New South Wales Primary School Teachers' Perceptions of the Role of ICT in the Primary Science Curriculum – A Rural and Regional Perspective

  • Neil TaylorEmail author
  • Gerry Corrigan


A series of interviews was conducted with NSW primary teachers, working within a rural context, to obtain their views about the benefits of using ICT in the delivery of the primary curriculum and specifically primary science. The interviews were also used to determine how these teachers were using ICT and if they had any specific training needs. Some teachers were using ICT creatively in their teaching in science and other curriculum areas. However, despite considerable political pressure to increase ICT use in the classroom, most expressed frustration at the lack of in-service training available to them. Given the costs involved in in-service training in regional New South Wales, with groups of teachers scattered over large distances, this finding is perhaps not surprising. This article proposes a possible cost-effective strategy for in-service training to help overcome some of the problems raised by the participants in this study. The suggested strategy involves the use of action research to develop confidence and self reliance amongst primary teachers in a region where government funded training is always likely to be limited due to its prohibitive cost.

Key Words

primary science curriculum ICT New South Wales in-service training 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adey, P. (1997). It all depends on the context, doesn't it? Searching for general, educable dragons. Studies Science Education, 29, 45–92.Google Scholar
  2. Appleton, K. (1997). Analysis and description of students' learning during science classes using a constructivist-based model. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(3), 303–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atweh, B. (2002). Understanding for changing and changing for understanding. In R. Zevenbergen & P. Valero (Eds.), Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology (pp. 1–47). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, S. (1999). How big is Uranus? Primary Science Review, 56, 25–26.Google Scholar
  5. BECTa (2001). ImpaCT2: Emerging findings from the evaluation of the impact of information and communications technologies on pupil attainment. Department for Education and Science, London.Google Scholar
  6. Bloomfield, D.M., Taylor, N. & Maxwell, T.W. (2004). Enhancing the link between university and schools through action research on teaching practicum. Journal of Vocational Education and Trainining, 56(3), 355–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byrne, J. & Sharp, J. (2002). Using ICT in primary science teaching. Learning Matters, Exeter.Google Scholar
  8. Chaplin, M. (2003). Strategies for making effective use of ICT in science lessons. School Science Review, 83(309), 93–99.Google Scholar
  9. Cuttance, P. & Nicholson, P. (2000). The successful implementation of learning technologies (SILT) research project: Defining models of expert practice in science and SOSE. In Learning technologies teaching and the future of schools. Conference proceedings of the 16th Australasian computers in education conference. Computing in Education Group of Victoria, Richmond, Victoria.Google Scholar
  10. Denby, D. & Holman, J. (2002). ICT in support of science education: A practical user's guide. York Publishing, York.Google Scholar
  11. DEST (2002). Raising the standards: A proposal for the development of an ICT competency framework for teachers. Commonwealth Department of Education, Science & Training, Canberra.Google Scholar
  12. Educational Network Australia (EdNA) Schools Advisory Group (2000). Learning in an online world: School education action plan for the information economy. Cited 1 September 2005.
  13. Faculty of Education, Queensland University of Technology (2001). SOCCI market research report. QUT, Brisbane.Google Scholar
  14. Frost, R. (1998). Computer software for science teaching-choosing and using. School Science Review, 79(287), 19–24.Google Scholar
  15. Gitlin, A. & Gore, J. (2000). [Re]Visioning the academic-teacher divide: Power and knowledge in the education community. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, USA.Google Scholar
  16. Grundy, S. (1995). Action research as professional development. Occasional paper no 1, Innovative Links Project AGPS, Canberra.Google Scholar
  17. Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Sage, Newbury Park.Google Scholar
  18. Guba E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
  19. Jonassen, D.H. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar
  20. Lewis, S. (2003). Enhancing teaching and learning of science through the use of ICT: Methods and materials. School Science Review, 83(309), 41–53.Google Scholar
  21. McFarlane, A.E., Friedler, Y., Warwick, P. & Chaplain, R. (1995). Developing an understanding of the meaning of line graphs in primary science investigations, using portable computers and data logging software. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 14(4), 416–480.Google Scholar
  22. McIntyre, C. (2000). The art of action research in the classroom. David Fulton, London.Google Scholar
  23. MCEETYA (1999). The Adelaide declaration on the national goals for schooling in the twenty-first century. Cited 11 August 2005.
  24. Newton, L. & Rogers, L. (2003). Thinking frameworks for planning ICT in science lessons. School Science Review, 83(309), 113–120.Google Scholar
  25. NSW Department of Education and Training (2002). Curriculum support for teaching in science 7–12. NSW Department of Education and Training, Sydney.Google Scholar
  26. Ofsted (2002). ICT in schools: Effect of government initiatives – students' achievements. Office for Standards in Education, London.Google Scholar
  27. Oldham, V. (2003). Effective use of ICT in secondary science: Guidelines and case studies. School Science Review, 83(309), 53–61.Google Scholar
  28. Parker, L. (2000). Learning technologies and their impact on science education: Delivering the promise. Australian Science Teachers Journal 46(3), 9–20.Google Scholar
  29. Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
  30. Pickersgill, D. (2003). Effective use of the Internet in science teaching. School Science Review, 83(309), 77–87.Google Scholar
  31. Pitman, M.A. & Maxwell, M.J.A. (1992). Qualitative approaches to evaluation: Models and methods. In M.D. LeCompte, W.L. Millroy & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  32. Rogers, L. & Finlayson, H. (2003). Does ICT in science really work in the classroom? Part 1, the individual teacher experience. School Science Review, 83(309), 105–113.Google Scholar
  33. Tosteson, J.L. (1997). The scientific world view, information technology, and science education: Closing the gap between knowledge-generation and knowledge-consumption. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 6(4), 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. TTA (2002). Using ICT to meet teaching objectives in science. TPU0306, Teacher Training Agency, UK.Google Scholar
  35. Watson, D. (1998). Blame the technocentric artefact! What research tells us about problems inhibiting teacher use of IT. In G. Marshall & M. Ruohonen (Eds.), Capacity building in education in developing countries (pp. 185–192). Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  36. White, R.T. (1998). Research, theories of learning, principles of teaching and classroom practice: Examples and issues. Studies in Science Education, 31, 55–70.Google Scholar
  37. Willis, J. (1998). Data-logging isn't that difficult – and it can be fun. Primary Science Review, 51, 10–12.Google Scholar
  38. Windschitl, M. & Andre, T. (1998). Using computer simulations to enhance conceptual change: The roles of constructivist instruction and student epistemological beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia
  2. 2.ANU Medical SchoolAustralian National UniversityACTAustralia

Personalised recommendations