Advertisement

Talking Physics during Small-Group Work with Context-Rich Problems - Analysed from an Ownership Perspective

  • Margareta EnghagEmail author
  • Peter Gustafsson
  • Gunnar Jonsson
Article

Abstract

This study provides analyses of the conversations when university students work in small groups solving context-rich physics problems. We constructed context-rich, open-ended physics problems related to everyday life situations that lack some information required to solve and complete the tasks. The students’ ownership of learning, their actions of choice and control, was analyzed in two dimensions: group and individual. Conversation analyses and flowcharts of the conversation were constructed from the complete transcripts of three groups. The theoretical framework for student ownership of learning demonstrated that it was possible to show that even if students have group ownership of the task, the individual student ownership of learning is not self-evident. The study also demonstrates the methodological power and value of the flowchart to identify conversation patterns in the groups that were effective in the search for exploratory talks and individual questions. We discuss implications for teacher development to enhance group work.

Key words

context-rich problems exploratory talks ownership of learning physics teaching small-group work 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnes, D. & Todd, F. (1995). Communication and learning revisited: Making meaning through talk. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.Google Scholar
  2. Dudley-Marling, C. & Searle, D. (1995). Who owns learning? Questions of autonomy, choice, and control. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  3. Dysthe, O. (2001). Om sambandet mellan dialog samspel och lärande[About the connection between dialog, interplay and learning]. In O. Dysthe (Ed.), Dialog, samspel och lärande [Dialog, interplay and learning]. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  4. Edwards, J.-A. (2005). Exploratory talk in peer groups: Exploring the zone of proximal development. Paper presented at the Fourth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 4), Sant Feliu de Guíxols, Spain, February.Google Scholar
  5. Enghag, M., Gustafsson, P. & Jonsson, G. (2007). From everyday life experiences to physics understanding occurring in small group work with context-rich problems during introductory physics work at university. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 449–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Enghag, M. & Niedderer, H. (2007). Two dimensions of student ownership of learning during small-group work in physics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. Advance online publication. Retrieved May 23, 2007. doi  10.1007/s10763–007–9075-x.
  7. Heller, P. & Hollabaugh, M. (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part II: Designing problems and structuring groups. American Journal of Physics, 60(7), 637–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heller, P., Keith, R. & Anderson, S. (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 1: Group versus individual problem solving. American Journal of Physics, 60(7), 627–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Milner-Bolotin, M. (2001). The effects of topic choice in project-based instruction on undergraduate physical science students’ interest, ownership, and motivation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
  11. Mortimer, E. F. & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Park, J. (2004). Analysing cognitive or non-cognitive factors involved in the process of physics problem solving in an everyday context. International Journal of Science Education, 26(13), 1577–1595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rennie, L. J. & Parker, L. H. (1996). Placing physics problems in real-life context: Students’ reactions and performance. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 42(1), 55–59.Google Scholar
  14. Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and narrative (vol. 1). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ricoeur, P. (1992). Oneself as another. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Whitelegg, E. & Parry, M. (1999). Real-life contexts for learning physics: Meanings, issues and practice. Physical Educator, 34(2), 68–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Margareta Enghag
    • 1
    Email author
  • Peter Gustafsson
    • 1
  • Gunnar Jonsson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and PhysicsMälardalen UniversityVästeråsSweden

Personalised recommendations