Advertisement

RELATIONS BETWEEN TEACHING AND RESEARCH IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY AND MATHEMATICS AT RESEARCH-INTENSIVE UNIVERSITIES

  • Lene Møller MadsenEmail author
  • Carl Winsløw
Article

Abstract

We examine the relationship between research and teaching practices as they are enacted by university professors in a research-intensive university. First we propose a theoretical model for the study of this relationship based on Chevallard’s anthropological theory. This model is used to design and analyze an interview study with physical geographers and mathematicians at the University of Copenhagen. We found significant differences in how the respondents from the two disciplines assessed the relationship between research and teaching. Above all, while geography research practices are often and smoothly integrated into geography teaching even at the undergraduate level, teaching in mathematics may at best be ‘similar’ to mathematical research practice, at least at the undergraduate level. Finally, we discuss the educational implications of these findings.

Key words

didactics mathematics physical geography teaching-research nexus 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Artigue, M. (1994). Didactical engineering as a framework for the conception of teaching products. In R. Biehler et al (Ed.), Didactics of Mathematics as a scientific discipline (pp. 27–39. ) Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  2. Barbé, J., Bosch, M., Espinoza, L. & Gascón, J. (2005). Didactic restrictions on teachers practice - the case of limits of functions at Spanish high schools. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 59(1–3), 235–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brew, A. (1999). Research and teaching: Changing relationships in a changing context. Studies in Higher Education, 24, 291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burton, L. (2004). Mathematicians as enquirers. Kluwer: Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  5. Chevallard, Y. (1999). L’analyse des pratiques enseignantes en théorie anthropologique du didactique. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 19(2), 221–265.Google Scholar
  6. Chevallard, Y. (2002). Organiser l’étude 3. Écologie & régulation. In J.L. Dorier et al (Ed.), Actes de la 11 e école de didactique des mathématiques. Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage.Google Scholar
  7. Elen, J., Lindblom-Ylänne, S. & Clement, M. (2007). Faculty development in research-intensive universities: The role of academics’ conceptions on the relationship between research and teaching. International Journal for Academic Development, 12(2), 123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elton, L. (1986). Research and teaching: symbiosis or conflict? Higher Education, 15, 299–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elton, L. (2001). Research and Teaching: conditions for a positive link. Teaching in Higher Education, 6, 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elwood, S.A. & Martin, D.G. (2000). Placing Interviews: Location and Scales of Power in Qualitative Research. Professional Geographer, 52, 649–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Halmos, P.R. (1985). I want to be a mathematician: an automathography. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. Hattie, J. & Marsh, H.W. (1996). The relationship between teaching and research: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 507–544.Google Scholar
  13. von Mises, L. (1949). Human Action. A treatise on economics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Mora, J.-G. (2001). Governance and management in the new university. Tertiary Education and Management, 7, 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Neumann, R. (1992). Perceptions of the teaching-research nexus: a framework for analysis. Higher Education, 23, 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ramsden, P. & Moses, I. (1992). Associations between research and teaching in Australian higher education. Higher Education, 23, 273–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rump, C. & Winsløw, C. (to appear). The role and means for tertiary didactics in a faculty of science. In O. Skovsmose et al. (Eds.), University science and mathematics education. Challenges and possibilities.Google Scholar
  18. Winsløw, C. (to appear). Transformer la théorie en tâches: la transition du concret à l’abstrait en analyse réelle. In A. Rouchier (Ed.), Actes de la XIIIème école d’été en didactique des mathématiques. Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage.Google Scholar
  19. Winsløw, C. & Madsen, L. (to appear). The interplay between research and teaching from the perspective of mathematicians. Proceedings of the 5th congress of European research in mathematics education.Google Scholar
  20. Woods, D. & Fassnacht, C. (2007). Transana-MU v2.12. http://www.transana.org. Madison, WI: The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System.

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Science EducationUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations