This study is intended to develop an assessment instrument to investigate students’ understandings about internal transport in plants and human circulatory system. A refined process of a two-tier diagnostic test was used to develop the instrument. Finally, three versions of the Internal Transport in Plants and the Human Circulatory System test were developed for different educational levels: elementary, secondary and high school level. The test–retest reliability, the degree of difficulty, and the range of discrimination were found to be reasonable for all three versions. The statistical variances across educational levels of the verification samples and the test applications are discussed. The students’ major alternative conceptions on internal transport of plants and human were classified into three attributes of explanations: interconnectedness, language and anthropomorphism. Based on the nature of students’ explanations, card-sorting with justification, learning cycle and concept mapping were recommended for in-depth learning of the concept.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Adams, A.D. & Griffard, P.B. (2001). Analysis of alternative conceptions in physics and biology: Similarities, differences, and implications for conceptual change. Paper presented at the 2001 NARST Annual Meeting Conference, St. Louis, 25–28 March.
Anastasi, A. (1982). Psychological testing, 5th edn. NY: Macmillan Publishing Co.
Arnaudin, M.W. & Mintzes, J.J. (1985). Students’ alternative conceptions of the human circulatory system: A cross-age study. Science Education, 69, 721–733.
Ausubel, D.P. (1968). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. NY: Grune and Stratton.
Barker, M. & Carr, M. (1989). Teaching and learning about photo synthesis. Part 1: An assessment in terms of students’ prior knowledge. European Journal of Science Education, 11(1), 49–56.
Brainsford, J.D., Brown, A.L. & Cocking, R.R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.
Chiou, Y. & Gene, J. (1994). The alternative frameworks of circulatory system concepts in eighth grade students. Science Education, 5, 53–57. (In Chinese.)
Driver, R. & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61–84.
Driver, A.S., Squires, A., Rushworth, P. & Wood-Robison, V. (2001). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children’s ideas. NY: Routledge Falmer.
Gunstone, R. & Watts, M. (1993). Force and motion. In Driver, Guesne & Tiberghien (Eds.), Children’s ideas in science. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Haslam, F. & Treagust, D.F. (1987). Diagnosing secondary students’ misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier multiple choice instrument. Journal of Biological Education, 21, 203–211.
Hewson, P.W. & Hewson, M.G.A. (1984). The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction. Instructional Science, 13, 1–13.
Lawson, A.E. & Thomposon, L.D. (1988). Formal reasoning ability and biological misconceptions\concerning genetics and natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 733–746.
Lien, A.J. (1971). Measurement and evaluation in learning, 2nd edn. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown Co.
Mintzes, J.J., Wandersee, J.H. & Novak, J.D. (1997). Meaning learning in science: The human constructivist perspective. In Phye (Ed.), Handbook of academic learning: Construction of knowledge (pp. 405–477). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Novak, J. & Gowin, D.B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Odom, A.L. & Barrow, L.H. (1995). Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students’ understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 54–61.
Simpson, W.D. & Marek, E.A. (1988). Understandings and misconceptions of biology concepts held by students attending small high schools and students attending large high schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 361–374.
Tamir, P. (1989). Some issues related to the use of justifications to multiple-choice answers. Journal of Biological Education, 23(4), 285–292.
Treagust, D.F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 159–169.
Wandersee, J.H. (1983). Students’ misconceptions about photosynthesis: A cross-age study. In Helm & Novak (Eds.), Proceedings of the international seminar on misconceptions in science and mathematics (pp. 441–466). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Wandersee, J.H. (2000). Language, analogy, and biology. In Fisher, Wandersee & Moody (Eds.), Mapping biology knowledge. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Westbrook, S.L. & Marek, E.A. (1991). A cross-age study of student understanding of the concept of diffusion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(8), 649–660.
White, R.W. & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing understanding. London: Falmer Press.
Yip, D. (1998). Identification of misconceptions in novice biology teachers and remedial strategies for improving biology learning. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 461–477.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, JR. Development and Validation of a Two-Tier Instrument to Examine Understanding of Internal Transport in Plants and the Human Circulatory System. Int J Sci Math Educ 2, 131–157 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-9323-2
- alternative conceptions
- human circulatory system
- internal transport in plants