Advertisement

Learning Electricity in Elementary School

  • Ibtisam Azaiza
  • Varda Bar
  • Igal GaliliEmail author
Article

Abstract

The study investigated elementary school pupils' ideas concerning the concept of electricity and the effect of school instruction on the pupil's views. Pupils of different cultural backgrounds were assessed to ascertain their knowledge in four areas: Relation of certain natural phenomena to electricity; Mental models (images) of direct current in a circuit; Images possessed regarding electricity and electric current. Pupils' ideas were investigated before and after instruction, thus providing information about the effect of instruction on the views of pupils. In construct to the previous findings, certain phenomena (lightning and thunder among them) were related by the pupils to electricity even before those were taught. Evidently, the instruction changed the mental models and images of electricity and electric current.

Keywords

introductory instruction mental models direct current scheme-of-knowledge cultural background 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, D. & Taylor, P.C.S. (1995). The effect of culture on the learning of science in non-western cultures: The results of integrated research review. International Journal of Science Education, 17(6), 695–704. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bar, V. (1989). Children's ideas about the water cycle. Science Education, 73(4), 481–500. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bensegire, A. & Closset, J.L. (1996). The electrostatic electro kinetic transition: Instructional and educational difficulties. International Journal of Science Education, 18(20), 179–191. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borges, T.A. & Gilbert, J.K. (1999). Mental models of electricity. International Journal of Science Education, 21(1), 95–117. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caillot, M. (2002). Student relationship to knowledge and science. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Science Education, Nicosia, Cyprus. Google Scholar
  6. Driver, R., Tiberghien, A. & Guesne, E. (1985). Children's ideas in science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press. Google Scholar
  7. Eylon, B. & Ganiel, U. (1985). Macro–micro relationship, the missing link between electrostatic and electrodynamics in students' reasoning. International Journal of Science Education, 7(1), 12–22. Google Scholar
  8. Galili, I., Goldberg, F. & Bendall, S. (1993). Effects of prior knowledge and instruction on understanding image formation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(3), 271–303. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Galili, I. & Bar, V. (1992). Motion implies force. Where to expect vestiges of the misconception? International Journal of Science Education, 14(1), 63–81. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Galili, I. & Hazan, A. (2000a). Learner's knowledge in optics: Interpretation structure and analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 57–88. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Galili, I. & Hazan, A. (2000b). The influence of a historically oriented course on students' content knowledge in optics evaluated by means of facets – schemes analysis. American Journal of Physics, 68(7), S3-15. Google Scholar
  12. Gliozzi, M. (1965). Storia della fisica. Torino, Italy: Storia della Scienze. Google Scholar
  13. Levinger, M. & Dresler, T. (1993). With the current. Instruction unit in electricity for elementary school. Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel: Ramot Press. Google Scholar
  14. Marei, S. (1974). School and society in the Arabic rural area in Israel. Studies in Education, 4, 85–104. Google Scholar
  15. Novak, J. (1977). Epicycles and the homocentric earth: Or what is wrong with the stages of cognitive development? Science Education, 61(3), 393–395. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Oldham, V., Black, P., Solomon, J. & Stuart, H. (1986). A study of pupils' views on the dangers of electricity. European Journal of Science Education, 8(2), 185–197. Google Scholar
  17. Osborne, R.J. (1981). Children's ideas about electric current. New Zealand Science Teacher, 29, 12–19. Google Scholar
  18. Piaget, J. (1929). La representation du monda chez l'enfant. Paris: Presses Universities de France. Google Scholar
  19. Piaget, J. (1951). The child conception of physical causality. Totowa: Littlefield and Adams. Google Scholar
  20. Saphady, R. (2000). Alternative conceptions of 13 years old Arabic pupils about electricity. Opening Gates for Teachers Instruction, 1, 1–19. Google Scholar
  21. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 243–260. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shepardson, D.P. & Moje, B.E. (1999). The role of anomalous data in restructuring fourth graders' frameworks for understanding electric currents. International Journal of Science Education, 21(1), 77–94. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shipstone, D.M. (1984). A study of children understanding simple DC circuits. European Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 185–198. Google Scholar
  24. Solomon, J., Black, P., Oldham, V. & Stuart, H. (1985). The pupils' view of electricity. European Journal of Science Education, 7(3), 281–294. Google Scholar
  25. Stocklmayer, S.M. & Treagust, D.F. (1996). Images of electricity, how do novice and experts model electric current. International Journal of Science Education, 18(2), 163–178. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Summers, M., Kruger, C. & Mant, J. (1998). Teaching electricity effectively in the primary school: A case study. International Journal of Science Education, 20(2), 153–171. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Taylor, L.W. (1941). Physics. The pioneer science. New York: Dover. Google Scholar
  28. Tiberghien, A. & Delacote, G. (1976). Manipulation of the presentation of electric circuits among young children, aged 7–12 years. Revue Françoise de Pedagogy, 34, 32–44. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tobin, K. (1993). Constructivism: The practice of constructivism in science education. Washington, DC: AAAS. Google Scholar
  30. Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 45–69. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Science Teaching Department, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural SciencesThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations