Advertisement

Effects of advance organiser strategy during instruction on secondary school students’ mathematics achievement in Kenya’s Nakuru district

  • Bernard N. GithuaEmail author
  • Rachel Angela Nyabwa
Article

Abstract

Students have continued to perform poorly in KCSE examinations in certain mathematics topics taught in secondary schools in Kenya. One such topic is commercial arithmetic. Successful teaching of mathematics depends partly on correct use of teaching methods in classroom settings. This study sought to examine how the use of advance organisers during instruction affect students achievement in commercial arithmetic. There is however inadequate documented information in research conducted in Kenya on the effects of the use of advance organisers on students’ achievement in mathematics. The purpose of this study was therefore to develop and use advance organisers to augment the teaching of commercial arithmetic and then investigate its effects on student achievement in the topic. A simple random sample of four provincial mixed-sex secondary schools in Nakuru district was obtained. The study was carried out in a mathematics classroom setting. Solomon four-group design was employed. The experimental groups received the advance organisers as treatment and two control groups were taught in the conventional way. The sample size was 142 students. A mathematics achievement test (MAT) was used. The instrument was pilot tested to ascertain its reliability. The validity of the instrument was checked by experts from the Department of Curriculum and Instruction. The MAT was administered to two groups before the teaching of the topic and then to all four groups after learning the topic of commercial arithmetic. Statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) was used for data analysis. Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, percentages) and Inferential statistics (ANOVA, ANCOVA and t-test) were used for data analysis. The level of significance for acceptance or rejection of hypothesis was set at 0.05 α-level. The results indicated that students taught using advance organisers had significantly higher scores in MAT than those taught in the conventional way. Gender did not affect achievement. Major recommendations from the study are that teaching using advance organisers should be included in the syllabus during training and in-servicing of teachers, and teachers should be encouraged to use advance organisers when teaching mathematics where applicable.

Key words

advance organiser strategy mathematics achievement 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aduda, D., Thuku, J. & Wangugi, M. (2000). New study exposes mass failure in mathematics. The Daily Nation, p. 18.Google Scholar
  2. Akala, J. (2000). The agony of teaching mathematics. Kenya Times, pp. 16–17.Google Scholar
  3. Anderton, B. & Steiner, A. (2003). The subject sampler: Applying the information processing theory and advance organisers principles. Paper presented at distance education conference, Fayetteville, Arkansas.Google Scholar
  4. Ausubel, D.P. (1960). The use of advance organiser in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 267–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ausubel, D.P. (1967). Learning theory and classroom practice. The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  6. Ausubel, D.P. (1968). Educational psychology. A cognitive view. Holt Rinehart and Winston, USA.Google Scholar
  7. Ausubel, D.P. (1978). In defence of advance organisers. A reply to the critics. Review of Educational Research, 48, 251–257.Google Scholar
  8. Ayot, H.O. & Patel, M.M. (1987). Instructional methods. Nairobi, Kenya: Kenyatta University.Google Scholar
  9. Bills, C. (1997). Effects of structure and interactivity on Internet based instruction. A paper presented at the interservice/industry training simulation and education conference, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
  10. Borg, W.R. & Gall, M.D. (1989). Educational research: An Introduction, 5th edn. Longman, White Plains, NY.Google Scholar
  11. Coffey, J.W. & Canas, A.J. (2003). LEO: A learning environment organiser to support computer mediated instruction. Institute for Human/Machine Cognition, University of West Florida, Florida.Google Scholar
  12. Eggen, P., Kauchak, D.P. & Harder, R. (1979). Strategies for teachers’ information processing models in the classroom. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  13. English, L. (1993). Reasoning by analogy in constructing mathematical ideas. ERIC document ED370766, Education Resources Information Center, MD, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Eshiwani, G.S. (1974). A study of sex differences and mathematical abilities among Kenya’s high school students. Bureau of Education Research, Kenyatta University.Google Scholar
  15. Eshiwani, G.S. (1985). A study of sex differences and mathematical abilities among Kenya’s high school students. Bureau of Education Research, Kenyatta University.Google Scholar
  16. Gerlach, V.S. & Ely, D.P. (1980). Teaching and media. A systematic approach. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentic-Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Good, T.L. & Brophy, J. (1995). Contemporary educational psychology, 5th edn. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  18. Grippins, Peters (1997). Guided discovery. In R.J. Lefrancois (Ed.), Psychology for teaching. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  19. Huitt, W. (2000). Using the information systems approach in the classroom: the information processing approach. Available [Online] http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuitt/col/cogsys/infoproc.html. Cited 16 February 2006.
  20. KIE (1992). Secondary school syllabus. Kenya Institute of Education, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  21. KIE (2000). Examination report, vol I. Kenya Institute of Education, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  22. KIE (2001). Examination report, vol I. Kenya Institute of Education, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  23. KNEC (2002). KCSE examination reports, 2000. Kenya National Examination Council, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  24. KNEC (2003). KCSE examination reports, 2002. Kenya National Examination Council, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  25. Kirea, S.K. (1989). A survey of factors influencing the participation of women in technical education training jobs. Nairobi: Kenya Polytechnic.Google Scholar
  26. Kirkland, A.L. (1981). The effects of advance organisers on the reading comprehension of compensatory education students. MA Thesis, University of New Jersey.Google Scholar
  27. Koul, L. (1984). Methodology of educational research. Delhi: Vikas.Google Scholar
  28. Kleinbaum, D.J. & Kupper, L.L. (1978). Applied regression analysis and other multivariate methods. Massachusetts: Duxbury.Google Scholar
  29. Lai, S. & Repman, J.L. (1996). The effects of analogies and mathematics ability on students’ programming learning using computer based learning. International Journal of Instructional Media, 23(4), 355–354.Google Scholar
  30. Lefrancois, G.R. (1997). Psychology for teaching, 9th edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  31. Makau, P.M. (1994). Measuring and analysing gender differences in primary and secondary schools. Research framework no 2. Nairobi, Kenya: Academic Science.Google Scholar
  32. McAdaragh, M.K. (1981). The effect of background experience and an advance organiser on attainment of certain science concepts. University of Michigan, p. 184.Google Scholar
  33. Mayer, R.L. (1975). Information processing variables in learning to solve problems. Review of Educational Research, 45, 525–541.Google Scholar
  34. Mayer, R.L. (1979). Can advance organisers influence meaningful learning? Review of Educational Research, 49, 371–383.Google Scholar
  35. Mondoh, H.O. (1998). Cognitive styles in mathematics classes: Another dimension of explaining gender disparities in mathematics. A seminar paper presented at the centre of women studies and gender analysis, Egerton University, Kenya.Google Scholar
  36. Mugenda, M.O. & Mugenda, A.G. (1999). Research methods. Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Nairobi, Kenya: CTS Press.Google Scholar
  37. Obura, A.P. (1991). Changing Images: portrayal of girls and women in Kenyan textbooks. Nairobi, Kenya: African Centre for Technology Press.Google Scholar
  38. Ogunniyi, B.M. (1992). Understanding research in social science. Nigeria: Ibadan University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Stone, C.L. (1983). A meta-analysis of advance organiser studies. Journal of Experimental Education, 51, 194–199.Google Scholar
  40. The North East Texas Network Consortium [NETnet] (2002). Creating and using advance organisers. Texas: The North East Texas Network Consortium.Google Scholar
  41. White, Tisher (1997). Guided discovery. In J.R. Lefrancois (Ed.), Psychology for teaching. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Curriculum and InstructionEgerton UniversityNjoroKenya

Personalised recommendations