Secondary School Students’ Construction and Use of Mathematical Models in Solving Word Problems

  • Salvador LlinaresEmail author
  • Ana Isabel Roig


This study focussed on how secondary school students construct and use mathematical models as conceptual tools when solving word problems. The participants were 511 secondary-school students who were in the final year of compulsory education (15–16 years old). Four levels of the development of constructing and using mathematical models were identified using a constant-comparative methodology to analyse the student’s problem-solving processes. Identifying the general in the particular and using the particular to endow the general with meaning were the key elements employed by students in the processes of construction and use of models in the different situations. In addition, attention was paid to the difficulties that students had in using their mathematical knowledge to solve these situations. Finally, implications are provided for drawing upon student’s use of mathematical models as conceptual tools to support the development of mathematical competence from socio-cultural perspectives of learning.

Key words

abstraction conceptual learning mathematical competence mathematical model modelling problem solving stages of learning 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Blomhøj, M. (2004). Mathematical modelling-a theory for practice. In B. Clark et al. (Eds.), Perspectives on learning and teaching mathematics (pp. 145–159). Göteborg University.Google Scholar
  2. Clement, J. (2000). Analysis of clinical interviews: Foundations and model viability. In A.E. Kelly & R.A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 547–590). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  3. Goldin, G. (2000). A scientific perspectives on structured, task-based interviews in mathematics education research. In A.E. Kelly & R.A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 517–546). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  4. Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Freundenthal Institute.Google Scholar
  5. Gravemeijer, K. (1997). Commentary: solving word problems: a case of modelling? Learning and Instruction, 7(4), 389–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Greeno, J. (1991). Number sense as a situated knowing in a conceptual domain. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(3), 170–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Greeno, J. & Hall, R. (1997). Practicing representation with about representational forms. Phi, Delta, Kappan, 78, 1–24.Google Scholar
  8. Greer, B. (1993). The mathematical modelling perspective on wor(l)d problems. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 12, 239–250.Google Scholar
  9. Izsák, A. (2004). Students’ coordination of knowledge when learning to model physical situations. Cognition and Instruction, 22(1), 81–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Johanning, D.I. (2004). Supporting the development of algebraic thinking in middle school: a closer look at students’ informal strategies. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23, 371–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kastberg, S., D’Ambrosio, B., McDermott, G. & Saada, N. (2005). Context matters in assessing students’ mathematical power. For the Learning of Mathematics, 25(2), 10–15.Google Scholar
  12. Lange, J. de (1996). Using and applying mathematics in education. In A.J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 49–97). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Lesh, R. & Harel, G. (2003). Problem solving, modeling and local conceptual development. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(2&3), 157–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nesher, P., Hershkovitz, S. & Novotna, J. (2003). Situation model, text base and what else? Factors affecting problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52, 151–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Piaget, J. (2001/1977). Studies in reflecting abstraction. Sussex, England: Psychology Press (Edited in 1977 from Presses Universitaires de France).Google Scholar
  16. Säljö, R. (1999a). Concepts, cognition and discourse: From mental structures to discursive tools. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou, & M. Carretero (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 81–90). Amsterdam: Pergamon-EARLI.Google Scholar
  17. Säljö, R. (1999b). Learning as the use of tools. A sociocultural perspective on the human-technology link. In K. Littleton & P. Light (Eds.), Learning with computers: Analysing productive interaction (pp. 144–161). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Simon, M.A., Tzur, R., Heinz, K. & Kinzel, M. (2004). Explicating a mechanism for conceptual learning: Elaborating the construct of reflective abstraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 305–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Silver, E.A. (1992). Referential mappings and the solutions of division story problems involving remainders. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 12(3), 29–39.Google Scholar
  20. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N.K. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Tzur, R. (2000). An integrated research on children’s construction of meaningful, symbolic, partitioning-related conceptions, and the teachers’ role in fostering that learning. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(2), 123–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tzur, R. & Simon, M. (2004). Distinguishing two stages of mathematics conceptual learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. van Dijk, I.M.A.W., van Oers, B., Teruel, J. & van den Eeden, P. (2003). Strategic learning in primary mathematics education: Effects of an experimental program in modelling. Educational Research and Evaluation, 9(2), 161–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Verschaffel, L., Greer, B. & De Corte, E. (2002). Everyday knowledge and mathematical modelling of school word problems. In K. Gravemejeir, R. Lehrer, B. Oers & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing, modelling and tool uses in mathematics education (pp. 257–276). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Innovación y Formación Didáctica, Facultad de EducaciónCampus de San Vicente del Raspeig, Universidad de AlicanteAlicanteSpain

Personalised recommendations