A Comparison of Thailand and New Zealand Students’ Ideas About Energy Related to Technological and Societal Issues
- 192 Downloads
This study is a cross-cultural comparison between the ideas of 49 Thai Grade 9 students and the 30 New Zealand Grade 9 students (approximately 15 years old), about energy related to technological and societal issues. Students’ ideas were explored using the Questionnaire for exploring Students’ ideas about Energy, Technological, and Societal issues (QSETS). The QSETS questionnaire gave students the opportunity to express their ideas about energy related to societal and technological issues. Both groups of students were presented with the same set of issues, but specific places were related to each student’s own country. The study reveals some interesting student ideas that might be generated from engaging in different contexts. It seemed that the 15-year-old students had difficulty in perceiving the relationship between the study of society and energy. Around 50% of both groups of students did not understand, and did not know enough about, questions which referred to the relationship between society and energy. Thai and New Zealand students held different values in decision-making. Thai students placed value on decisionmaking concerning the development of the country. They strongly believed in scientific application for solving social problems. New Zealand students valued decision-making in relation to environmental issues. They were not quite sure that scientific knowledge could solve problems. They thought that science applications caused damage to the environment. This study has implications for the development of teaching approaches in different countries.
Key wordsenergy New Zealand technological and societal issues Thailand
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Aikenhead, G. (1994). Consequences to learning science through STS: A research perspective. In J. Solomon & G. Aikenhead (Eds.), STS education: International perspective on reform (pp. 169–186). New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.Google Scholar
- Bybee, R.W. (1985). The Sisyphean question in science education: What should the scientifically and technologically literate person know, value and do-as a citizen? In R.W. Bybee (Ed.), Science-technology-society 1985 NSTA yearbook (pp. 79–93). Washington, D.C., USA: National Teacher Association.Google Scholar
- de Vries, M.J. (1996). Technology education: Beyond the ‘technology is applied science’ paradigm. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8(1), 1–6.Google Scholar
- Driver, R., Asoko, H. Leach, J., Mortimer, E. & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23, 5–12.Google Scholar
- Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R. & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Bristol, Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Duit, R. (1981). Students’ notion about the energy concept – before and after physics instruction. In W. Jung, H. Pfundt & Rhoneck (Eds.), Proceedings of the international workshop ‘Problems concerning students’ representation of physics and chemistry knowledge’ (pp. 268–319). Ludwigsburg, West Germany.Google Scholar
- Fry, G. W. (2002). The evolution of educational reform in Thailand. Paper presented at the second International Forum. Organized by the Office of the National Education Commission (ONEC), September 2–5, 2002. Available: http://www.worldedreform.com/intercon2/fly.pdf, January 10, 2004.
- Griffiths, D., Stiring, W.D. & Weldon, K.L. (1998). Understanding data: Principles & practice of statistics. Brisbane, Australia: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Hargreaves, J., Barker, M. & Bell, B. (1997). Everywhere, nowhere: environmental education in New Zealand classrooms. Science and Mathematics Education Papers, 109–127.Google Scholar
- Hodson, D. & Hodson, J. (1998). From constructivism to social constructivism: A Vygotskian perspective on teaching and learning science. School Science Review, 79(289), 33–41.Google Scholar
- Hongladarom, S. (2002). Science in Thai society and culture. Bangkok: Institute of Academic Development.Google Scholar
- Nation Master (2004). Available: http://www.nationmaster.com/country, May 31, 2004.
- National Economic and Social Development Board (NESDB) (2002). Government of Thailand the nine national economic and social development plan (2002–2006). Bangkok, Thailand: Kurusapa Press.Google Scholar
- Pitiyanuwat, S. & Anantrasirichai, A. (2002). Curriculum and learning reform in Thailand. Paper presented at Invitational Curriculum Policy Seminar: School Based Curriculum Renewal for the Knowledge Society Developing Capacity for New Times, Hong Kong, 14–16 November 2002. Available: http://ci-lab.ied.edu.hk/cyluk/ICP/Curriculum_and_Learning_Reform_in_Thailand.pdf, January 07, 2004.
- Ratcliffe, M. (1995). Adolescent decision-making, by individuals and groups, about science-related societal issues. In G. Westford, J. Osborne & P. Scott (Eds.), Research in science education in Europe: Current issues and themes (pp. 126–140). London, UK: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
- Sengsook, R. (1997). A study of mathayomsuksa 1–6 students’ conceptions of energy in Donchimpleepittayacom school, Amphoe Bangnumpeaw, Changwat Chachoengsao: A case study. Bangkok, Thailand: Thesis of Master Degree in Science Teaching, Kasetsart University.Google Scholar
- Titthummo, J. (2004). The development of mind (Pattana Jitta) Available: http://www.jarun.org/42-10.htm, March 14, 2004.
- Wertsch, J.V. (1995). The needs for action in sociocultural research. In J.V. Wertsch, P.D. Del Rio & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 56–74). New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Ziman, J. (1978). Reliable knowledge: An exploration of the grounds for belief in science. London, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar