Advertisement

Cognitive Variables in Problem Solving: A Nonlinear Approach

  • Dimitrios StamovlasisEmail author
  • Georgios Tsaparlis
Open Access
Article

Abstract

We employ tools of complexity theory to examine the effect of cognitive variables, such as working-memory capacity, degree of field dependence–independence, developmental level and the mobility–fixity dimension. The nonlinear method correlates the subjects’ rank-order achievement scores with each cognitive variable. From the achievement scores in organic-synthesis problems of various mental demands, rank-order sequences of the subjects, according to their scores, were generated, and in the place of each subject, his/her score was replaced by the value of the corresponding cognitive variable. Then each sequence was mapped onto a one-dimensional random walk, and when treated as a dynamic flow, was found to possess fractal geometry, with characteristics depending on the complexity of the problem. The findings were interpreted using concepts from complexity theory, such as order, correlation exponents, and entropy. The method provides meaningful results and adds to the understanding of information processing and the role of cognitive variables within the frame of predictive models in problem solving. Although the method is applied to a particular kind of problems (chemical, organic-synthesis problems), it can be generalized to other problems, not only in chemistry, but also in other sciences and in mathematics. Finally, the educational implications are discussed.

Keywords

cognitive variables complexity theory degree of field dependence–independence developmental level mobility–fixity dimension nonlinear methods problem solving working-memory capacity 

References

  1. Adey, P. & Shayer, M. (1994). Really raising standards: Cognitive intervention and academic achievement. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
  2. Addison, P.S. (1997). Fractals and chaos. Bristol and Philadelphia: Institute of Physics Publishing. Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson, R.C. & Shiffrin, R.M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K.W. Spence (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, Vol. 2 (pp. 89–195). New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
  4. Baddeley, A.D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  5. Baddeley, A.D. (1990). Human memory: Theory and practice. London: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
  6. Bunde, A. & Halvin, S. (1994). Fractals in science. Springer. Google Scholar
  7. Cramer, F. (1993). Chaos and order. The complex structure of living systems. Wienheim: VCH. Google Scholar
  8. El-Banna, H.A.A.M. (1987). The development of a predictive theory of science education based upon information processing hypothesis. Doctoral thesis, Glasgow, UK, University of Glasgow. Google Scholar
  9. Gabel, D.L. & Bunce, D.M. (1994). Research on problem solving in chemistry. In D.L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research in science teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan. Google Scholar
  10. Hurst, H. (1951). Long term storage capacity of reservoirs. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 116, 770–799. Google Scholar
  11. Johnstone, A.H. & El-Banna, H. (1986). Capacities, demands and processes – a predictive model for science education. Education in Chemistry, 23, 80–84. Google Scholar
  12. Johnstone, A.H. & El-Banna, H. (1989). Understanding learning difficulties – a predictive research model. Studies in Higher Education, 14, 159–168. Google Scholar
  13. Johnstone, A.H., Hogg, W.R. & Ziane, M. (1993). A working memory model applied to physics problem solving. International Journal of Science Education, 15, 663–672. Google Scholar
  14. Johnstone, A.H. & Kellet, N.C. (1980). Learning difficulties in school science – towards a working hypothesis. European Journal of Science Education, 2, 175–181. Google Scholar
  15. Johnstone, A.H. & Selepeg, D. (2000). A language problem revisited. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 2, 19–20 [http://www.uoi.gr/cerp]. Google Scholar
  16. Lawson, A.E. (1978). Development and validation of the classroom test of formal reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15, 11–24. Google Scholar
  17. Lawson, A.E. (1985). A review of research on formal reasoning and science instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22, 569–617. Google Scholar
  18. Lawson, A.E. (1993). Classroom test of scientific reasoning: Revised paper–pencil edition. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University. Google Scholar
  19. Lee, K.L. (1985). Cognitive varibles in problem solving. Research in Science Education, 15, 43–50. Google Scholar
  20. Lee, K.L., Goh, N., Chia, L. & Chin, C. (1996). Cognitive variables in problem solving in chemistry: A revisited study. Science Education, 6, 692–710. Google Scholar
  21. Kelso, S.J.A. (1999). Dynamic patterns. Cambridge: The MIT Press. Google Scholar
  22. Kiel, L.D. & Elliott, E. (1996). Chaos theory in social sciences: Foundations and applications. Michigan. Google Scholar
  23. Kirschner, P.A. (2002). Cognitive load theory: Implications of cognitive theory on the design of learning. Learning and Instruction, 12, 1–10. Google Scholar
  24. Mandelbrot, B. (1982). The fractal geometry of nature. New York: W.H. Freeman. Google Scholar
  25. Niaz, M. (1988). The information-processing demand of chemistry problems and its relation to Pascual-Leone’s functional M-capacity. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 231–238. Google Scholar
  26. Niaz, M. (1989a). Dimensional analysis: A neo-Piagetian evaluation of M-demand of chemistry problems. Research in Science and Technology Education, 7, 153–170. Google Scholar
  27. Niaz, M. (1989b). A neo Piagetian interpretation of the mobility–fixity dimension. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68, 1315–1319. Google Scholar
  28. Niaz, M. (1991). Performance based on instruction by lecture or by interaction and its relation to cognitive variables. International Journal of Science Education, 13, 203–215. Google Scholar
  29. Niaz, M. (1994). Pascual-Leone’s theory of constructive operators as an explanatory construct in cognitive development and science achievement. Educational Psychology, 14, 23–43. Google Scholar
  30. Niaz, M. & Logie, R.H. (1993). Working memory, mental capacity and science education: Towards an understanding of the ‘working memory overload hypothesis.’ Oxford Review of Education, 19, 511–525. Google Scholar
  31. Niaz, M. & Saud De Nunez, G. (1991). The relationship of mobility–fixity to creativity, formal reasoning and intelligence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 25, 205–217. Google Scholar
  32. Niaz, M., Saud De Nunez, G. & Ruiz De Pineda, I. (2000). Academic performance of high school students as a function of mental capacity, cognitive style, mobility–fixity dimension, and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34, 18–29. Google Scholar
  33. Pascual-Leone, J. (1970). A mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget’s developmental stages. Acta Psychologica, 32, 301–345. Google Scholar
  34. Pascual-Leone, J. (1974). A neo-Piagetian process-structural model of Witkin’s psychological differentiation. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology, Kingston, Ontario. Google Scholar
  35. Pascual-Leone, J. (1989). An organismic process model of Witkin’s field dependence–independence. In T. Globerson & T. Zelniker (Eds.), Cognitive style and cognitive development (pp. 36–70). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Google Scholar
  36. Pascual-Leone, J. & Burtis, P.J. (1974). FIT: Figural intersection test, a group measure of M-space. Unpublished manuscript, Ontario, York University. Google Scholar
  37. Peitgen, H.O., Jurgens, H. & Saupe, D. (1992). Chaos and fractals. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar
  38. Peng, C.K., Buldyrev, S.V., Goldberger, A.L., Halvin, S., Simons, M. & Stanley, H.E. (1993). Finite-size effects on long-range correlation: Implication for analyzing DNA sequences. Physical Review E, 47, 3730. Google Scholar
  39. Port, R.F. & Van Gelder, T. (1995). Mind as motion. Cambridge: The MIT Press. Google Scholar
  40. Scandarmalia, M. (1977). Information processing capacity and the problem of horizontal decalage: A demonstration using combinatorial reasoning task. Child Psychology, 48, 301–345. Google Scholar
  41. Simon, A.H. (1974). How big is a chunk? Science, 183, 482–488. Google Scholar
  42. Sprott, J.C. & Rowlands, G. (1995). Chaos data analyzer. Physical Academy Software. Google Scholar
  43. Stamovlasis, D., Kousathana, M., Angelopoulos, V., Tsaparlis, G. & Niaz, M. (2002). Achievement in chemistry problem solving as a function of mobility–fixity dimension. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95, 914–924. Google Scholar
  44. Stamovlasis, D. & Tsaparlis, G. (1999). An application of complexity theory to an information model in science education. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference for Chaos Theory in Psychology and Life Sciences, July 23–26, Berkeley University, CA, USA. Google Scholar
  45. Stamovlasis, D. & Tsaparlis, G. (2000). Nonlinear analysis of the effect of working memory capacity on organic-synthesis problem solving. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 1, 375–380 [http://www.uoi.gr/cerp]. Google Scholar
  46. Stamovlasis, D. & Tsaparlis, G. (2001a). Application of complexity theory to an information-processing model in science education. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology and Life Sciences, 5, 267–286. Google Scholar
  47. Stamovlasis, D. & Tsaparlis, G. (2001b). Nonlinear analysis of the effect of working memory capacity on students performance in problem solving: The case of chemical equilibrium problem solving. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA), August 21–27, 2001, Thessaloniki, Greece. Google Scholar
  48. Stamovlasis, D. & Tsaparlis, G. (2003a). A complexity theory model in science education problem solving: Random walks for working memory and mental capacity. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology and Life Science, 7, 221–244. Google Scholar
  49. Stamovlasis, D. & Tsaparlis, G. (2003b). Nonlinear analysis of the effect of working memory capacity on student performance in problem solving. In Psillos, D. et al. (Eds.), Science education research in the knowledge based society (pp. 183–190). Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar
  50. Tsaparlis, G. (1998). Dimensional analysis and predictive models in problem solving. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 335–350. Google Scholar
  51. Tsaparlis, G. & Angelopoulos, V. (2000). A model of problem solving: Its operation, validity, and usefulness in the case of organic-synthesis problems. Science Education, 84, 131–153. Google Scholar
  52. Tsaparlis, G., Kousathana, M. & Niaz, M. (1998). Molecular-equilibrium problems: Manipulation of logical structure and of M-demand, and their effect on student performance. Science Education, 82, 437–454. Google Scholar
  53. Tsaparlis, G. & Stamovlasis, D. (1999). A working-memory random walk for analyzing problem-solving data: The case of organic-synthesis problems. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA). Kiel, Germany (pp. 226–228). Google Scholar
  54. Tsaparlis, G. & Zoller, U. (2003). Evaluation of higher- vs. lower-order cognitive skills-type examinations in chemistry: Implications for university in-class assessment and examinations. University Chemistry Education, 7, 50–57 [http://www.rsc.org.uchemed]. Google Scholar
  55. Wechsler, D. (1955). Wechsler adult intelligence scale manual. New York: Psychological Corporation. Google Scholar
  56. Werner, H. (1957). The concept of development from a comparative and organismic point of view. In D.B. Harris (Ed.), The concept of development: An issue in the study of human behavior (pp. 125–148). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Google Scholar
  57. Williams, P. (1997). Chaos theory tamed. London: Taylor & Francis. Google Scholar
  58. Witkin, H.A. (1965). Psychological differentiation and forms of pathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 70, 317–336. Google Scholar
  59. Witkin, H.A. (1978). Cognitive styles in personal and cultural adaptation. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press. Google Scholar
  60. Witkin, H.A. & Goodenough, D.R. (1981). Cognitive styles: Essence and origins. New York: International University Press. Google Scholar
  61. Witkin, H.A., Dyk, R.B., Paterson, H.F., Goodenough, D.R. & Karp, S.A. (1974). Psychological differentiation. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
  62. Witkin, H.A., Oltman, P.K., Raskin, E. & Karp, S.A. (1971). A manual for the embedded figures test. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press. Google Scholar
  63. Zoller, U. & Tsaparlis, G. (1997). HOCS and LOCS students: The case of chemistry. Research in Science Education, 27, 117–130. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Physical Chemistry Sector, Department of ChemistryUniversity of IoanninaIoanninaGreece

Personalised recommendations