (1988). Case study research in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Palmer, D.H. (2003). Investigating the relationship between refutational text and conceptual change. Science Education, 87, 663–684.
Pınarbaşı, T. & Canpolat, N. (2003). Students’ understanding of solution chemistry concepts. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(11), 1328–1332.
Schmidt, H.J. (1997). Students’ misconceptions-looking for a pattern. Science Education, 81, 123–135.
Taylor, N. & Coll, R.K. (1997). The use of analogy in the teaching of solubility to pre-service primary teachers. Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 43(4), 58–64.
Treagust, D.F., Harrison, A.G. & Venville, G. (1998). Teaching science effectively with analogy: An approach for pre-service and in-service education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9(1), 85–101.
Tsai, C.C. (1999). Overcoming junior high school students’ misconceptions about microscopic views of phase change: A study of an analogy activity. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(1), 83–91.
Yin, R.K. (1994). Case study research design and methods. San Francisco: Sage.
Wheatley, G.H. (1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning. Science Education, 75(1), 9–21.