Advertisement

Student understanding and application of science concepts in the context of an integrated curriculum setting

  • Grady Venville
  • Léonie Rennie
  • John Wallace
Article

Abstract

The integration of science with other disciplines is a popular curriculum reform strategy. However, there is an absence of empirical research into how students understand and apply science concepts in integrated curricula settings. This case study focuses on three pairs of Year 9 students and their understanding and application of the concepts of electrical circuit and current in the construction of a solar-powered boat. Our results revealed some limited evidence of students applying formal science knowledge to complete their projects and bridge the discipline boundaries. However, students did not always hold and use the accepted scientific view of electrical current as they undertook their projects. We conclude that integrated approaches to teaching science may be appropriate to engage students in using scientific knowledge as a tool to solve real-world problems, but raise some questions as to whether they improve conceptual understanding.

Keywords

Teaching Science Electrical Current Empirical Research Science Knowledge Education Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bean, J.A. 1991The middle school: The natural home of integrated curriculumEducational Leadership49913Google Scholar
  2. Bean, J.A. 1995Curriculum integration and the disciplines of knowledgePhi Delta Kappan76616622Google Scholar
  3. Brantlinger, E., Majd-Jabbari, M. 1998The conflicted pedagogical and curricular perspectives of middle class mothersJournal of Curriculum Studies30431460Google Scholar
  4. Carr, M. 1996Interviews about instances and interviews about eventsTreagust, D.F.Duit, R.Fraser, B. eds. Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematicsTeachers College PressNew York, NY4453Google Scholar
  5. Cosgrove, M. 1995A study of science-in-the-making as students generate an analogy for electricityInternational Journal of Science Education17295310Google Scholar
  6. Czerniak, C.M., Weber, W.B., Sandmann, A., Ahern, J. 1999A literature review of science and mathematics integrationSchool Science and Mathematics99421430Google Scholar
  7. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., Scott, P. 1994Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroomEducational Researcher23512Google Scholar
  8. Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., Wood-Robinson, V. 1994Making sense of secondary science: Research into children’s ideasRoutledgeLondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Erickson, F. 1986Qualitative methods in research on teachingWittrock, M.C. eds. Handbook of research on teaching3rd ed.MacmillanNew York119161Google Scholar
  10. Fensham, P.Gunstone, R.White, R. eds. 1994The content of scienceThe Falmer PressLondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Fontana, A., Frey, J.H. 1994Interviewing: The art of scienceDenzin, N.K.Lincoln, Y.S. eds. Handbook of qualitative researchSageThousand Oaks, CA361376Google Scholar
  12. Goodson, I. 1992Studying school subjectsCurriculum Perspectives122326Google Scholar
  13. Guba, E.G., Lincoln, Y.S. 1989Fourth generation evaluationSageNewbury Park, CAGoogle Scholar
  14. Hand, B.Prain, V. eds. 1995The constructivist classroom: Teaching and learning in scienceHarcourt-BraceLondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., Moore, S., Manning, S. 2001Learning to change: Beyond subjects and standardsJossey-BassSan Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  16. Hatch, T. 1998The differences in theory that matter in the practice of school improvementAmerican Educational Research Journal35331Google Scholar
  17. Hertzog, N.B. 1997The creation of a school and curriculum reformJournal of Curriculum Studies29209231Google Scholar
  18. Janesick, V.J. 2000The choreography of qualitative research design: Minuets, improvisations, and crystallizationDenzin, N.K.Lincoln, Y.S. eds. Handbook of qualitative research2nd ed.SageThousand Oaks, CA379399Google Scholar
  19. Kain, D.L. 1996Recipes of dialogue? A middle school team conceptualizes ‘curriculum integration.’Journal of Curriculum and Supervision11163185Google Scholar
  20. Lincoln, Y.S., Guba, E.G. 2000Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluencesDenzin, N.K.Lincoln, Y.S. eds. Handbook of qualitative research2nd ed.SageThousand Oaks, CA163188Google Scholar
  21. Merriam, S.B. 1998Qualitative research and case study applications in education2nd ed.Jossey-BassSan Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller, K., Metheny, D., Davison, D. 1997Issues in integrating mathematics and scienceScience Educator61621Google Scholar
  23. National Council of Teachers ofMathematics (NCTM)1989Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematicsAuthorReston, VAGoogle Scholar
  24. National Research Council1989Everybody counts. A report to the nation on the future of mathematics educationNational Academy PressWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  25. Nixon, J. 1991Reclaiming coherence: Cross-curriculum provision and the national curriculumJournal of Curriculum Studies23187192Google Scholar
  26. Osborne, R., Freyberg, P. 1985Learning in science: The implications of children’s scienceHeinemannAucklandGoogle Scholar
  27. Patton, M.Q. 1990Qualitative evaluation and research methods2nd ed.SageNewbury Park, CAGoogle Scholar
  28. Queensland School Curriculum Council2002Cross-curricular priorities - literacy, numeracy, lifeskills, futures perspectiveAuthorBrisbane, Australia(now Queensland Studies Authority)Google Scholar
  29. Rogers, B. 1997Informing the shape of the curriculum: New views of knowledge and its representation in schoolingJournal of Curriculum Studies29683710Google Scholar
  30. Roth, W.-M. 1998Designing communitiesKluwerDordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  31. Rutherford, F.J., Ahlgren, A. 1990Science for all AmericansOxford University PressNew York, NYGoogle Scholar
  32. Schools Council, National Board of Employment, Education and Training1993The compulsory years in the middle: Schooling for young adolescentsAustralian Government Publishing ServiceCanberraGoogle Scholar
  33. Shipstone, D. 1985Electricity in simple circuitsDriver, R.Guesne, E.Tiberghien, A. eds. Children’s ideas in scienceOpen University PressMilton Keynes, UK3351Google Scholar
  34. Speering, W., Rennie, L. 1996Students’ perceptions about science: The impact of transition from primary to secondary schoolResearch in Science Education26283298Google Scholar
  35. Venville, G., Wallace, J., Rennie, L., Malone, J. 1998The integration of science, mathematics and technology in a discipline-based cultureSchool Science and Mathematics98294302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Venville, G., Wallace, J., Rennie, L., Malone, J. 1999Building bridges across the disciplines: Learning science through technologyThe Journal of Design and Technology Education44045Google Scholar
  37. Venville, G., Wallace, J., Rennie, L., Malone, J. 2000Bridging the boundaries of compartmentalised knowledge: Student learning in an integrated environmentResearch in Science and Technological Education182335Google Scholar
  38. Venville, G., Rennie, L. & Wallace, J. (in press). Decision making and sources of knowledge: How students tackle integrated tasks in science, technology and mathematics. Research in Science Education.Google Scholar
  39. Villas, B.A. 1993Marketing the middle level team concept to high school-minded teachersSchools in the Middle31618Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Grady Venville
    • 1
  • Léonie Rennie
    • 1
  • John Wallace
    • 1
  1. 1.Science and Mathematics Education CentreCurtin University of TechnologyPerthWestern Australia

Personalised recommendations