Abstract
A survey instrument was developed and administered to 1,222 K-12 mathematics and science teachers to measure their beliefs about and use of inquiry in the classroom. Four variables (grade level taught, content area taught, level of support received, and self-efficacy for teaching inquiry) were significantly correlated to two dependent variables, percentage of time that students are engaged in inquiry during a typical lesson and the perceived ideal percentage of instructional time that should be devoted to inquiry. Specifically, elementary school teachers reported using inquiry-based practices more than either middle-school or high-school teachers; similarly, elementary-school teachers believed such practices should be used more often. All groups, however, reported believing in an ideal percentage of time devoted to inquiry instruction that was significantly greater than their reported percentage of time actually spent on inquiry instruction. A disordinal effect was found between grade level taught and content area taught; at the elementary level, science teachers reported both an ideal and actual percentage of time on inquiry higher than those reported by the math teachers, while at the high school level math teachers reported both an ideal and actual percentage of time on inquiry higher than those reported by the science teachers. No correlations were found between typical and ideal percentage of time devoted to inquiry and subject matter content knowledge training, gender, years of teaching experience, or maximum degree earned.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abell, S.K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S.K. Abell & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy and the exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Borko, H. & Putman, R.T. (1996). Learning to teach. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of research in educational psychology. NY: MacMillian.
Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L. & Cocking, R.R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Bybee, R.W., Taylor, J.A., Gardner, A., Scotter, P.V., Powell, J.C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness, and applications. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS and NIH.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavorial sciences (2nd ed.). Hilsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Corcoran, T.B. (1995). Transforming professional development for teachers: A guide for state policymakers. Washington, DC: National Governors' Association.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books.
Donovan, S.M. & Bransford, J.D. (2005). How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R. & Karhanek, G. (2004). Whatever it takes: How professional learning communities respond when kids don't learn. Bloomington, IN: National Educational Service.
Ernest, P. (1989). The knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of the mathematics teacher: A model. Journal of Education for Teaching, 15(1), 13–33.
Garet, M.S., Porter, A.C., Desimone, L., Birman, B.F. & Yoon, K.S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a National Sample of Teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.
Hawley, W.D. & Rosenholtz, S. (1984). Good schools: A synthesis of research on how schools influence student achievement. Peabody Journal of Education, 4, 1–178.
Hoy, W. & Woolfolk, A. (1993). Teachers' sense of efficacy and the organizational health of schools. Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 355–372.
Jones, G.M. & Carter, G. (2007). Science teacher attitudes and beliefs. In S.K. Abell & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kennedy, M.M. (1998). The relevance of content in inservice teacher education. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Diego.
Keys, C.W. & Kang, N. H. (2000). Secondary science teachers' beliefs about inquiry: A starting place for reform. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans.
Lee, O. (1995). Subject matter knowledge, classroom management, and instructional practices in middle school science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 423–440.
Lerman, S. (1997). The psychology of mathematics teacher learning: In search of theory. Paper presented at the 21st Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Lahti, Finland.
Llewellyn, D. (2002). Inquiry within: Implementing inquiry-based science standards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Lloyd, J.K., Smith, R.G., Ray, C.L., Khang, G.N., Kam Wah, L.L. & Sai, C.L. (1998). Subject knowledge for science teaching at primary level: A comparison of pre-service teachers in England and Singapore. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 521–532.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: An imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching. (2000). Before its too late: A report to the nation from the National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1998). Technology conference: NCTM Standards 2000. Arlington, VA.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM, Inc.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Puntambekar, S., Stylianou, A. & Goldstein, J. (2007). Comparing classroom enactments of an inquiry curriculum: Lessons learned from two teachers. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(1), 81–130.
Reynolds, A. (1995). The knowledge base for beginning teachers: Education professionals' expectations versus research findings on learning to teach. Elementary School Journal, 95(3), 199–221.
Schmidt, W.H., McNight, C.C. & Raizen, S.A. (2002). A splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education. from http://imc.lisd.k12.mi.us/MSC1/Timms.html.
Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teachingEducational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reformHarvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Spillane, J.P. & Thompson, C.L. (1997). Reconstucting conceptions of local capacity: The local education agency's capacity for ambitious instructional reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 185–203.
Supovitz, J.A., Mayer, D.P. & Kahle, J.B. (2000). Promoting inquiry-based instructional practice: The longitudinal impact of professional development in the context of systemic reform. Educational Policy, 14, 331–356.
Supovitz, J.A. & Turner, H. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 963–980.
Tobin, K. & McRobbie, C.J. (1996). Cultural myths as constraints to the enacted science curriculum. Science Education, 80(2), 223–241.
Tschannen-Moran, M. & Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805.
Willingham, D. (2003). Why students think they understand–When they don't. American Educator, Winter, 38-41, 48.
Woolfolk, A. (2004). Educational psychology (9th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Woolfolk, A. & Hoy, W. (1990). Prospective teachers' sense of efficacy and beliefs about control. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 81–91.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marshall, J.C., Horton, R., Igo, B.L. et al. K-12 Science and Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs About and Use of Inquiry in the Classroom. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 7, 575–596 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9122-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9122-7