Abstract
Mobile phones have become essential learning tools with their extensive features and functionalities, contributing to the emergence of mobile learning. These devices enable communication and collaboration both inside and outside the classrooms while also aiding in information seeking, collection, and content generation. Yet, the use of mobile phones in education is met with varying opinions; while some view them as potentially distracting, others see them as facilitators of learning environments. Personal traits, such as previous knowledge, motivation, and needs, significantly influence the educational use of mobile phones. Consequently, this study aimed to investigate undergraduate students’ educational mobile phone use and explore the effect of certain learner characteristics (demographic characteristics, technology-use-related characteristics, the motives for mobile phone use, self-directed learning, and self-efficacy beliefs) on mobile phone use in an academic environment (MPUAE). The participants consisted of 1928 students from all departments of Middle East Technical University, which were selected by stratified sampling method. The results showed that students used their mobile phones primarily for communication and interaction, and then for getting/searching for information. To predict the contribution of the personal factors on the total MPUAE scores, a hierarchical regression analysis was performed. The findings revealed that personal factors, except self-directed learning, significantly predicted students’ total MPUAE scores, which explained 32% of the variance in educational mobile phone use. Specifically, the motives of mobile phone use and self-efficacy beliefs were the most notable predictors based on the analysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data are available upon reasonable request.
References
Ahmad, T. (2019). Mobile phone messaging to increase communication and collaboration within the university community. Library Hi Tech News, 36(8), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-08-2019-0054
Ahn, S. K. (2018). Korean EFL college students' acceptance and use of smartphone applications for English language learning (Order No. 10794038) [Doctoral of education, Alliant International University]. ProQuest
Al-Adwan, A. S., Al-Adwan, A., & Berger, H. (2018). Solving the mystery of mobile learning adoption in higher education. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 16(1), 24–49. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMC.2018.088271
Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2018). Technology acceptance model in m-learning context: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 125, 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.008
Almatari, A. Y., Iahad, N. A., & Balaid, A. S. (2013). Factors influencing students’ intention to use m-learning. Journal of Information Systems Research and Innovation (JISRII), 5, 1–8.
Almaiah, M. A., Alamri, M. M., & Al-Rahmi, W. (2019). Applying the UTAUT model to explain the students’ acceptance of mobile learning system in higher education. IEEE Access, 7, 174673–174686. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2957206
Ally, M. (2009). Mobile learning transforming: The delivery of education and training. Athabasca University Press.
Al-Rahmi, A. M., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alturki, U., Aldraiweesh, A., Almutairy, S., & Al-Adwan, A. S. (2022). Acceptance of mobile technologies and M-learning by university students: An empirical investigation in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7805–7826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10934-8
Altıntaş, A. (2012). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin web 2.0 kullanım amaçları ve eğilimlerinin belirlenmesi [Determination of primary school students’ web 2.0 usage purposes and tendencies] [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Hacettepe University, Ankara. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=2MOln4aKq9cYoOp8ngYeAQ&no=78q7HH1MQFZgSZ5NgE1AqQ
Badwelan, A., & Bahaddad, A. A. (2017). Cultural factors that influence M-learning for female university students: A Saudi Arabian case study. International Journal of Computer Applications, 166(5), 21–32.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00024
BankMyCell (2022) How many smartphones are in the world? https://www.bankmycell.com/blog/how-many-phones-are-in-the-world.
Barker, A., Krull, G. and Mallinson, B. (2005). A proposed theoretical model for m- learning adoption in developing countries. in Proceedings of the 4th World Conference on mLearning. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7766/1f9fcc6291271be7728a886ee62c3409a7ec.pdf?_ga=2.254077838.788599988.1565843011-2024224793.1523949041.
Bilü, H. (2017). Exploring the relationship between college students’ mobile phone affinity and their mobile phone usage [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Middle East Technical University. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=mM0jyRQYt6IzB10fCMxBxA&no=BJeVRF124qzDzTCm9w-RIQ
Bock, B. C., Lantini, R., Thind, H., Walaska, K., Rosen, R. K., Fava, J. L., & Scot Sheldon, L. A. (2016). The mobile phone affinity scale: Enhancement and refinement. Jmir mHealth and uHealth. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.6705
Bomhold, C. R. (2013). Educational use of smart phone technology: A survey of mobile phone application use by undergraduate university students. Program Electronic Library and Information Systems, 47(4), 424–436. https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-01-2013-0003
Bouhnik, D., & Deshen, M. (2014). WhatsApp goes to school: Mobile instant messaging between teachers and students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 13(1), 217–231.
Bryant, E.C., (2016). Graduate student perceptions of multi-modal tablet use in academic environments [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of South Florida. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/154477153.pdf
Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9
Caudill, J. G. (2007). The growth of m-learning and the growth of mobile computing: Parallel developments. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 8(2), 1–13.
Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M., & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers and Education, 59(3), 1054–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.015
Choi, S., Jang, Y., & Kim, H. (2023). Exploring factors influencing students’ intention to use intelligent personal assistants for learning. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2194927
Chung, H. H., Chen, S. C., & Kuo, M. H. (2015). A study of EFL college students’ acceptance of mobile learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.479
Ciampa, K. (2014). Learning in a mobile age: An investigation of student motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12036
Clifton, A., & Mann, C. (2011). Can YouTube enhance student nurse learning? Nurse Education Today, 31(4), 311–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.10.004
Clough, G., Jones, A. C., McAndrew, P., & Scanlon, E. (2007). Informal learning with PDAs and smartphones. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(5), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00268.x
Clough, G., Jones, A., McAndrew, P., & Scanlon, E. (2009). Informal learning in online communities of mobile devices enthusiasts. In M. Ally (Ed.), Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training (pp. 100–112). Athabasca University Press.
Cochrane, T. (2013). A summary and critique of m-learning practice. In Z. L. Berge & L. Y. Muilenburg (Eds.), Handbook of mobile learning (pp. 24–34). Florence, KY: Routledge.
Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/249688
ComScore (2012). Argentina ranks first in worldwide desktop social networking engagement at nearly 10 hours per visitor each month. comScore Media Metrix, November 2012. http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Press_Releases/2012/12/Argentina_Ranks_First_in_Worldwide_Desktop_Social_Networking_Engagement
Criollo-C, S., Guerrero-Arias, A., Jaramillo-Alcázar, Á., & Luján-Mora, S. (2021). Mobile learning technologies for education: Benefits and pending issues. Applied Sciences, 11(9), 4111. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094111
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
Cudeck, R., & Browne, M. W. (1983). Cross-validation of covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18(2), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1802_2
Dahlstrom, E., Dziuban, C., and Walker, J. (2013), ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology 2013, EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research, Louisville, CO
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Dunkerly-Bean, J. M., & Crompton, H. (2016). The role of mobile learning in promoting literacy and human rights for women and girls. In B. Guzzetti (Ed.), Handbook of research on the societal impact of digital media (pp. 581–608). UK: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8310-5.ch023
Fabian, K., Topping, K. J., & Barron, I. G. (2016). Mobile technology and mathematics: Effects on students’ attitudes, engagement, and achievement. Journal of Computers in Education, 3, 77–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0048-8
Fantinelli, S., & Cortini, M. (2018). Informational power and perceived collective benefit affecting the users’ preference for a mobile technology: Evidences from a survey study. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 898. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00898
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using by SPSS (3rd ed.). Sage Publication.
Ford, J. R. (2016). Learners' Perspectives on How Mobile Computing Devices Usage Interacts with Their Learning (Order No. 10168369). [Doctoral dissertation, Northcentral University]. ProQuest
Frankel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). The MCGraw-Hill Companies. Inc.
Global Games Market Report (2020) https://newzoo.com/insights/rankings/top-countries-by-smartphone-penetration-and-users. Accessed: 2022-06-09
Gosper, M., Malfroy, J., McKenzie, J., & Rankine, L. (2011). Students’ engagement with technologies: Implications for university practice: Changing demands, changing directions. Proceedings Ascilite Hobart, 504–508. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/hobart11/procs/Gosper-concise.pdf
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall Inc.
Hargittai, E., & Hinnant, A. (2008). Digital inequality: differences in young adults’ use of the internet. Communication Research, 35(5), 602–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208321782
Heflin, H., Shewmaker, J., & Nguyen, J. (2017). Impact of mobile technology on student attitudes, engagement, and learning. Computers & Education, 107, 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.006
Hu, L. H., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Huang, R. T., Jang, S. J., Machtmes, K., & Deggs, D. (2012). Investigating the roles of perceived playfulness, resistance to change and self-management of learning in mobile English learning outcome. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 1004–1015. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01239.x
Jackson, L. A., Zhao, Y., Qiu, W., Kolenic, A., III., Fitzgerald, H. E., Harold, R., & von Eye, A. (2008). Culture, gender and information technology use: A comparison of Chinese and US children. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2817–2829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.04.007
Junco, R., & Mastrodicasa, J. (2007). Connecting to the next generation: What higher education professionals need to know about today’s students. National Association of Student Personnel Administrators.
Junco, R. (2013). Comparing actual and self-reported measures of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 626–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.007
Junco, R. (2015). Student class standing, Facebook use, and academic performance. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 36, 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.001
Kang, S., & Jung, J. (2014). Mobile communication for human needs: A comparison of smartphone use between the US and Korea. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 376–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.024
Keengwe, J., Schnellert, G., & Jonas, D. (2014). Mobile phones in education: Challenges and opportunities for learning. Education and Information Technologies, 19, 441–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9235-7
Kibona, L., & Mgaya, G. (2015). Smartphones’ Effects on Academic Performance of Higher Learning Students. Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology, 2(4), 3159–3240.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., III., & Swanson, R. A. (2005). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. Elsevier.
Koole, M.L. (2006). The framework for the rational analysis of mobile education (FRAME) model: an evaluation of mobile devices for distance education [Doctoral dissertation, Athabasca University]. http://hdl.handle.net/2149/543
Koole, M.L. (2009). A Model for Framing Mobile Learning. In M. Ally (Ed.), Mobile Learning: Transforming the Delivery of Education & Training (pp. 25-47). Athabasca: AU Press.
Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2008.11772116
Kuznekoff, J. H., & Titsworth, S. (2013). The impact of mobile phone usage on student learning. Communication Education, 62(3), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2013.767917
Lauricella, S., & Kay, R. (2013). Exploring the use of text and instant messaging in higher education classrooms. Research in Learning Technology. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.19061
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4
Liaw, S. S., Huang, H. M., & Chen, G. D. (2007). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1066–1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.001
Lockhart, K. S. (2016). A comparison of the attitudes of administrators and teachers on cell phone use as an educational tool (Order No. 10075104). [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Southern Mississippi]. ProQuest
Looi, C. K., Wong, L., Hyo-Jeong, S., Seow, P., Toh, Y., Chen, W., & Norris, C. (2009). Anatomy of a mobilized lesson: Learning my way. Computers & Education, 53, 1120–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.021
Lowenthal, J. N. (2010). Using mobile learning: Determinates impacting behavioral intention. The American Journal of Distance Education, 24(4), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2010.519947
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley.
Moran, M., Seaman, J., & Tinti-Kane, H. (2011). Teaching, learning, and sharing: How today's higher education faculty use social media. Babson Survey Research Group. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED535130
Moreira, F., Ferreira, M. J., Pereira, C. S., & Durão, N. (2016). Collaborative Learning Supported by Mobile Devices: A Case Study in Portuguese High Education Institutions. In Á. Rocha, A. Correia, H. Adeli, L. Reis, & M. Mendonça Teixeira (Eds.), New Advances In Information Systems And Technologies. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31307-8_16
McVay, M. (2000). Developing a web-based distance student orientation to enhance student success in an online bachelor’s degree completion program. Unpublished practicum report presented to the EdD program, Nova Southeastern University, Florida.
McVay, M. (2001). How to be a successful distance learning: Reflections on the experience of study. Kogan Page.
Najmi, A. & Lee, J. (2009). Why and how mobile learning can make a difference in the K-16 classroom. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2009 (pp. 2903–2910). http://www.editlib.Org/p/31081.
Ng, S. F., Hassan, N. S. I. C., Nor, N. H. M., & Malek, N. A. A. (2017). The relationship between smartphone use and academic performance: A case of students in a Malaysian tertiary institution. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(4), 58–70.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Traxler, J., & Vosloo, S. (2014). Introduction: The prospects for mobile learning. Prospects, 44(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-014-9296-z
O’Bannon, B. W., Lubke, J. K., Beard, J. L., & Britt, V. G. (2011). Using podcasts to replace lecture: Effects on student achievement. Computers & Education, 57, 1885–1892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.001
Obringer, J., & Coffey, K. (2007). Cell phones in American high schools: A national survey. The Journal of Technology Studies, 33, 41–47.
Oblinger, D., & Oblinger, J. (2005). Is It Age or IT: First Steps towards Understanding the Netgeneration. In D. Oblinger & J. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the Net Generation (pp. 1–220). EDUCAUSE.
Ott, T., Magnusson, A. G., Weilenmann, A., & Hård af Segerstad, Y. (2018). “It must not disturb, it’s as simple as that”: Students’ voices on mobile phones in the infrastructure for learning in Swedish upper secondary school. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 517–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9615-0
Quinn, C. (2013a). Mobile learning. In the really useful eLearning instruction manual: Your toolkit for putting eLearning into practice. Wiley and Sons.
Quinn, C. (2013b). The really useful eLearning instruction manual. In R. Hubbard (Ed.), Mobile learning (pp. 147–174). Chichester, UK: Wiley and Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118375860.ch9
Oulasvirta, A., Rattenbury, T., Ma, L., & Raita, E. (2012). Habits make smartphone use more pervasive. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(1), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0412-2
Pauley, D. C. (2015). Selected student characteristics related to academic cell phone use (Order No. 3739991) [Doctoral dissertation, East Tennessee State University]. ProQuest
Peters, K. (2007). m-Learning: Positioning educators for a mobile, connected future. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v8i2.350
Pew Research Center (2021, April) Mobile fact sheet. Report, Pew Research. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/
Pierroux, P. (2008). Extending meaning from museum visits through the use of wikis and mobile blogging. Proceedings of ICLS 2008: International Conference for the Learning Sciences: Vol. 3 (pp. 331–332). The International Society of the Learning Sciences. Google Scholar
Pike, G. R., Hansen, M. J., & Lin, C. H. (2011). Using instrumental variables to account for selection effects in research on first-year programs. Research in Higher Education, 52, 194–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-010-9188-x
Pollara, P., (2011). Mobile learning in higher education: a glimpse and a comparison of student and faculty, readiness, attitudes, and perceptions (Order No. 29119765) [Doctoral dissertation, East Tennessee State University]. ProQuest.
Poong, Y. S., Yamaguchi, S., & Takada, J. I. (2017). Investigating the drivers of mobile learning acceptance among young adults in the World Heritage town of Luang Prabang Laos. Information Development, 33(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666916638136
Ragnedda, M. (2018). Conceptualizing digital capital. Telematics and Informatics, 35(8), 2366–2375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.10.006
Rosen, L. D., Whaling, K., Carrier, L. M., Cheever, N. A., & Rokkum, J. (2013). The media and technology usage and attitudes scale: An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2501–2511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.006
Sawaya, S. F. (2015). Learner perspectives on learning using smartphones (Order No. 3739924). [Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University]. ProQuest
Salehan, M., & Negahban, A. (2013). Social networking on smartphones: When mobile phones become addictive. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2632–2639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.003
Sharples, M., Lonsdale, P., Meek, J., Rudman, P. D.Vavoula, G. N. (2007) An Evaluation of MyArtSpace: a Mobile Learning Service for School Museum Trips. In: Norman, A. and Pearce, J. (eds.), Proceedings of 6th Annual Conference on Mobile Learning, mLearn 2007(pp.238–244). Melbourne: University of Melbourne
Song, Y. (2007). Educational uses of handheld devices: What are the consequences? TechTrends, 51(5), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-007-0068-y
Song, Y., & Fox, R. (2008). Using PDA for undergraduate student incidental vocabulary testing. ReCALL, 20(3), 290–314. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344008000438
Suki, N. M., & Suki, N. M. (2007). Mobile phone usage for m-learning: comparing heavy and light mobile phone users. Campus-Wide Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650740710835779
Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Allyn and Bacon.
Thompson, B. (2008). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications (3rd ed.). American Psychological Association.
Tsai, M. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2003). Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: The role of Internet self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1355800032000038822
Usluel Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Liu, T.-C. (2015). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008
Wai, I. S. H., Ng, S. S. Y., Chiu, D. K. W., Ho, K. K. W., & Lo, P. (2018). Exploring undergraduate students’ usage pattern of mobile apps for education. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 50(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000616662699
Wang, Y. S., Wu, M. C., & Wang, H. Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00809
Weiser, E. B. (2000). Gender differences in internet use patterns and internet application preferences: a two-sample comparison. Cyber Psychol. Behav., 3, 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493100316012
van Dijk, J., & van Deursen, A. (2010). Inequalities of digital skills and how to overcome them. In Handbook of research on overcoming digital divides: Constructing an equitable and competitive information society (pp. 278–291). IGI Global. doi: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-699-0.ch015
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Voicu, M. C., & Muntean, M. (2023). Factors that influence mobile learning among university students in Romania. Electronics, 12(4), 938. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12040938
Yasan-Ak, N., & Yıldırım, S. (2022). The development and validation of a scale measuring mobile phone use in an academic environment. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 9(4), 931–948. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.946609
Yurdugül, H., & Sarikaya, D. A. (2013). The scale of online learning readiness: A study of validity and reliability. Egitim Ve Bilim [education and Science], 38(169), 391–406.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Lebeau, R. B. (2000). Zimmerman, B. J., & Lebeau, R. B. (2000). A commentary on self-directed learning. Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions, 299–313. Google Scholar
Funding
There are no sources of funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors have contributed significantly to be credited as authors according to the listed guidelines and are in agreement about the same.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors declare none.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.”
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This paper is a part of my PhD dissertation.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yasan-Ak, N., Yildirim, S. An Investigation into Smartphone Use of Undergraduate Students in the Academic Environment and Its Predictors. Tech Know Learn (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09723-0
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09723-0