Peck-Marked Vessels from the San José Market Street Chinatown: A Study of Distribution and Significance

  • Gina MichaelsEmail author


Ceramic bowls and plates with Chinese characters pecked into their surfaces are documented on almost every nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Chinatown site in California. Typically, these vessels are said to bear marks of ownership, and further analysis has been uncommon. Given the socio-political atmosphere surrounding Chinese immigration and labor during this time period, as well as the cultural relevance of this marking practice, it is the author's belief that this explanation is incomplete. Through analysis of archaeological materials from the Market Street Chinatown in San José, California, this paper explores the possibility that Chinese immigrants were using and hybridizing the familiar Chinese cultural practice of marking vessels to aid in creating an environment within the Chinatown that was both more comfortable and more livable.


Chinatown porcelain peck marks hybridization 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen, R., Baxter, R. S., Medin, A., Costello, J., and Young Yu, C. (2002). Excavation of the Woolen Mills Chinatown, (CA-SCL-807H), San José, Report to the California Department of Transportation, District 4, Oakland.Google Scholar
  2. Barth, G. (1964). Bitter Strength, A History of the Chinese in the United States 1850–1870, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  3. Bhabba, H. (1994). The Location of Culture, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction, A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  6. Diehl, M., Waters, J. A., and Thiel, J. H. (1998). Acculturation and the Composition of the Diet of Tucson's Overseas Chinese Gardeners at the Turn of the Century. Historical Archaeology 32(4): 19–33.Google Scholar
  7. Ferguson, L. G. (1999). This cross is a magic sign. In Singleton, T. A. (ed.), I Too Am American, Archaeological Studies of African-American Life, University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville, pp. 116–131.Google Scholar
  8. Greenwood, R. S. (1996). Down By The Station: Los Angeles Chinatown, 1880–1933, Los Angeles Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  9. Kapchan, D. A. (1996). Gender on the Market: Moroccan Women and the Revoicing of Tradition, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  10. Laffey, G. A. (1993). The Early Chinatowns of San José, Basin Research Associates, San Leandro, CA.Google Scholar
  11. Laffey, G. A. (1994). Lot Histories For the Block 1 Chinatown San José, California, Basin Research Associates, San Leandro, CA.Google Scholar
  12. Leonard, K. (2001). Finding one's own place: Asian landscapes re-visioned in rural California. In Gupta, A., and Ferguson, J. (eds.), Culture Power Place, Explorations in Critical Anthropology, Duke University Press, Durham, pp. 118–136.Google Scholar
  13. Lister, F. C., and Lister, R. H. (1989). The Chinese of Early Tucson: Historic Archaeology from the Tucson Urban Renewal Project, Anthropological Papers of the University of Arizona 52, Tucson.Google Scholar
  14. Praetzellis, A. (1999). The archaeology of ethnicity: An example from Sacramento California's early Chinese District. In Egan, G. and Michael, R. L. (eds.), Old and New Worlds: Historical/Post Medieval Archaeology Papers, Oxbow, Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. Praetzellis, M., and Praetzellis, A. (1997). Historical Archaeology of an Overseas Chinese Community in Sacramento California. Vol. 1 Archaeological Excavations, Sonoma State University Anthropological Studies Center, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  16. Young Yu, C. (1991). Chinatown San José, USA, History San José, San José.Google Scholar
  17. Young Yu, C. (2003). Oral Historical Work with the Chinese-American Community in San José. Lecture at the Department of Social and Cultural Anthropology, Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ArchaeologySimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations