Factors Affecting Teachers’ Adoption of Technology in Classrooms: Does School Size Matter?

  • Hsin-Kai WuEmail author
  • Ying-Shao Hsu
  • Fu-Kwun Hwang


Researchers in educational technology have searched for factors to explain teachers’ acceptance and resistance to using technology for instruction. Among the many identified factors, however, organizational and school factors have not yet been explored and discussed. This study investigates the effects of school size on science and mathematics teachers’ adoption of technology in classrooms. Using national survey data collected from 940 science and mathematics teachers at junior high schools in Taiwan, we employed factor analyses, log-linear analyses, and three-way ANOVA techniques to examine interactions among school factors and teacher factors. Results obtained from the log-linear analyses suggested that both the interactions of school region with school size and school size with technology users were needed to explain teachers’ use of educational technology in classrooms. It appears that teachers at small schools were more likely to use technology for instructional purposes. Additionally, results of the study revealed that teachers at small schools tended to have positive attitudes toward technology use and that among users of educational technology in southern Taiwan, teachers at small schools designed and used significantly more instructional activities with technology. This study suggests that small schools provide a better environment for science and mathematics teachers to implement educational technology in instruction.

Key words

adoption of technology classroom instruction school size 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agresti, A. (1990). Categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Aldridge, J.M., Fraser, B.J. & Huang, T.-C.I. (2001). Investigating classroom environments in Taiwan and Australia with multiple research methods. Journal of Educational Research, 93(1), 48–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, H.J. (1994). How exemplary computer-using teachers differ from other teachers: Implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools. Journal of Research in Computing in Education, 26(3), 291–321.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, H.J. & Ravitz, J. (1999). The influence of computer and Internet use on teachers’ pedagogical practices and perceptions. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(4), 356–385.Google Scholar
  5. Buzacott, J.A. (1982). Scale in production systems. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  6. Cheng, K.-M. & Wong, K.-C. (1996). School effectiveness in East Asia. Journal of Educational Administration, 34(5), 32–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen, D.K. (1987). Educational technology, policy, and practice. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H. & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Czerniak, C.M., Haney, J.J., Lumpe, A.T. & Beck, J. (1999). Teachers’ beliefs about using educational technology in the science classroom. International Journal of Educational Technology, 1(2).Google Scholar
  11. Demetriadis, S., Barbas, A., Molohides, A., Palaigeorgious, G., Psillos, D., Vlahavas, I., et al. (2003). “Culture in negotiation”: Teachers’ acceptance/resistance attitudes considering the infusion of technology into schools. Computers and Education, 41, 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dwyer, D.C., Ringstaff, C. & Sandholtz, J.H. (1991). Changes in teachers’ beliefs and practices in technology-rich classrooms. Educational Leadership, May, 45–52.Google Scholar
  13. Fitzgerald, M.A. (1997). Misinformation on the Internet: Applying evaluation skills to online information. Emergency Librarian, 24(3), 9–14.Google Scholar
  14. Fritzberg, G.J. (2001). From rhetoric to reality: Opportunity-to-learn standards and the integrity of American public school reform. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28(1), 169–187.Google Scholar
  15. Gallini, J.K. & Barron, D. (2001). Participants’ perceptions of web-infused environments: A survey of teaching beliefs, learning approaches, and communication. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(2), 139–156.Google Scholar
  16. Gbomita, V. (1997). The adoption of microcomputers for instruction: Implications for emerging instructional media implementation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 28(20), 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haney, J.J., Czerniak, C.M. & Lumpe, A.T. (1996). Teachers’ beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 971–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hargreaves, A. & Fink, D. (2000). The three dimensions of reform. Educational Leadership, 57(7), 30–33.Google Scholar
  19. Howley, C. (1996). Compounding disadvantage: The effects of school and district size on student achievement in West Virginia. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 12(1).Google Scholar
  20. Huang, H.-M. (1999). Educational reform in Taiwan: A brighter American moon? International Journal of Educational Reform, 8(2), 145–153.Google Scholar
  21. Kerr, S.T. (1996). Toward a sociology of educational technology. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), The Handbook of Research for Educational Communications Technology (pp. 143–169). New York: Simon & Schuster MacMillan.Google Scholar
  22. Kozma, R.B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee, V.E. & Loeb, S. (2000). School size in Chicago elementary schools: Effects on teachers’ attitudes and students’ achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 3–31.Google Scholar
  24. Lee, V.E. & Smith, J.B. (1997). High school size: Which works best and for whom? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(3), 205–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lim, C.P. & Hang, D. (2003). An activity theory approach to research of ICT integration in Singapore school. Computers and Education, 41, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Loveless, T. (1996). Why aren’t computers used more in schools? Educational Policy, 10(4), 448–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ministry of Education. (2006). An introduction of the Ministry of Education of the R.O.C. Retrieved August 20, 2006 from
  28. National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  29. Salter, D.W. (2003). Log-linear techniques for the analysis of categorical data: A demonstration with the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 36(2), 106–121.Google Scholar
  30. van Braak, J. (2001). Factors influencing the use of computer mediated communication by teachers in secondary schools. Computers and Education, 36, 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Windschitl, M. & Sahl, K. (2002). Tracing teachers’ use of technology in a laptop computer school: the interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 165–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wu, H.-K. & Shah, P. (2004). Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science Education, 88, 465–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yaghi, H.M. (2001). Subject matter as a factor in educational computing by teachers in international settings. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24(2), 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhao, Y. & Cziko, G.A. (2001). Teacher adoption of technology: A perceptual control theory perspective. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 5–30.Google Scholar
  35. Zhao, Y. & Frank, K.A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S. & Byers, J.L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate Institute of Science EducationNational Taiwan Normal UniversityTaipeiRepublic of China

Personalised recommendations