• Allyson HolbrookEmail author
  • Lisa Panozza
  • Elena Prieto


Responding to concerns that engineering is a poorly understood occupation and that young people are exposed to stereotyped images of scientists and engineers at an early age, this investigation sought to identify how science and engineering is portrayed in contemporary junior fiction (ages 8–12) and to what extent. An examination of 4,800 junior fiction titles in one region in New South Wales, Australia, identified as few as 71 titles that addressed themes related to engineering and the sciences. While the crazy, nerdy, scientific stereotype exists in these stories, mostly in humorous vein, we found that fictional characters were split between the nerdy, eccentric, and the more serious and professional types who were depicted as more popular. The emphasis was on male characters, but not exclusively so. There were limited details that could be associated with engineering. Where building, making, and working with machines featured, they were depicted as male activity and primarily connected to vehicles, mostly cars. We concluded that while young people, particularly girls, were unlikely to gain accurate or compelling images about engineering as an occupation from this source at present, as a medium for informing the young and their parents, the potential of fiction was considerable.

Key words

career choice children’s literature engineers and engineering junior fiction science and scientists sex roles stereotypes 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, V. & Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72(1), 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baylor, A., Rosenberg-Kima, R. & Plant, E. (2006). Interface agents as social models: the impact of appearance on female’s attitude toward engineering. CHI Extended Abstracts 2006, 526–531.Google Scholar
  3. Birrell, B., Sheridan, J. & Rapson, V. (2005). Why no action on engineering training? People and Place, 13(4), 34–46.Google Scholar
  4. Bowtell, E. (1996). Educational stereotyping: children’s perceptions of scientists: 1990s style. Investigating: Australian Primary and Junior Science Journal, 21(1), 1–4. Accessed 6 July 2005.
  5. Campbell, D. (1967). Stereotypes and perception of group differences. American Psychologist, 22, 817–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cunningham, C., Lachapelle, C. & Lindgren-Streicher. (2005). Assessing elementary school students’ conceptions of engineering and technology. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. American Society for Engineering Education.Google Scholar
  7. EEF West Midlands Education and Training Department. (2004). A survey into the Perceptions and Attitudes of Years 7, 8 and 9 Students Towards Careers in Engineering. Birmingham: EEF West Midlands Research Paper November.Google Scholar
  8. Egan, K. (1978). Sensitive periods and motivation. Towards an educational theory of motivation. Oxford Review of Education, 4(2), 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eugster, P. (2007). The perception of Scientists. The Science Creative Quarterly, (2), 1–5. = 693. Accessed 8 February 2007.
  10. Finson, K. (2002). Drawing a scientist: What we do and do not know after fifty years of drawings. School Science and Mathematics, 102(7), 335–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heaton, M. (1946). Stereotypes and real people. The English Journal, 55(6), 327–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jacobs, B. & Scanlon, C. (2002). Perceptions of Engineering - too little too late. Leadership in Learning - Proceedings of 13th Annual Conference and Convention of AAEE, Canberra.Google Scholar
  13. Knight, M. & Cunningham, C. (2004). Draw an Engineer Test (DAET): Development of a tool to investigate students’ ideas about engineers and engineering. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. American Society for Engineering.Google Scholar
  14. Koblinsky, S., Cruse, D. & Sugawara, A. (1978). Sex role stereotypes and children’s memory for story content. Child Development, 49(2), 452–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Langen, A. & Dekkers, H. (2005). Cross-national differences in participating in tertiary science, technology, engineering and mathematics education. Comparative Education, 41(3), 329–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McAdam, J. (1990). The persistent stereotype: children’s images of scientists. Physics Education, 25(2), 102–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McDuffie, T. (2001). Scientists-geeks and nerds: dispelling teacher’s stereotypes of scientists. Science and Children, 38(8), 16–19.Google Scholar
  18. McLean, H. & Kalin, R. (1994). Congruence between self-image and occupational stereotypes in students entering gender-dominated occupations. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 26(1), 142–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Michael, D. (1957). Scientists through adolescent eyes: what we need to know, why we need to know it. The Scientific Monthly, 84(3), 135–140.Google Scholar
  20. Murphy, P. & Whitelegg, E. (2006). Girls and physics: continuing barriers to belonging. Curriculum Journal, 17(3), 281–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Picker, S. & Berry, J. (2000). Investigating pupil’s images of mathematicians. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43(1), 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reid, A., Martin, S. Denley, P., Cloke, C., Bishop, K. & Dodsworth, J. (2003). Tomorrow’s World, Today’s Reality. Science, Technology, Mathematics: A review of teachers’ perceptions, views and approaches. United Kingdom: ETB and The University of Bath. Accessed 8 Feb 2007.
  23. Rinehart, J. (1963). The meaning of stereotypes. Theory into Practice, 2(3), 136–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sheridan, J. (2007). Why aren’t we training more engineers? ATSE Focus, Vol 141, Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering.Google Scholar
  25. Tiedemann, J. (2002). Teachers’ gender stereotypes as determinants of teacher perceptions in elementary school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50(1), 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Weisgram, E. & Bigler, R. (2006). Girls and science careers: the role of altruistic values and attitudes about scientific tasks. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 27(4), 326–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. White, M.J. & White, G.B. (2006). Implicit and explicit occupational gender stereotypes. Sex Roles, 55, 259–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wolcott, B. (2007). Filling the void. Mechanical Engineering, 129(2), 24–28.Google Scholar
  29. Wolters, F. de K. (1989). A PATT study among 10 to 12-year-old students in the Netherlands. Journal of Technology Education, 1(1), Accessed 8 February 2007.

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for the Study of Research Training and Impact, Faculty of Education & ArtsThe University of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia

Personalised recommendations