Won with Blood: Archaeology and Labor’s Struggle

  • Randall H. McGuireEmail author


Traditionally when Americans went to work they expected that they would earn a reasonable wage, work in a safe environment, put in a 40 h week, collect paid vacation days, earn sick leave, have the right to organize and receive health and retirement benefits. Increasingly, however, fewer and fewer workers receive these rights and today only a minority of people in the United States work under these conditions. The decline in real wages, benefits, rights and safety experienced by twenty-first century American workers has correlated with a decline in organized labor. Corporations and the right have assailed unions to erode worker’s rights and “increase competitiveness” in a globalized, neo-liberal, capitalist, world. The attacks on unions spring from a monstrous lie, that politicians and corporations gave labor these benefits and thus workers no longer need unions. On the battlefield of public policy, these assaults on organized labor work in a fundamentally ideological way that calls the continued existence of unions into question. In this paper, I will discuss how archaeological studies of labor’s struggle can reveal that contrary to the monstrous lie, workers and their families won worker’s rights with blood and that solidarity and organization remain essential to maintain these rights. The paper begins with the present state of labor’s struggle and looks to the past to consider its preconditions. Archaeologists have studied strikes, the lived experience of working class life and class war to study history backwards and these studies contribute to the labor’s struggle for the future.


Class struggle Working class Fast capitalism 


  1. Agger, B. (2004). Speeding Up Fast Capitalism: Cultures, Jobs, Families, Schools, Bodies, Paradigm, Boulder.Google Scholar
  2. Barile, K., and Brandon, J. C. (eds.) (2004). Household Chores and Household Choices: Theorizing the Domestic Sphere in Historical Archaeology, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
  3. Bassett, E. (1994). “We took care of each other like families were meant to”: gender, social organization, and wage labor among the Apache at Roosevelt. In Scott, E. M. (ed.), Those of Little Note: Gender, Race, and Class in Historical Archaeology, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 55–79.Google Scholar
  4. Beaudry, M. (ed.) (1988). Documentary Archaeology in the New World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. Beaudry, M. (2007). Findings: The Material Culture of Needlework and Sewing, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  6. Beaudry, M., and Mrozowski, S. (1988). The archaeology of work and home life in Lowell, Massachusetts: an interdisciplinary study of the Boott Cotton Mills Corporation. Industrial Archaeology 19: 1–22.Google Scholar
  7. De Cunzo, L. A., and Herman, B. L. (eds.) (1996). Historical Archaeology and the Study of American Culture, Henry Francis du Pont Winterthur Museum, Winterthur.Google Scholar
  8. Delle, J. A., Mrozowski, S. A., and Paynter, R. (eds.) (2000). Lines That Divide: Historical Archaeologies of Race, Class, and Gender, University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.Google Scholar
  9. Durrenberger, E. P. (2007). The anthropology of organized labor in the United States. Annual Review of Anthropology 36: 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fleck, S., Glaser, J., and Sprague, S. (2011). The compensation-productivity gap: a visual essay. Monthly Labor Review. January: 57–79.Google Scholar
  11. Hale, C. (2006). Activist research v. cultural critique: indigenous land rights and the contradictions of politically engaged anthropology. Cultural Anthropology 21: 96–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hill, J. (1923). Workers of the world awaken. I.W.W. Songs to Fan the Flames of Discontent. 19th ed. Industrial Workers of the World, Chicago.Google Scholar
  13. Holmes, D. (2000). Integral Europe: Fast-Capitalism, Multiculturalism, and Neofacism, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  14. Larkin, K., and McGuire, R. H. (eds.) (2009). The Archaeology of Class War: The Colorado Coalfield Strike of 1913–1914, University of Colorado Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
  15. Leone, M. (1995). A historical archaeology of capitalism. American Anthropologist 97: 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leone, M. P., and Potter Jr., P. B. (1988). Introduction: issues in historical archaeology. In Leone, M. P., and Potter Jr., P. B. (eds.), The Recovery of Meaning: Historical Archaeology in the Eastern United States, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
  17. Leone, M. P., and Potter Jr., P. B. (eds.) (1999). Historical Archaeologies of Capitalism, Kluwer, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Little, B. (ed.) (1992). Text-Aided Archaeology, CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
  19. Little, B. (2011). Epilogue: changing the world with archaeology. In Stottman, M. J. (ed.), Archaeologists as Activists: Can Archaeology Change the World? University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, pp. 154–158.Google Scholar
  20. McGuire, R. H. (2004). Colorado coalfield massacre. Archaeology Magazine 57(6): 62–70.Google Scholar
  21. Nassaney, M., and Abel, M. (1993). The political and social contexts of cutlery production in the Connecticut Valley. Dialectical Anthropology 18: 247–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nida, B. and Adkins, M. J. (2010). The social and environmental upheaval of BlairMountain: a working class struggle for unionization and historic preservation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Saint Louis. MO.Google Scholar
  23. Nyden, P. J. (2012). Federal Judge Upholds Blair Mountain Battlefield removal, The Charleston Gazette, Charleston.Google Scholar
  24. Patel, S. S. (2012). Mountain top rescue. Archaeology Magazine 65(1): 122–128.Google Scholar
  25. Saitta, D. (2004). Desecration at Ludlow. New Labor Forum 13: 84–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Saitta, D. (2007). The Archaeology of Collective Action, University of Florida Press, Gainesville.Google Scholar
  27. Shackel, P. A. (2000). Craft to wage labor: agency and resistance in American historical archaeology. In Robb, J., and Dobres, M. (eds.), Agency Theory in Archaeology, Routledge, London, pp. 232–246.Google Scholar
  28. Shackel, P. A. (2009). The Archaeology of American Labor and Working-Class Life, University of Florida Press, Gainesville.Google Scholar
  29. Shackel, P. A., and Roller, M. (2012). The Gilded Age wasn’t so gilded in the anthracite region of Pennsylvania. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 16: 761–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wallerstein, I. M. (2000). The Essential Wallerstein, New Press, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Wood, M. (2009). Building the corporate family: constructing homes, families, and the Nation. In Larkin, K., and McGuire, R. H. (eds.), The Archaeology of Class War: The Colorado Coalfield Strike of 1913–1914, University of Colorado Press, Boulder, pp. 123–160.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyBinghamton UniversityBinghamtonUSA

Personalised recommendations