Advertisement

Engaging Pre-Service Teachers in Multinational, Multi-Campus Scientific and Mathematical Inquiry

  • Jennifer Anne WilhelmEmail author
  • Walter S. Smith
  • Kendra L. Walters
  • Sonya E. Sherrod
  • Judith Mulholland
Article

Abstract

Pre-service teachers from Texas and Indiana in the United States and from Queensland, Australia, observed the Moon for a semester and compared and contrasted their findings in asynchronous Internet discussion groups. The 188 pre-service teachers were required to conduct inquiry investigations for their methods coursework which included an initial Moon observation assignment, an Internet Moon discussion, and a final project. The Moon context was chosen for its motivating capability, its inherent interdisciplinary makeup, its inclusion in the National Science Education Standards, and its ability to be viewed worldwide. This study was of a mixed method research design and involved pre-service teachers’ journals, summative reflections, Internet discussions, final projects, and the Lunar Phases Concept Inventory (LPCI). Analysis of the qualitative data was conducted through the exploration of patterns and themes that illustrated pre-service teachers’ conceptual development, and the LPCI was administered as a pre/post assessment. We found that our project led to increased knowledge concerning the mathematics and science involved with understanding the Moon and its phases. We also found that it was beneficial to have Internet discussions with pre-service teachers from around the world, but it was not without its problems (e.g., coordinating schedules and lack of participation by some participants). We discovered that pre-service teachers’ exposure to the new uses of technology for teaching and learning did not necessarily translate to their planning to adopt similar techniques in their own classrooms.

Key words

earth-space science inquiry international communities  pre-service teachers projects  

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abell, S., Martini, M. & George, M. (2001). That’s what scientists have to do: Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science during a Moon investigation. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 1095–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baxter, J. (1989). Children’s understanding of familiar astronomical events. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 502–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonk, C., Angeli, A., Malikowski, S. & Supplee, L. (2001). Holy cow: Scaffolding case based conferencing on the web with preservice teachers. Ed at a Distance Magazine and Ed Journal 15(8). Retrieved December 6, 2006 from: http://www.usdla.org/html/journal/AUG01_Issue/article01.html.
  4. Cohen, A. & Scardamalia, M. (1998). Discourse about ideas: Monitoring and regulation in face-to-face and computer-mediated environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 6(2), 93–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dunn, S. & Larson, R. (1990). Design technology – children’s engineering. New York: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  6. Fanetti, T.M. (2001). The relationships of scale concepts on college age students’ misconceptions about the cause of lunar phases, Master’s thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
  7. Hsi, S. & Hoadley, C. (1997). Productive discussion in science: Gender equity through electronic discourse. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 6(1), 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. International Society for Technology in Education. (2000). National educational technology standards and performance indicators for all teachers.http://cnets.iste.org/teachers/t_stands.html.
  9. Lightman, A. & Sadler, P. (1993). Teacher predictions versus actual student gains. The Physics Teacher, 31, 162–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lindell, R. (2004). Measuring conceptual change in college students’ understanding of lunar phases. Paper presented at the Physics Education Research Conference, Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
  11. Lindell, R. & Olsen, J. (2002). Developing the Lunar Phases Concept Inventory. Paper presented at the American Association of Physics Teachers Summer Meeting (Physics Education Research Conference), Boise, ID. In Franklin, S. Marx, J. and Cummings, K., ed. (2002). Physics Education Research Conference Proceeding. New York: PERC Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. McMillan, S. & Wilhelm, J. (2007). Students’ stories: Adolescents constructing multiple literacies through nature studies. Journal of Adult and Adolescent Literacy, 50(5), 370–377.Google Scholar
  13. National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2000). National council for the accreditation of teacher education unit standards.http://www.ncate.org/standard/m_stds.htm.
  14. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  15. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  16. Project 2061. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Sadler, P. (1992). The initial knowledge state of high school astronomy students, Dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  18. Smith, W. (2003). Meeting the moon from a global perspective. Science Scope, 26(8), 24–28.Google Scholar
  19. Trundle, K., Willmore, S. & Smith, W. (2006). The MOON project. Science and Children, 43(6), 52–55.Google Scholar
  20. Trundle, K., Atwood, R. & Christopher, J. (2006). Preservice elementary teachers’ knowledge of observable moon phases and pattern of change in phases. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(2), 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wilhelm, J. & McMillan, S. (2004). Moon investigations: Students forging new literacy and scientific-mathematical identities. Electronic Journal of Literacy through Science.Google Scholar
  22. Zeilik, M. & Bisard, W. (2000). Conceptual change in introductory-level astronomy courses: Tracking misconceptions to reveal which - and how much - concepts change, Journal of College Science Teaching, 29(4), 229–232.Google Scholar
  23. Zeilik, M., Schau, C. & Mattern, N. (1998). Misconceptions and their change in university-level astronomy courses, Physics Teacher, 36, 104–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer Anne Wilhelm
    • 1
    Email author
  • Walter S. Smith
    • 1
  • Kendra L. Walters
    • 1
  • Sonya E. Sherrod
    • 1
  • Judith Mulholland
    • 2
  1. 1.College of EducationTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA
  2. 2.School of EducationAustralian Catholic UniversityBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations