International Journal of Historical Archaeology

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 555–590 | Cite as

Assemblage Biography and the Life Course: An Archaeologically Materialized Temporality of Richard and Sarah Hopkins

Article

Abstract

A substantial assemblage of material culture deposited ca. 1843–45 in Cambridge, England, is examined from a biographical perspective in terms of what it tells us of the preceding century or so—ca. 1730-1845—rather than the contemporary 1840s. It reveals a materialized temporality, bound up principally with the lives of the college cooks Richard and Sarah Hopkins but also numerous other individuals. The assemblage is also viewed from the perspective of the processes of discard and deposition, and the likely relationship of those involved in this to Richard and Sarah Hopkins.

Keywords

Assemblages Deposition Biography Temporality 

References

  1. Adams, W. H. (2003). Dating historical sites: the importance of understanding time lag in the acquisition, curation, use and disposal of artifacts. Historical Archaeology 37: 38–64.Google Scholar
  2. Archer, M. (1997). The Tin-Glazed Earthenware of the British Isles, Victoria and Albert Museum, London.Google Scholar
  3. Ascher, R. (1961). Analogy in archaeological interpretation. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 17: 317–325.Google Scholar
  4. Bailey, G. (2007). Time perspectives, palimpsests and the archaeology of time. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 26: 198–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barker, D. (2002). Creamware. In Orser Jr., C. E. (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Historical Archaeology, Routledge, London, pp. 137–139.Google Scholar
  6. Beaudry, M. C., and Parno, T. G. (eds.) (2013). Archaeologies of Mobility and Movement, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Bellamy, L. (1998). Commerce, Morality and the Eighteenth-Century Novel, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bimson, M. (1970). The significance of ale-measure marks. Post-Medieval Archaeology 4: 165–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Binford, L. R. (1981). Behavioral archaeology and the “Pompeii Premise”. Journal of Anthropological Research 37: 195–208.Google Scholar
  10. Blackwell, M. (ed.) (2007). The secret life of things: animals, objects, and it-narratives in eighteenth-century England, Bucknell University Press, Lewisburg.Google Scholar
  11. Blackwell, M., Bellamy, L., Upton, C., and Keenleyside, H. (eds.) (2012). British it-narratives, 1750–1830, Pickering and Chatto, London.Google Scholar
  12. Bragdon, K. J. (1988). Occupational differences reflected in material culture. In Beaudry, M. E. (ed.), Documentary Archaeology in the New World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 83–91.Google Scholar
  13. Brooks, A. (2005). An Archaeological Guide to British Ceramics in Australia, 1788–1901, Australasian Society for Historical Archaeology, Sydney.Google Scholar
  14. Carstairs, M. (2013). The Secret Adventures of Crockery: An Archaeological Interpretation of Broken Ceramics and Their Role in “Clearance” Deposits in the Post-Medieval Period, University of Leicester, Leicester, Master’s thesis.Google Scholar
  15. Cessford, C. (2007). Grand Arcade Cambridge: An Archaeological Excavation, Cambridge Archaeological Unit Report 800, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  16. Cessford, C. (2009). Post-1550 urban archaeology in a developer-funded context: an example from Grand Arcade, Cambridge. In Horning, A., and Palmer, M. (eds.), Crossing Paths or Sharing Tracks? Future Directions in the Archaeological Study of Post-1550 Britain and Ireland, Boydell and Brewer, Woodbridge, pp. 301–321.Google Scholar
  17. Cessford, C. (2012a). Life in a “cathedral of consumption”: corporate and personal material culture recovered from a cellar at the Robert Sayle Department Store in Cambridge, England, ca. 1913–21. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 16: 784–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cessford, C. (2012b). The Old Divinity School, Cambridge: An Archaeological Excavation, Cambridge Archaeological Unit Report No. 1094, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  19. Cessford, C. (2014). Mid-19th century dining at Trinity Hall, Cambridge: an assemblage of collegiate dining ceramics. Archaeological Journal 171: 340–380.Google Scholar
  20. Cohen, D. (2006). Household Gods: The British and Their Possessions, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  21. Copeland, R. (1980). Spode’s Willow Pattern, and Other Designs after the Chinese, Studio Vista, London.Google Scholar
  22. Coysh, A. W., and Heywood, R. K. (1984). The Dictionary of Blue and White Printed Pottery 1780–1880, vol. 1, Antique Collectors Club, Woodbridge.Google Scholar
  23. Edwards, A., and Harwood, J. (2013). James Wray’s Carpentry Yard: archaeology of an early Williamsburg industrial craft site. Post-Medieval Archaeology 47: 35–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Finer, A., and Savage, G. (1965). The Selected Letters of Josiah Wedgwood, Cory, Adams, and Mackay, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Flint, C. (1998). Speaking objects: the circulation of stories in eighteenth-century prose fiction. Proceedings of the Modern Language Association 113: 212–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fryer, K., and Shelley, A. (1997). Excavation of a pit at 16 Tunsgate, Guildford, Surrey, 1991. Post-Medieval Archaeology 31: 139–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: towards an interpretive theory of culture. In Geertz, C. (ed.), The Interpretation of Cultures, Basic Books, New York, pp. 3–30.Google Scholar
  28. Gilchrist, R. (2012). Medieval Life: Archaeology and the Life Course, Boydell and Brewer, Woodbridge.Google Scholar
  29. Griffiths, D. M. (1978). Use-marks on historic ceramics: a preliminary study. Historical Archaeology 12: 68–81.Google Scholar
  30. Godden, G. A. (1964). Encyclopaedia of British Pottery and Porcelain Marks, Random House, London.Google Scholar
  31. Goody, J. (1978). The Developmental Cycle in Domestic Groups, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  32. Groover, M. D. (2001). Linking artifact assemblages to household cycles: an example from the Gibbs Site. Historical Archaeology 35: 38–57.Google Scholar
  33. Groover, M. D. (2003). Archaeological Study of Rural Capitalism and Material Life: The Gibbs Farmstead in Southern Appalachia, 1790–1920, Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Haasteren, M. van and Groot, M. (2013). The biography of wells: a functional and ritual life history. Journal of Archaeology in the Low Countries 4: 25–51. http://dpc.uba.uva.nl/jalc/04/nr02/a02.
  35. Hassall, T. G., Halpin, C. E., and Mellor, M. (1985). Excavations in St Ebbe’s, Oxford, 1967–1976: part II, post-medieval domestic tenements and the post-Dissolution site of the Greyfriars. Oxoniensia 49: 153–275.Google Scholar
  36. Herva, V. P., and Nurmi, R. (2009). Beyond consumption: functionality, artifact biography, and early modernity in a European periphery. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 13: 158–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hill, S. H. (1982). An examination of manufacture-deposition lag for glass bottles from late historic sites, in Dickens, R. S. (ed.). Archaeology of Urban America: The Search for Pattern and Progress, Academic Press, New York, pp. 291–327.Google Scholar
  38. Hillier, B. (1965). Master Potters of the Industrial Revolution: The Turners of Lane End, Cory, Adams, and McKay, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Holdaway, S., and Wandsnider, L. (eds.) (2008). Time in Archaeology: Time Perspectivism Revisited, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
  40. Homan, P. (2005). Singleton of Lambeth’s eye ointment. Pharmaceutical Journal 24: 808.Google Scholar
  41. Houghton, R. J., and Priestley, M. R. (2005). Historical Guide to Delftware and Victorian Ointment Pots, Full Circle Creative, London.Google Scholar
  42. Huelsbeck, D. R. (1991). Faunal remains and consumer behavior: what is being measured? Historical Archaeology 25: 62–76.Google Scholar
  43. Johnson, M. (1996). An Archaeology of Capitalism, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  44. Joy, J. (2009). Reinvigorating object biography: reproducing the drama of object lives. World Archaeology 41: 540–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kopytoff, I. (1986). The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process. In Appadurai, A. (ed.), The Social Life of Things, Commodities in Cultural Perspective, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 64–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lewis, J. N. C., and Lewis, G. (2006). Pratt Ware: English and Scottish Relief Decorated and Underglaze Coloured Earthenware, 1780–1840, 2nd ed, Antique Collectors Club, Woodbridge.Google Scholar
  47. Little, B. J. (2007). Historical Archaeology: Why the Past Matters, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek.Google Scholar
  48. Lucas, E. V. (ed.) (1903). The Works of Charles and Mary Lamb, Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  49. Lucas, G. L. (2002). Disposability and dispossession in the twentieth century. Journal of Material Culture 7: 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lucas, G. L. (2005). The Archaeology of Time, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  51. Lucas, G. L. (2006). Historical archaeology and time. In Hicks, D., and Beaudry, M. C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Historical Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–47.Google Scholar
  52. Lucas, G. L. (2012). Understanding the Archaeological Record, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  53. Lucas, G. L. (2013). Conduits of dispersal: dematerializing an early twentieth century village in Iceland. Paper presented at annual meeting of the Society for Historical, Archaeology, Leicester.Google Scholar
  54. Lyman, R. L. (1979). Available meat from faunal remains: a consideration of techniques. American Antiquity 44: 536–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Madsen, A. D., and White, C. L. (2011). Chinese Export Porcelains, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek.Google Scholar
  56. Majewski, T., and O’Brien, M. J. (1987). The use and misuse of nineteenth-century English and American ceramics in archaeological analysis. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 11: 97–208.Google Scholar
  57. Mayne, A., and Murray, T. (2003). (Re) constructing a lost community: “Little Lon”, Melbourne, Australia. Historical Archaeology 37: 87–107.Google Scholar
  58. Miller, G. L. (1980). Classification and economic scaling of 19th-century ceramics. Historical Archaeology 14: 1–40.Google Scholar
  59. Miller, G. L. (1991a). A revised set of CC index values for English ceramics. Historical Archaeology 25: 1–25.Google Scholar
  60. Miller, G. L. (1991b). Thoughts towards a user’s guide to ceramic assemblages, part I: lumping sites into mega-assemblages by those that cannot tell time. Council for Northeast Historical Archaeology Newsletter 18: 2–5.Google Scholar
  61. Newman, R. (2013). The Eastern Gate Hotel Site, Cambridge: An Archaeological Excavation, Cambridge Archaeological Unit report 1176, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  62. Pearce, J. I. (2000). A late 18th-century inn clearance assemblage from Uxbridge, Middlesex. Post-Medieval Archaeology 34: 144–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pearce, J. I. (2007). Consumption of creamware: London archaeological evidence. In Walford, T., and Massey, R. (ed.), Creamware and Pearlware Re-examined, English Ceramic Circle, Beckenham, pp. 231–253.Google Scholar
  64. Pearce, J., and Taylor, R. (2013). The stock-in-trade of a Parish Scavenger: an 18th-century community reflected in refuse from excavations at 9 and 11 Duke Street, London. Post-Medieval Archaeology 47: 281–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Praetzellis, A. (1998). Introduction: why every archaeologist should tell stories once in a while. Historical Archaeology 32: 1–3.Google Scholar
  66. Prosser, L., Lawrence, S., Brooks, A., and Lennon, J. (2012). Household archaeology, lifecycles and status in a nineteenth-century Australian coastal community. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 16: 809–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rixson, D. (2000). The History of Meat Trading, Nottingham University Press, Nottingham.Google Scholar
  68. Rockman, D. D., and Rothschild, N. A. (1984). City tavern, country tavern: an analysis of four colonial sites. Historical Archaeology 18: 112–121.Google Scholar
  69. Rotman, D. L. (2005). Newlyweds, young families, and spinsters: a consideration of developmental cycle in historical archaeologies of gender. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 9: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rotman, D. L. (2009). Historical Archaeology of Gendered Lives, Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schiffer, M. B. (1985). Is there a “Pompeii Premise” in archaeology? Journal of Anthropological Research 41: 18–41.Google Scholar
  72. Sheller, M., and Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A 38: 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. South, S. (1977). Method and Theory in Historical Archaeology, Academic, New York.Google Scholar
  74. Tarlow, S. (2000). Emotion in archaeology. Current Anthropology 41: 713–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Trotter, D. (2008). Household clearances in Victorian fiction. 19: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century 6: 1–19. http://www.19.bbk.ac.uk/issue6/papers/trotterhouseholdclearances.pdf.
  76. Turnbaugh, W., and Peabody Turnbagh, S. (1977). Alternative applications of the mean ceramic date concept for interpreting human behavior. Historical Archaeology 11: 90–104.Google Scholar
  77. Turner, M. E., Beckett, J. V., and Afton, B. (2001). Farm Production in England 1700–1914, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  78. Turner, M. E., Beckett, J., and Afton, B. (2003). Crop Yields and Animal Carcass Weights in England, c.1700–1914. Computer file, distributor UK Data Archive, Colchester, Essex, SN: 4517.Google Scholar
  79. Tyler, K., Betts, I., and Stephenson, R. (2008). London’s Delftware Industry: The Tin-Glazed Pottery Industries of Southwark and Lambeth, MoLAS Monograph 40, LondonGoogle Scholar
  80. Venn, J. (1897). Biographical History of Gonville and Caius College, 1349–1897, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  81. Vince, A. G., and Egan, G. (1981). The contents of a late 18th century pit at Crosswall, City of London. Transactions of the London Middlesex Archaeological Society 32: 159–182.Google Scholar
  82. Wheeler, K. (2000). Theoretical and methodological considerations for excavating privies. Historical Archaeology 34: 3–19.Google Scholar
  83. White, C. L. (2005). American Items of Personal Adornment, 1680–1820: A Guide to Identification and Interpretation, AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek.Google Scholar
  84. White, C. L. (2008). Personal adornment and interlaced identities at the Sherburne Site, Portsmouth, New Hampshire. Historical Archaeology 28: 17–37.Google Scholar
  85. White, C. L. (ed.) (2009). The Materiality of Individuality, Archaeological Studies of Individual Lives, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  86. White, C. L., and Beaudry, M. C. (2009). Artifacts and personal identity. In Gaimster, D., and Majewski, T. (ed.), International Handbook of Historical Archaeology, London, Springer, pp. 209–225.Google Scholar
  87. Whiter, L. (1970). Spode: A History of the Family, Factory and Wares from 1733 to 1833, Barrie and Jenkins, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cambridge Archaeological UnitCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations