Probing High School Physics Students' Views and Concerns about Learning Activities

  • Dorothy Langley
  • Bat-Sheva Eylon


The current study is framed within an ongoing effort of probing students' attitudes and expectations about knowing and learning physics, which has driven several investigations during the past decade. The questionnaire we developed focuses on physics students' views regarding a variety of specific learning activities, which are presented by title or short description, as detailed tasks and as components of learner strategies. Our study involved 223 physics majors from 10 high schools. The results show that teacher lectures and demonstrations are seen as major contributors to developing students' physics knowledge. Students also consider traditional student initiatives (e.g., reading the textbook and solving problems) and inquiry activities, including Information Technology Based Activities (ITBA), as contributing (in varying degrees) to the development of their physics knowledge. We found that students' willingness to engage in a task was correlated with the value they attributed to it for the development of their physics knowledge. Students' views regarding different learning strategies reveal the tension they experience between the need to succeed on traditional exams versus the need for a gradual construction of a sound knowledge structure and achievement of deeper understanding. We have employed our questionnaire as a tool for assessing students' receptiveness to an instructional intervention that dealt with integrating ITBA into physics instruction and used our research findings for guiding the implementation design.


information technology based inquiry activities learning activities learner strategies research instruments student views 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atkinson, R.K., Derry, S.J., Renkl, A. & Wortham, D. (2000). Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70, 181–214. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1989). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 361–392). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
  3. Chi, M.T.H. & Bassok, M. (1989). Learning from examples via self-explanations. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 251–282). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
  4. Elby, A. (1999). Another reason that physics students learn by rote. Physics Education Research, American Journal of Physics Supplement, 67(7), S52–S57. Google Scholar
  5. Elby, A. (2001). Helping physics students learn about learning. Physics Education Research, American Journal of Physics Supplement, 69(7), S52–S57. Google Scholar
  6. Eylon, B. & Helfman, J. (1984). Analogical problem solving processes in physics. In A.M. Mayer & P. Tamir (Eds.), Science teaching in Israel – origins, development and achievements (pp. 259–271). Jerusalem: Israel Science Teaching Center. Google Scholar
  7. Halloun, I. (1997). Views about science and physics achievement: The VASS story. In E.F. Redish & J.S. Rigden (Eds.), The changing role of physics departments in modern universities. Proceedings of ICUPE College Park, MD: American Institute of Physics Press. Google Scholar
  8. Hammer, D. (1994). Epistemological beliefs in introductory physics. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 151–183. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hammer, D. (1995). Epistemological considerations in teaching introductory physics. Science Education, 79(4), 393–413. Google Scholar
  10. Hammer, D. & Elby, A. (2003). Tapping epistemological resources for learning physics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 53–90. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Langley, D.V. (2001). Integrating inquiry activities into physics instruction in a computer-based information technology environment. Unpublished doctoral thesis presented to the Feinberg Graduate School of the Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. Google Scholar
  12. Pope, M. & Gilbert, J. (1983). Personal experience and the construction of knowledge in science. Science Education, 67, 193–203. Google Scholar
  13. Redish, E.F., Steinberg, R.N. & Saul, J.M. (1998). Student expectations in introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 66, 212–224. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Reif, F. & Larkin, J.H. (1991). Cognition and everyday domains: comparison and learning implications. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 773–760. Google Scholar
  15. Roth, W.-M. & Roychoudhury, A. (1994). Physics students' epistemologies and views about knowing and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), 5–30. Google Scholar
  16. Schommer, M. (1990). The effect of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498–504. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schoenfeld, A.H. (1983). Beyond the purely cognitive: Belief systems, social cognitions and metacognitions as driving forces in intellectual performance. Cognitive Science, 7(4), 329–363. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Songer, N.B. & Linn, M.C. (1991). How do students' views of science influence knowledge integration? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 761–784. Google Scholar
  19. Tobin, K., Tippins, D.J. & Hook, K.S. (1995). Students' beliefs about epistemology, science and classroom learning: A question of fit. In S.M. Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.), Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice (pp. 85–108). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar
  20. White, B.Y., Elby, A., Fredriksen, J.R. & Schwarz, C. (1999). The epistemological beliefs assessment for physical students. (Unpublished). Presented at the 1999 AERA session “Assessing and changing students' epistemological beliefs about science and learning,” Montreal.
  21. Yerushalmi, I. (2001). Promoting self-monitoring in physics problem-solving: A professional development through a “cooperative teachers' inquiry” workshop. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Feinberg graduate school, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. Google Scholar
  22. Zohar, A. & Sela, D. (2002). Her physics, his physics: gender issues in Israeli advanced placement physics classes. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 245–268. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zoller, U. (1999). Scaling up of higher-order cognitive skills-oriented college chemistry teaching: An action-oriented research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(5), 583–596. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dorothy Langley
    • 1
  • Bat-Sheva Eylon
    • 1
  1. 1.Science TeachingWeizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael

Personalised recommendations