Understanding and Conceptual Change in Science and Mathematics: An International Agenda within a Constructivist Framework

  • Joel J. Mintzes
  • Mei-Hung Chiu
Open Access


  1. Ausubel, D., Novak, J. & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Google Scholar
  2. Chi, M.T.H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 129–186). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Google Scholar
  3. Chi, M.T.H. & Roscoe, R.D. (2002). The processes and challenges of conceptual change. In Limon & Mason (Eds.), Reframing the process of conceptual change: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 3–27). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar
  4. Driver, R. & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61–84. Google Scholar
  5. Mintzes, J., Wandersee, J. & Novak, J. (1998). Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Google Scholar
  6. Mintzes, J., Wandersee, J. & Novak, J. (2000). Assessing science understanding: A human constructivist view. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Google Scholar
  7. Wandersee, J., Mintzes, J. & Novak, J. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177–210). New York: MacMillan. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joel J. Mintzes
    • 1
  • Mei-Hung Chiu
    • 2
  1. 1.Fulbright-Technion FellowDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina at WilmingtonHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Graduate Institute of Science EducationNational Taiwan Normal UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations