Abstract
This study compares the views of teachers and professional development facilitators about effective professional development (PD). We analyzed interviews with 72 teacher participants and 23 PD facilitators involved in nine science and mathematics PD projects. The teachers' themes for characterizing effective PD included classroom application, teacher as learner, and teacher networking. Similarly, the PD facilitators discussed effective PD as having classroom application and experiences for teachers as learners. In addition, PD facilitators shared the need to develop collegial relationships with teachers and improve teacher knowledge. These views correspond to some of the standards and recommendations described in policy and research documents on effective PD. Criteria of effective PD in these documents that the participants did not mention included: (1) challenging teachers' content and pedagogical content knowledge with transformative learning experiences, (2) encouraging teacher leadership for sustained support, and (3) focusing on student learning by instructing teachers on how to use student data to inform their teaching practice. Our findings have implications for designing PD that reflects the criteria of standards-based reform.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arbaugh, F. (2003). Study groups as a form of professional development for secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 139–163.
Booth, S. (1997). On phenomenography, learning, and teaching. Higher Education Research and Development, 16, 135–159.
Borasi, R. & Fonzi, J. (2002). Professional development that supports school mathematics reform. Foundations: A monograph for professionals in science, mathematics, and technology education, 3. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
Borasi, R., Fonzi, J., Smith, C.F. & Rose, B.J. (1999). Beginning the process of rethinking mathematics instruction: A professional development program. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2, 49–78.
Clarke, D. (1994). Ten key principles from research for the professional development of mathematics teachers. In D.B. Aichele & A.F. Coxford (Eds.), Professional development for teachers of mathematics: NCTM 1994 yearbook (pp. 37–48). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Collins, A. (1997). National Science Education Standards: Looking backward and forward. The Elementary School Journal, 97, 299–313.
Desimone, L.M., Porter, A.C., Garet, M.S., Yoon, K.S. & Birman, B.F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers' instruction: Results from three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 81–112.
Garet, M.S., Porter, A.C., Desimone, L., Birman, B.F. & Yoon, K.S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945.
Gonzales, P., Guzmán, J.C., Partelow, L., Pahlke, E., Jocelyn, L., Kastberg, D., et al. (2004). Highlights from the trends in international mathematics and science study (TIMSS) 2003 (NCES 2005–005). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Guskey, T.R. (2003). What makes professional development effective? Phi Delta Kappan, 84, 750–784.
Hasselgren, B. & Beach, D. (1997). Phenomenography—a “good-for-nothing brother” of phenomenology? Outline of an analysis. Higher Education Research and Development, 16, 191–202.
Jauhiainen, J., Lavonen, J., Koponen, I. & Suonio, K.K. (2002). Experiments from long-term in-service training for physics teachers in Finland. Physics Education, 37, 128–134.
Kelleher, J. (2003). A model for assessment-driven professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 84, 751–756.
LaChance, A. & Confrey, J. (2003). Interconnecting content and community: A qualitative study of secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 107–137.
Lemke, M., Sen, A., Pahlke, E., Partelow, L., Miller, D., Williams, T., et al. (2004). International outcomes of learning in mathematics literacy and problem solving: PISA 2003 results from the U.S. perspective (NCES 2005–003). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Limberg, L. (1999). Experiencing information seeking and learning: A study of the interaction between two phenomena. Information Research, 5(1). http://informationr.net/ir/5-1/paper68.html. Cited 8 January 2005.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K.E., Mundry, S. & Hewson, P.W. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Marton, F. (1994). Phenomenography. In T. Husen & T.N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education, vol. 8, 2nd edn. (pp. 4424–4429). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
Marton, F. (1996). Phenomenography—a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21, 28–49.
Marton, F. & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Marton, F. & Fai, P.M. (1999). Two faces of variation. Paper presented at 8th European conference for learning and instruction, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Staff Development Council (2001). Standards for staff development (revised). http://nsdc.org/standards/index.cfm. Cited 8 January 2005
Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation (3rd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Sevensson, L. (1997). Theoretical foundations of phenomenography. Higher Education Research and Development, 16, 159–171.
Thompson, C.L. & Zeuli, J.S. (1999). The frame and the tapestry: Standards-based reform and professional development. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 341–375). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Trigwell, K. (2001). Phenomenography: Discernment and variation. Paper presented at the phenomenography research seminar of the institute for the advancement of university learning, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Uljens, M. (1996). On the philosophical foundation of phenomenography. In G. Dall'Alba & B. Hasselgren (Eds.), Reflections on phenomenography-Toward a methodology? (pp. 105–130). Göteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rogers, M.P., Abell, S., Lannin, J. et al. Effective Professional Development in Science and Mathematics Education: Teachers' and Facilitators' Views. Int J Sci Math Educ 5, 507–532 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-006-9053-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-006-9053-8