Abstract
“Powered cultural landscapes” is my term for landscapes that express social power dynamics. Historical archaeologists have not adopted or developed adequate definitions or theorizations of the terms “power” or “landscape.” Since these terms are predominantly considered separately in the literature, this article first briefly defines power and develops a heterarchical theory of power. Then cultural landscapes are defined and categories of human-landscape interactions are constructed. The bulk of the article applies my heterarchical paradigm to analyze the social power dynamics in selected examples of historical archaeological research concerned with each category of human-landscape interaction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agnew, A. B. (1995). Women and property in early 19th century Portsmouth, New Hampshire. Historical Archaeology 29(1): 62–75.
Barile, K. S. (2004). Hegemony within the household: The perspective from a South Carolina plantation. In Barile, K. S., and Brandon, J. C. (eds.), Household Chores and Household Choices: Theorizing the Domestic Sphere in Historical Archaeology, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, pp. 121–137.
Battle, W. (2004). A space of our own: Redefining the enslaved household at Andrew Jackson’s Hermitage Plantation. In Barile, K. S., and Brandon, J. C. (eds.), Household Chores and Household Choices: Theorizing the Domestic Sphere in Historical Archaeology, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, pp. 33–50.
Baugher, S. B. (2001). Visible charity: The archaeology, material culture, and landscape design of New York City’s Municipal Almshouse complex, 1736–1797. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 5: 175–202.
Baugher, S. B., and Spencer-Wood, S. M. (eds.) (2010). The Archaeology and Preservation of Gendered Landscapes, Springer, New York.
Baugher, S. (2010). Landscapes of Power: Middle Class and Lower Class Power Dynamics in a New York Charitable Institution. International Journal of Historical Archaeology. doi:10.1007/s10761-010-0120-z
Beaudry, M. C., and Mrozowski, S. A. (2001). Cultural space and worker identity in the company city: Nineteenth-century Lowell, Massachusetts. In Mayne, A., and Murray, T. (eds.), The Archaeology of Urban Landscapes: Explorations in Slumland, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 118–132.
Beaudry, M. C., Cook, L. J., and Mrozowski, S. A. (1991). Artifacts and active voices: material culture as social discourse. In McGuire, R. H., and Paynter, R. (eds.), The Archaeology of Inequality, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 150–192.
Benton, M. (1981). “Objective” interests and the sociology of power. Sociology 15: 161–184.
Bhabha, H. (1997). Of mimicry and man: The ambivalence of colonial discourses. In Stoler, A. L., and Cooper, F. (eds.), Tensions of Empire: Colonial Cultures in a Bourgeois World, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 152–198.
Binford, L. (1983). Working at Archaeology, Academic, New York.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Nice, R. (trans.) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Braudel, F. (1972). The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Phillip II. Reynolds, S. (trans.), Harper and Row, New York.
Casella, E. C. (2001). To watch or restrain: Female convict prisons in nineteenth-century Tasmania. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 5(1): 45–72.
Casella, E. C. (2007). The Archaeology of Institutional Confinement, University Press of Florida, Gainsville.
Casella, E. C., and Fowler, C. (2005). Beyond identification: An introduction. In Casella, E. C., and Fowler, C. (eds.), The Archaeology of Plural and Changing Identities, Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, pp. 1–8.
Clisby, H. (n.d.). History of the WEIU. Women’s Educational and Industrial Union records, 1877-. Schlesinger Library of the History of Women in America, Radcliffe Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge.
Cowgill, G. L. (2000). “Rationality” and contexts in agency theory. In Dobres, M., and Robb, J. E. (eds.), Agency in Archaeology, Routledge, London, pp. 51–61.
Crumley, C. L. (1987). A dialectical critique of hierarchy. In Patterson, T. C., and Gailey, C. W. (eds.), Power Relations and State Formation, American Anthropological Association, Washington D.C., pp. 155–169.
Dawdy, S. L. (2006). Proper caresses and prudent distance: A how-to manual from colonial Louisiana. In Stoler, A. L. (ed.), Haunted by Empire: Geographies of Intimacy in North American History, Duke University Press, Durham, pp. 140–163.
De Cunzo, L. A. (1995). Reform, respite, ritual: An archaeology of institutions—The Magdalen Society of Philadelphia, 1800–1850. Historical Archaeology 29(3): 1–168.
De Cunzo, L. A. (2001). On reforming the “fallen” and beyond: Transforming continuity at the Magdalen Society of Philadelphia, 1845–1916. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 5: 19–44.
De Cunzo, L. A. (2004). A Historical Archaeology of Delaware: People, Contexts and the Cultures of Agriculture, University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.
De Cunzo, L. A. (2006). Exploring the institution: Reform, cofinement, social change. In Hall, M., and Silliman, S. W. (eds.), Historical Archaeology, Blackwell, Malden, MA, pp. 190–208.
Deetz, J. F. (1988). Material culture and worldview in colonial Anglo-America. In Leone, M. P., and Potter Jr., P. B. (eds.), The Recovery of Meaning: Historical Archaeology in the Eastern United States, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C., pp. 219–235.
Deetz, J. F. (1996). In Small Things Forgotten: The Archaeology of Early American Life, Anchor Books, New York.
Delle, J. A. (1999a). “A good and easy speculation”: Spatial conflict, collusion, and resistance in late sixteenth-century Munster, Ireland. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 3: 11–35.
Delle, J. A. (1999b). The landscapes of class negotiation on coffee plantations in the Blue Mountains of Jamaica, 1790–1850. Historical Archaeology 33(1): 136–159.
Febvre, L. (2000). A Geographical Introduction to History, Columbia University Press, New York.
Fesler, G. R. (2004). Living arrangements among enslaved women and men at an early-eighteenth-century Virginia quartering site. In Galle, J. E., and Young, A. L. (eds.), Engendering African American Archaeology: A Southern Perspective, University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, pp. 177–237.
Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality. Volume I: Introduction. Hurley, R. (trans.) Pantheon, New York.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. Gordon, C. (ed.). Pantheon, New York.
Foucault, M. (1988). The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom: An interview. Gauthier, J. D. (trans.) In Bernauer, J., and Rasmussen, D. (eds.), The Final Foucault, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–21.
Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Sheridan, A. (trans.) Vintage, New York.
Frazer, B. (1999). Reconceptualizing resistance in the historical archaeology of the British Isles: An editorial. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 3: 1–10.
Funari, P. P. A. (2003). Conflict and the interpretation of Palmares, a Brazilian runaway polity. Historical Archaeology 37(3): 81–92.
Geier, C. R. (2003). Confederate fortification and troop deployment in a mountain landscape: Fort Edward Johnson and Camp Sheannandoah, April 1862. Historical Archaeology 37(3): 31–46.
Hall, M. (2000). Archaeology and the Modern World: Colonial transcripts in South Africa and the Chesapeake, Routledge, London.
Hardesty, D. L. (1994). Class, gender strategies, and material culture in the mining West. In Scott, E. M. (ed.), Those of Little Note: Gender, Race, and Class in Historical Archaeology, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 129–149.
Hardesty, D. L. (1998). Power and the industrial mining community in the American West. In Knapp, A. B., Pigott, V. C., and Herbert, E. W. (eds.), Social Approaches to an Industrial Past: The Anthropology and Archaeology of Mining, Routledge, London.
Heberling, P. M. (1987). Status indicators: Another strategy for interpretation of settlement pattern in a nineteenth-century industrial village. In Spencer-Wood, S. M. (ed.), Consumer Choice in Historical Archaeology, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 199–217.
Henretta, J. A. (1991). The Origins of American Capitalism: Collected Essays, Northeastern University Press, Boston.
Hodder, I., and Hutson, S. (2003). Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hooks, B. (1984). Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center, South End Press, Cambridge.
Huataniemi, S. I., and Rotman, D. L. (2004). To the hogs or to the house? Municipal water and gender relations at the Moors Site in Deerfield, Massachusetts. In Rotman, D. L., and Savulis, E. (eds.), Shared Spaces and Divided Places: Material Dimensions of Gender Relations and the American Historical Landscape, University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, pp. 135–159.
Insoll, T. (2005). Changing identities in the Arabian Gulf: Archaeology, religion and ethnicity in context. In Casella, E. C., and Fowler, C. (eds.), The Archaeology of Plural and Changing Identities, Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, pp. 191–210.
Jamieson, R. W. (2005). Caste in Cuenca: Colonial identity in the seventeenth century Andes. In Casella, E. C., and Fowler, C. (eds.), The Archaeology of Plural and Changing Identities, Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, pp. 211–232.
Kehoe, A. B. (1999). A resort to subtler contrivances. In Sweely, T. L. (ed.), Manifesting Power: Gender and the Interpretation of Power in Archaeology, Routledge, London, pp. 30–48.
Kelso, G. K. (1996). Pollen analysis in urban historical landscape research. In De Cunzo, L. A., and Herman, B. L. (eds.), Historical Archaeology and the Study of American Culture, University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, pp. 259–284.
Kolodny, A. (1975). The Lay of the Land: Metaphor as Experience and History in American Life and Letters, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
Kovacik, J. J. (2002). Radical agency, households, and communities: Networks of power. In O’Donovan, M. (ed.), The Dynamics of Power, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 51–66.
Kwolek-Folland, A. (2002). Incorporating Women: A History of Women and Business in the United States, Palgrave, New York.
Larsen, C. (2006). The penny pinch. In Dubeck, P. J., and Dunn, D. (eds.), Workplace/Women’s Place: An Anthology, Roxbury, Los Angeles, pp. 77–83.
Lucas, G. (1999). The archaeology of the workhouse: The changing uses of the workhouse buildings at St Mary’s, Southampton. In Tarlow, S., and West, S. (eds.), The Familiar Past: Archaeologies of Later Historical Britain, Routledge, London, pp. 125–139.
Marquardt, W. H., and Crumley, C. L. (1987). Theoretical issues in the analysis of spatial patterning. In Crumley, C. L., and Marquardt, W. H. (eds.), Regional Dynamics: Burgundian Landscapes in Historical Perspective, Academic, San Diego, pp. 1–18.
McDonald, J. D., Zimmerman, L. J., McDonald, A. L., Tall Bull, W., and Rising Sun, T. (1991). The Northern Cheyenne Outbreak of 1879: Using oral history and archaeology as tools of resistance. In McGuire, R. H., and Paynter, R. (eds.), The Archaeology of Inequality, Blackwell, London, pp. 64–78.
McKee, L. (1996). The archaeology of Rachel’s garden. In Yamin, R., and Metheny, K. B. (eds.), Landscape Archaeology: Reading and Interpreting the American Historical Landscape, University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, pp. 70–91.
Meskell, L. (1996). The somatization of archaeology: Institutions, discourses, corporeality. Norwegian Archaeological Review 29: 1–16.
Meskell, L. (2001). Archaeologies of identity. In Hodder, I. (ed.), Archaeological Theory Today, Polity Press, Oxford, pp. 187–213.
Metheny, K. B., Kratzer, J., Yentsch, A. E., and Goodwin, C. M. (1996). Method in landscape archaeology: Research strategies in a historic New Jersey garden. In Yamin, R., and Metheny, K. B. (eds.), Landscape Archaeology: Reading and Interpreting the American Historical Landscape, University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, pp. 6-32.
Miller, D., and Tilley, C. (eds.) (1984). Ideology, Power, and Prehistory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Mohanty, C. T. (1991). Introduction—cartographies of struggle: Third World women and the politics of feminism. In Russo, A., Lordes, T., and Mohanty, C. T. (eds.), Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 1–51.
Morris, W. (ed.) (1969). The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, American Heritage, New York.
Mrozowski, S. A. (2006). Environments of history: Biological dimensions of historical archaeology. In Hall, M., and Silliman, S. W. (eds.), Historical Archaeology, Blackwell, Malden, MA, pp. 23–41.
Mrozowski, S. A., and Beaudry, M. C. (1990). Archaeology and the landscape of corporate ideology. In Kelso, W. M., and Most, R. (eds.), Earth Patterns: Essays in Landscape Archaeology, University of Virginia Press, Charlottesville, pp. 189–208.
Mullins, P. R. (1999). Race and Affluence: An Archaeology of African America and Consumer Culture, Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York.
Nassaney, M. S., Rotman, D. L., Sayers, D. O., and Nickolai, C. A. (2001). The Southwest Michigan Historic Landscape Project: Exploring class, gender, and ethnicity from the ground up. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 5: 219–261.
O’Donovan, M. (2002). Grasping power: A question of relations and scales. In O’Donovan, M. (ed.), The Dynamics of Power, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 19–34.
Orser Jr., C. E. (1987). Plantation status and consumer choice: A materialist framework for historical archaeology. In Spencer-Wood, S. M. (ed.), Consumer Choice in Historical Archaeology, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 121–138.
Orser Jr., C. E. (1988). Toward a theory of power for historical archaeology: Plantations and space. In Leone, M. P., and Potter Jr., P. B. (eds.), The Recovery of Meaning: Historical Archaeology in the Eastern United States, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C., pp. 313–344.
Orser Jr., C. E. (1996). A Historical Archaeology of the Modern World, Plenum Press, New York.
Palus, M. M., Leone, M. P., and Cochran, M. D. (2006). Critical archaeology: Politics past and present. In Hall, M., and Silliman, S. W. (eds.), Historical Archaeology, Blackwell, Malden, MA, pp. 84–107.
Pappas, E. I. (2004). Fictive kin in the mountains: The paternalistic metaphor and households in a California logging camp. In Barile, K. S., and Brandon, J. C. (eds.), Household Chores and Household Choices: Theorizing the Domestic Sphere in Historical Archaeology, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, pp. 159–178.
Pauls, E. P. (2006). The place of space: Architecture, landscape and social life. In Hall, M., and Silliman, S. W. (eds.), Historical Archaeology, Blackwell, Malden, MA, pp. 65–84.
Paynter, R. (1982). Models of Spatial Inequality: Settlement Patterns in Historical Archeology, Academic, New York.
Paynter, R., and McGuire, R. H. (1991). The archaeology of inequality: Material culture, domination, and resistance. In McGuire, R. H., and Paynter, R. (eds.), The Archaeology of Inequality, Blackwell, London, pp. 1–27.
Piddock, S. (2001). “An irregular and inconvenient pile of buildings”: The destitute asylum of Adelaide, South Australia and the English workhouse. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 5: 73–96.
Pluciennik, M., Mientjes, A., and Giannitrapant, E. (2004). Archaeologies of aspiration: historical archaeology in rural central Sicily. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 8: 27–65.
Rabinow, R. (1984). The Foucault Reader, Pantheon, New York.
Rotman, D. L. (2003). Introduction: Exploring shared spaces and divided places on the American historical landscape. In Rotman, D. L., and Savulis, E. (eds.), Shared Spaces and Divided Places: Material Dimensions of Gender Relations and the American Historical Landscape, University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, pp. 1–23.
Rotman, D. L., and Nassaney, M. S. (1997). Class, gender and the built environment: Deriving social relations from cultural landscapes in southwest Michigan. Historical Archaeology 31(2): 42–62.
Rubin, G. (1984). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In Vance, C. S. (ed.), Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality, Routledge and Kegan Paul, Boston, pp. 267–319.
Russell, L. (2005). Either, or, neither, nor”: Resisting the production of gender, race and class dichotomies in the pre-colonial period. In Casella, E. C., and Fowler, C. (eds.), The Archaeology of Plural and Changing Identities, Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, pp. 33–55.
Said, E. W. (1989). Foucault and the imagination of power. In Hoy, D. C. (ed.), Foucault: A Critical Reader, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 149–157.
Sayers, D. O., and Nassaney, M. S. (1999). Antebellum landscapes and agrarian political economies: Modeling progressive farmsteads in southwest Michigan. The Michigan Archaeologist 45(3): 74–117.
Scott, E. M. (1991). Fort Michilimackinaw. Historical Archaeology 24(1): 42–54.
Scott, E. M. (1994). Those of Little Note: Gender, Race, and Class in Historical Archaeology, University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
Scott, D. D. (2003). Oral tradition and archaeology: Conflict and concordance examples from two Indian war sites. Historical Archaeology 37(3): 55–66.
Scott, E. M. (2004). Introduction: Gender research in African American archaeology. In Galle, J. E., and Young, A. L. (eds.), Engendering African American Archaeology, University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, pp. 1–19.
Seifert, D. (1991). Introduction. Historical Archaeology 24(1): 1–3.
Shackel, P. A. (ed.) (2003). Remembering landscapes of conflict. Historical Archaeology 37(3): 1–148.
Shanks, M., and Tilley, C. (1992). Re-constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice, Routledge, London.
Silliman, S. W. (2006). Struggling with labor, working with identities. In Hall, M., and Silliman, S. W. (eds.), Historical Archaeology, Blackwell, Malden, MA, pp. 147–167.
Singleton, T. A. (1988). An archaeological framework for slavery and emancipation, 1740–1880. In Leone, M. P., and Potter Jr., P. B. (eds.), The Recovery of Meaning: Historical Archaeology in the Eastern United States, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C., pp. 345–370.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1978). Part IV. Overview of Regional Cultural Development. C. Historic. In Casjens, L. (ed.), A Cultural Resource Overview of the Green Mountain National Forest, Vermont, Institute for Conservation Archaeology, Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Cambridge, pp. 53–86.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1980). Section II. Documentary Research. In Final Report/Data Recovery Operations at the Shaw (Moose Hill Reservoir) Site, Upper Quaboag Watershed, Massachusetts, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., pp. 9–79.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1981). The Shaw gristmill and house sites, Leicester, Massachusetts. Archaeological Quarterly 4: 1–30.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1987). A survey of domestic reform movement sites in Boston and Cambridge, c. 1865–1905. Historical Archaeology 21(2): 7–36.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1991a). Towards an historical archaeology of materialistic domestic reform. In McGuire, R. M., and Paynter, R. (eds.), The Archaeology of Inequality, Blackwell Oxford, pp. 231–286.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1991b). Towards a feminist historical archaeology of the construction of gender. In Walde, D., and Willows, N. D. (eds.), The Archaeology of Gender: Proceedings of the 22nd Chacmool Conference, University of Calgary Archaeological Association, Calgary, pp. 234–44.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1992). A feminist program for non-sexist archaeology. In Wandsnider, L. (ed.), Quandaries and Quests: Visions of Archaeology’s Future, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, pp. 98–114.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1993). Review of The Recovery of Meaning: Historical Archaeology in the Eastern United States, by Mark P. Leone and Parker B. Potter. Bulletin of the History of Archaeology 3(1): 27–35.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1994a). Turn of the century women’s organizations, urban design, and the origin of the American playground movement. Landscape Journal 13: 125–138.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1994b). Diversity in 19th-century domestic reform: Relationships among classes and ethnic groups. In Scott, E. M. (ed.), Those of Little Note: Gender, Race and Class in Historical Archaeology, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 175–208.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1995). Toward the further development of feminist historical archaeology. World Archaeological Bulletin 7: 118–136.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1996). Feminist historical archaeology and the transformation of American culture by domestic reform movements, 1840–1925. In De Cunzo, L. A., and Herman, B. L. (eds.), Historical Archaeology and the Study of American Culture, Winterthur Museum and University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, pp. 397–446.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1997). Feminist Inclusive Theory: Crossing Boundaries in Theory and Practice. Paper delivered at the Fourth Australian Women in Archaeology Conference, Cairns, Australia.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1999a). Gendering power. In Sweely, T. L. (ed.), Manifesting Power: Gender and the Interpretation of Power in Archaeology, Routledge, London, pp. 175–183.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1999b). The formation of ethnic-American identities: Jewish communities in Boston. In Funari, P. P. A., Hall, M., and Jones, S. (eds.), Historical Archaeology: Back from the Edge, Routledge, London, pp. 284–307.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2000). Strange attractors: Feminist theory, non-linear systems theory, and their implications for archaeological theory. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.), Social Theory in Archaeology, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 112–25.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2001a). Phase I Non-Destructive Archaeological Survey of the Souther Tide Mill Site, Quincy, Massachusetts, Massachusetts Historical Commission, Boston.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2001b). Views and commentaries: What difference does feminist theory make? International Journal of Historical Archaeology 5: 97–114.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2002a). Utopian visions and architectural designs of turn-of-the-century social settlements. In Bingaman, A., Shapiro, L., and Zorach, R. (eds.), Embodied Utopias: Gender, Social Change and the Modern Metropolis. Routledge, London, pp. 116–132.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2002b). Feminist theory. In Orser Jr., C. E. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Historical Archaeology, Routledge, London, pp. 205–9.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2002c). The historical archaeology of 19th-century American cultural landscapes: A review. Landscape Journal 21: 173–83.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2003). Gendering the creation of green urban landscapes at the turn of the century. In Rotman, D. L., and Savulis, E. (eds.), Shared Spaces and Divided Places: Material Dimensions of Gender Relations and the American Historical Landscape, University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, pp. 24–61.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2004a). A historic pay-for-housework community household: The Cambridge Cooperative Housekeeping Society. In Barile, K. S., and Brandon, J. C. (eds.), Household Chores and Household Choices: Theorizing the Domestic Sphere in Historical Archaeology, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, pp. 138–158.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2004b). What difference does feminist theory make in researching households? A commentary. In Barile, K. S., and Brandon, J. C. (eds.), Household Chores and Household Choices: Theorizing the Domestic Sphere in Historical Archaeology, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, pp. 235–253.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2005). Feminist boundary crossings: Challenging androcentric assumptions and stereotypes about hideworking. In Frink, L., and Weedman, K. (eds.), Gender and Hide Production, Altamira, Walnut Creek, CA, pp. 197–213.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2006). A feminist theoretical approach to the historical archaeology of utopian communities. Historical Archaeology 40(1): 152–185.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2007). Feminist theory and gender research in historical archaeology. In Nelson, S. M. (ed.), Women in Antiquity: Theoretical Approaches to Gender and Archaeology, Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, CA, pp. 29–74.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2009). A feminist approach to European ideologies of poverty and the institutionalization of the poor in Falmouth, Massachusetts. In Beisaw, A., and Gibb, J. (eds.), The Historical Archaeology of Institutional Life, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, pp. 117–137.
Starbuck, D. R. (2003). Neither Plain Nor Simple: New Perspectives on the Canterbury Shakers, University Press of New England, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Stewart-Abernathy, L. C. (2004). Separate kitchens and intimate archaeology: Constructing urban slavery on the antebellum cotton frontier in Washington, Arkansas. In Barile, K. S., and Brandon, J. C. (eds.), Household Chores and Household Choices: Theorizing the Domestic Sphere in Historical Archaeology, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, pp. 51–74.
Stoler, A. L. (ed.) (2006). Haunted by Empire: Geographies of Intimacy in North American History, Duke University Press, Durham.
Sweely, T. L. (1999). Introduction. In Sweely, T. L. (ed.), Manifesting Power: Gender and the Interpretation of Power in Archaeology, Routledge, London, pp. 1–14.
Symonds, J. (1999). Toiling in the vale of tears: Everyday life and resistance in South Uist, Outer Hebrides 1760-1860. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 3: 101–122.
Voss, B. L. (2008). The Archaeology of Ethnogenesis: Race and Sexuality in Colonial San Francisco, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Voss, B. L., and Schmidt, R. A. (2000). Archaeologies of sexuality: An introduction. In Schmidt, R. A., and Voss, B. L. (eds.), Archaeologies of Sexuality, Routledge, London, pp. 1–35.
Wall, D. diZ. (1994). The Archaeology of Gender: Separating the Spheres in Urban America, Plenum Press, New York.
Weber, M. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Parsons, T. (trans.). Free Press, New York.
Wolf, E. (1990). Distinguished lecture: Facing power—old insights, new questions. American Anthropologist 92: 586–596.
Wylie, A. (1992). Feminist theories of social power: Some implications for a processual archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review 25(1): 51–68.
Yentsch, A. E. (1991). The symbolic divisions of pottery: Sex-related attributes of English and Anglo-American household pots. In McGuire, R. M., and Paynter, R. (eds.), The Archaeology of Inequality, Blackwell, Cambridge, pp. 192–230.
Yentsch, A. E. (1994). A Chesapeake Family and Their Slaves: A Study in Historical Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Yentsch, A. E. (1996). Introduction: Close attention to place, landscape studies by historical archaeologists. In Yamin, R., and Metheny, K. B. (eds.), Landscape Archaeology: Reading and Interpreting the American Historical Landscape, University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, pp. xxiii–xlii.
Young, A. (2003). Gender and landscape: A view from the plantation slave community. In Rotman, D. L., and Savulis, E. (eds.), Shared Spaces and Divided Places: Material Dimensions of Gender Relations and the American Historical Landscape, University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, pp. 104–134.
Zierden, M. A. (1996). The urban landscape, the work yard, and archaeological site formation processes in Charleston, South Carolina. In De Cunzo, L. A., and Herman, B. L. (eds.), Historical Archaeology and the Study of American Culture, The Henry Francis du Pont Winterthur Museum, Winterthur, pp. 285–318.
Zierden, M. A. (2010). Landscape and Social Relations at Charleston Townhouse Sites (1770–1850). International Journal of Historical Archaeology. doi:10.1007/s10761-010-0124-8
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spencer-Wood, S.M. A Feminist Framework for Analyzing Powered Cultural Landscapes in Historical Archaeology. Int J Histor Archaeol 14, 498–526 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761-010-0122-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761-010-0122-x