Approaches to the Teaching of Creative and Non-Creative Mathematical Problems
- 582 Downloads
This study investigated the approaches to teaching by three fifth-grade teachers’ of creative and non-creative mathematical problems for fractions. The teachers’ personal constructs of the two kinds of problems were elicited by interviews through the use of the repertory grid technique. All the teaching was observed and video-recorded. Results revealed that the teachers had slightly distinctive constructs of creative and non-creative problems, and professed a greater preference for creative problems. Based on the teachers’ creations of problems in classrooms and related features, the study identified three types of teaching approaches: liberal, reasoning, and skill approaches. The liberal approach appeared to indicate the most appropriate teaching methods for creative problems.
Key wordsclassroom practice creative mathematics teaching repertory grid technique
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Baroody, A.J. (1993). Problem solving, reasoning, and communication, K-8: Helping children think mathematically. NY, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Biggs, J. (2001). Enhancing learning: A matter of style or approach? In R.J. Sternberg & L. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 73–102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) (pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Department for Education and Employment (2000). National curriculum. Retrieved September 21, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://www.nc.uk.net.
- Fryer, M. (1996). Creative teaching and learning. London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar
- Hayes, N. (2000). Doing psychological research: Gathering and analyzing data. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (2005). TIMSS 2003 user guide for the international database. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Centre.Google Scholar
- Jausovec, N. (1994). Metacognition in creative problem solving. In M.A. Runco (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp.77–95). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
- Jin, S. (1998). Career counseling and guidance. Taipei, Taiwan: Dong-Wha. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Kelly, G.A. (1955). The Psychology of personal constructs (volume one): A theory of personality. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
- Lilly, F.R. & Bramwell-Rejskind, G. (2004). The dynamics of creative teaching. Journal of Creative Behavior, 38(2), 102–124.Google Scholar
- Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data Analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Education in Taiwan (2000). The national curriculum outline for Taiwanese school mathematics. Retrieved September 27, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://www.content.edu.tw/primary/math (in Chinese)
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1995). Assessment standard for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
- Nitko, A.J. (1996). Educational assessment of students (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.Google Scholar
- Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2005). Retrieved January 29 2005 from the World Wide Web: http://www.pisa.oecd.org.
- Pope, M.L. & Denicolo, P.M. (2001). Transformative education: Personal construct approaches to practice and research. London: Whurr.Google Scholar
- Scott, G., Leritz, L.E. & Mumford, M.D. (2004). Types of creativity training: Approaches and their effectiveness. Journal of Creative Behavior, 38(3), 149–179.Google Scholar
- Shaw, M.L.G. (1980). On becoming a personal scientist: Interactive computer elicitation of personal models of the world. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 158–183). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Wilkinson, J. (1995). Direct observation. In G.M. Breakwell, S. Hammond & C. Fife-Schaw (Eds.), Research methods in psychology (pp. 224–238). London: Sage.Google Scholar