Abstract
The study investigated elementary school pupils' ideas concerning the concept of electricity and the effect of school instruction on the pupil's views. Pupils of different cultural backgrounds were assessed to ascertain their knowledge in four areas: Relation of certain natural phenomena to electricity; Mental models (images) of direct current in a circuit; Images possessed regarding electricity and electric current. Pupils' ideas were investigated before and after instruction, thus providing information about the effect of instruction on the views of pupils. In construct to the previous findings, certain phenomena (lightning and thunder among them) were related by the pupils to electricity even before those were taught. Evidently, the instruction changed the mental models and images of electricity and electric current.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker, D. & Taylor, P.C.S. (1995). The effect of culture on the learning of science in non-western cultures: The results of integrated research review. International Journal of Science Education, 17(6), 695–704.
Bar, V. (1989). Children's ideas about the water cycle. Science Education, 73(4), 481–500.
Bensegire, A. & Closset, J.L. (1996). The electrostatic electro kinetic transition: Instructional and educational difficulties. International Journal of Science Education, 18(20), 179–191.
Borges, T.A. & Gilbert, J.K. (1999). Mental models of electricity. International Journal of Science Education, 21(1), 95–117.
Caillot, M. (2002). Student relationship to knowledge and science. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Science Education, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Driver, R., Tiberghien, A. & Guesne, E. (1985). Children's ideas in science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Eylon, B. & Ganiel, U. (1985). Macro–micro relationship, the missing link between electrostatic and electrodynamics in students' reasoning. International Journal of Science Education, 7(1), 12–22.
Galili, I., Goldberg, F. & Bendall, S. (1993). Effects of prior knowledge and instruction on understanding image formation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(3), 271–303.
Galili, I. & Bar, V. (1992). Motion implies force. Where to expect vestiges of the misconception? International Journal of Science Education, 14(1), 63–81.
Galili, I. & Hazan, A. (2000a). Learner's knowledge in optics: Interpretation structure and analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 57–88.
Galili, I. & Hazan, A. (2000b). The influence of a historically oriented course on students' content knowledge in optics evaluated by means of facets – schemes analysis. American Journal of Physics, 68(7), S3-15.
Gliozzi, M. (1965). Storia della fisica. Torino, Italy: Storia della Scienze.
Levinger, M. & Dresler, T. (1993). With the current. Instruction unit in electricity for elementary school. Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel: Ramot Press.
Marei, S. (1974). School and society in the Arabic rural area in Israel. Studies in Education, 4, 85–104.
Novak, J. (1977). Epicycles and the homocentric earth: Or what is wrong with the stages of cognitive development? Science Education, 61(3), 393–395.
Oldham, V., Black, P., Solomon, J. & Stuart, H. (1986). A study of pupils' views on the dangers of electricity. European Journal of Science Education, 8(2), 185–197.
Osborne, R.J. (1981). Children's ideas about electric current. New Zealand Science Teacher, 29, 12–19.
Piaget, J. (1929). La representation du monda chez l'enfant. Paris: Presses Universities de France.
Piaget, J. (1951). The child conception of physical causality. Totowa: Littlefield and Adams.
Saphady, R. (2000). Alternative conceptions of 13 years old Arabic pupils about electricity. Opening Gates for Teachers Instruction, 1, 1–19.
Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 243–260.
Shepardson, D.P. & Moje, B.E. (1999). The role of anomalous data in restructuring fourth graders' frameworks for understanding electric currents. International Journal of Science Education, 21(1), 77–94.
Shipstone, D.M. (1984). A study of children understanding simple DC circuits. European Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 185–198.
Solomon, J., Black, P., Oldham, V. & Stuart, H. (1985). The pupils' view of electricity. European Journal of Science Education, 7(3), 281–294.
Stocklmayer, S.M. & Treagust, D.F. (1996). Images of electricity, how do novice and experts model electric current. International Journal of Science Education, 18(2), 163–178.
Summers, M., Kruger, C. & Mant, J. (1998). Teaching electricity effectively in the primary school: A case study. International Journal of Science Education, 20(2), 153–171.
Taylor, L.W. (1941). Physics. The pioneer science. New York: Dover.
Tiberghien, A. & Delacote, G. (1976). Manipulation of the presentation of electric circuits among young children, aged 7–12 years. Revue Françoise de Pedagogy, 34, 32–44.
Tobin, K. (1993). Constructivism: The practice of constructivism in science education. Washington, DC: AAAS.
Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 45–69.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Azaiza, I., Bar, V. & Galili, I. Learning Electricity in Elementary School. Int J Sci Math Educ 4, 45–71 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-6826-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-6826-9