Skip to main content
Log in

The Features and Relationships of Reasoning, Proving and Understanding Proof in Number Patterns

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three issues about students’ reasoning, proving and understanding proof in number patterns are investigated in this paper. The first is to elaborate the features of junior high students’ reasoning on linear and quadratic number patterns. The second is to study the relationships between 9th graders’ justification of mathematical statements about number patterns and their understanding of proof and disproof. The third is to evaluate how reasoning on number patterns is related to constructing proofs. Students in this study were nationally sampled by means of two stages. Some new findings which have not been discovered in some past researches are reported here. These findings include (1) checking geometric number patterns appears to have different positions between the tasks of the linear and the quadratic expressions; (2) proof with the algebraic mode is easy to know but hard to do; (3) disproof with only one counterexample is hard to know but easy to do; (4) arguments with empirical mode or specific symbols were hard for students to validate but very convincing for them; and (5) reasoning on number patterns is supportive for proving in number patterns, and reasoning on number patterns and proof in algebra should be designed as complementary activities for developing algebraic thinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balacheff, N. (1991). Treatment of refutations: Aspects of the complexities of a constructivist approach to mathematics learning. In Glaserfeld (Ed.), Radical constructivism in mathematics education. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bednarz, N., Kieran, C. & Lee, L. (1996). Approaches to algebra. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J. (2000). Linear geometric number patterns: Middle school students’ strategies. Mathematical Education Research Journal, 12(2), 107–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boero, P., Garuti, R. & Mariotti, M.A. (1996). Some dynamic mental processes underlying producing and proving conjectures. PME 20(2), 121–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell (2002). What is number theory? PME 26(1), 208–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chazan, D. (1993). High school geometry students’ justification for their views of empirical evidence and mathematical proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(4), 359–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Corporation for the Australian Educational Council (1990). National statement on mathematics for Australian schools. Victoria: Curriculum Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, P.L. (1981). Aspects of proving: A clinical investigation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gravemeijer, K. & Stephan, M. (2002). Emergent models as an instructional design heuristic. In Gravemeijer, Lehrer, Oers & Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, G. & Jahnke, H.N. (Eds.) (1993). Aspects of proof (special issue). Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(4).

  • Harel, G. & Sowder, L. (1998). Students’ proof schemes: Results from exploratory studies. In A.H. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education 3 (pp. 234–283). Mathematical Association of America.

  • Healy, L. & Hoyles, C. (1998). Justifying and proving in school mathematics. Technical report, London, Institute of Education, University of London.

  • Healy, L. & Hoyles, C. (2000). A study of proof conception in algebra. Journal for Research in Education, 31(4), 396–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuchemann, D. & Hoyles, C. (2001). Investigating factors that influence students’ mathematical reasoning. PME 25(3), 85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor, M. & Stacey, K. (1995). The effect of different approaches to algebra on students’ perceptions of functional relationships. Mathematical Education Research Journal, 7(1), 69–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (1985). Thinking mathematically. Wokingham: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. (1994). Making the transition to formal proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27, 249–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orton, A. (1999). Pattern in the teaching and learning of mathematics. London: Cassell Wellington House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L. (2000). Signs and meaning in students’ emergent algebraic thinking: A semiotic analysis. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42(3), 237–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raman, M. (2003). Key ideas: What are they and how can they help us understand how people view proof? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52, 319–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, M. (1996). Beyond inductive and deductive reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30, 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, K. (1989). Finding and using patterns in linear generalizing problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20, 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taiwan Ministry of Education (2003). A draft plan of nine-year joint mathematics curriculum guidelines (in Chinese). Taiwan Ministry of Education.

  • Thompson, A.G. & Thompson, P.W. (1995). A cognitive perspective on the mathematical preparation of teachers: The case of algebra. In Lacampagne, Blair & Kaput (Eds.), The algebra initiative colloquium, Vol. 1 (pp. 95–116). Washington, DC: US Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaslavsky, O. & Ron, G. (1998). Students’ understanding of the role of counter-examples. PME 22(4), 225–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zazkis, P. & Liljedahl, P. (2002). Generalization of patterns: The tension between algebraic thinking and algebraic notation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 379–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, FL., Yang, KL. & Chen, CY. The Features and Relationships of Reasoning, Proving and Understanding Proof in Number Patterns. Int J Sci Math Educ 2, 227–256 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-3413-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-3413-z

Keywords

Navigation