Abstract
The present study investigates whether Chinese high-school students are self-regulated learners. A social-cognitive model that distinguishes environmental, motivational, and cognitive components of this active approach to learning is described. This provides an appropriate framework for investigating this complex issue with eighth and tenth graders attending a high-school in Beijing. By contrasting components of self-regulated learning and components indicating a more passive approach to learning that were both measured with self-report instruments, it could be shown that these students may indeed be considered as self-regulated physics learners. Comparisons of the grade levels revealed that tenth graders are not more active in self-regulating their learning processes than are eighth graders, and that they might even experience a motivational decline in learning physics. The same applies to girls versus boys. The physics-related self-efficacy belief of girls turned out to be considerably lower than with boys, a result that corresponds to findings with students from Western nations. Finally, assumptions about the causal role of motivational factors for using self-regulatory strategies could be confirmed. Possible consequences for further fostering self-regulated learning in physics instruction are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ablard, K.E. & Lipschultz, R.E. (1998). Self-regulated learning in high-achieving students: Relation to advanced reasoning, achievement goals, and gender. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 94–101.
Anderman, E. M. & Young, A.J. (1994). Motivation and strategy use in science: Individual and classroom differences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 811–831.
Artelt, C., Baumert, J., Julius-McElvany, N., & Peschar, J. (2003). Learners for life. Student approaches to learning. Results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD.
Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., Nicholls, J., Wheatley, G., Trigatii, B., & Perlwitz, M. (1991). Assessment of a problem-centered second-grade mathematics project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 3–29.
Eccles, J.S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C.M., Reumann, D., Flanagan, C., & Maclver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence. The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and families. American Psychologist, 48, 90–101.
Heller, K. A. & Ziegler, A. (1996). Gender differences in mathematics and the natural sciences: can attributional retraining improve the performance of gifted females? Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 200–210.
National Research Council (Ed.) (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council (Ed.) (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Neber, H. (1999). Preferences for experimentation: the development of the questionnaire. Munich: Department of Psychology at the University of Munich.
Neber, H., & Anton, M.A. (2007). Promoting pre-experimental activities in high-school chemistry: focusing on the role of students’ epistemic questions. International Journal of Science Education, (in press).
Neber, H. & Heller, K.A. (2002). Evaluation of a summer-school program for highly gifted secondary-school students: The German Pupils Academy. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 214–228.
Neber, H. & Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). Self-regulated science learning with highly gifted students: the role of cognitive, motivational, epistemological, and environmental variables. High Ability Studies, 13, 59–74.
Pintrich, P.R. & De Groot, E.V. (1990). Motivational and self regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.
Pintrich, P.R., Roeser, R.W., & DeGroot, E.A.M. (1994). Classroom and individual differences in early adolescent motivation and self-regulated learning. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 129–161.
Pintrich, P.R. & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students’ motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. In D.H. Schunk & Z.L. Meece (Eds.), Student perception in the classroom (pp. 149–183). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pintrich, P.R. & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: the role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A. Wigfield & J.S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 249–284). San Diego: Academic Press.
Purdie, N., Hattie, J., & Douglas, G. (1996). Student conceptions of learning and their use of self-regulated learning strategies: a cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 87–100.
Rao, N., Moely, B.E., & Sachs, J. (2000). Motivational beliefs, study strategies, and mathematics attainment in high- and low-achieving Chinese secondary school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 287–316.
Riveiro, J.M., Cabanach, R., & Arias, A.V. (2001). Multiple-goal pursuit and its relation to cognitive, self-regulatory, and motivational strategies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 561–572.
Shen, H.-J. (2005). Motivational and self-regulated learning components in relation to language learners’ self-assessment, reading strategy use and reading achievement. Dissertation Abstracts International, 65(9–A), 3279.
Stipek, D. & Gralinski, J.D. (1996). Children’s beliefs about intelligence and school performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 397–407.
Teh, G.P. & Fraser, B.J. (1995). Development and validation of an instrument for assessing the psychosocial environment of computer assisted learning classrooms. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 177–193.
Tobin, K. (1998). Issues and trends in the teaching of science. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education. Part One (pp. 129–152). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer.
Vermunt, J.D. (1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 149–171.
Watkins, D., Reghi, M., & Astilla, E. (1991). The-Asian-learner-as-a-rote-learner stereotype: myth or reality? Educational Psychology, 11, 21–34.
Wolters, C.A., Yu, S.L., & Pintrich, P.R. (1996). The relation between goal orientation and students’ motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 211–238.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Neber, H., He, J., Liu, BX. et al. Chinese High-School Students in Physics Classroom as Active, Self-Regulated Learners: Cognitive, Motivational and Environmental Aspects. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 6, 769–788 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9110-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9110-y