Abstract
Inferencing is an important and complex process required for successful reading comprehension. Previous research has suggested instruction in inferencing is effective at improving reading comprehension. However, varying definitions of inferencing is likely impacting how inferencing instruction is implemented in practice and inferencing ability is measured. The goal of this study was, first, to systematically review the literature on inference instruction to compile a list of definitions used to describe inferences, and second, to review textbooks used in instruction and assessments used in research and practice to measure inferencing skills. A systematic literature search identified studies that implemented inferencing instruction with learners across all ages from preschool to adults. After screening and elimination, 75 studies were identified and reviewed for inference definitions, instructional practices, and assessments used. A widely-used reading textbook and two reading comprehension assessments were reviewed for grade 4 (elementary school) and grade 7 (middle school) to connect inferences taught and measured with the identified definitions. Reviewing the 75 studies suggested 3 broad categories of inferences and 9 definitions of specific inference types. Textbook and assessment review processes revealed differences between the types of inference questions practiced and tested. The large variation in inference types and definitions may create difficulties in schools implementing inference instruction and/or attempting to measure students’ inference abilities. More alignment between research studies on inference instruction and the textbooks and assessments used in schools to teach and assess inference skills is needed.



Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Applegate, M. D., Quinn, K. B., & Applegate, A. (2002). Levels of thinking required by comprehension questions in informal reading inventories. The Reading Teacher, 56, 174–180.
Beerwinkle, A. L., Owens, J., & Hudson, A. (2021). An analysis of comprehension strategies and skills covered within grade 3–5 reading textbooks in the United States. Technology, Knowledge, and Learning, 26(2), 311–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09484-0
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. V. (1999). Inference making and its relation to comprehension failure. Reading and Writing, 11, 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008084120205
Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., Barnes, M. A., & Bryant, P. E. (2001). Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge. Memory and Cognition, 29(6), 850–859. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196414
Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., & Bryant, P. E. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 671–681. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31
Clinton, V., Taylor, T., Bajpayee, S., Davison, M. L., Carlson, S. E., & Seipel, B. (2020). Inferential comprehension differences between narrative and expository texts: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 33, 2223–2248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10044-2
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Retrieved from: https://learning.ccsso.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/ELA_Standards1.pdf
Dewitz, P., Jones, J., & Leahy, S. (2009). Comprehension strategy instruction in core reading programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(2), 102–126. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.44.2.1
Elleman, A. M. (2017). Examining the impact of inference instruction on the literal and inferential comprehension of skilled and less skilled readers: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 761–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000180
Gauche, G., & Pfeiffer Flores, E. (2022). The role of inferences in reading comprehension: A critical analysis. Theory and Psychology, 32(2), 326–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543211043805
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371
Hall, C. S. (2016). Inference instruction for struggling readers: A synthesis of intervention research. Educational Psychology Review, 28(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9295-x
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. (2023). About us. https://www.hmhco.com/about-us. Retrieved on June 2, 2023.
Jones, J. S., Conradi, K., & Amendum, S. J. (2016). Matching interventions to reading needs: A case for differentiation. The Reading Teacher, 70(3), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1513
Kendeou, P. (2015). A general inference skill. In E. J. O’Brien, A. E. Cook, & R. F. Lorch (Eds.), Inferences during reading (pp. 160 –181). Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107279186.009
Kendeou, P., Bohn-Gettler, C., White, M., & van den Broek, P. (2008). Children’s inference generation across different media. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.00370.x
Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J. (2017). Formal and informal measures of reading comprehension. In S. E. Israel (Ed.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension 2nd ed. (pp. 427–451). Routledge.
MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K., & Dreyer, L. G. (2002). Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests. 4th ed. Riverside Publishing.
Mar, R. A., Li, J., Nguyen, A. T., & Ta, C. P. (2021). Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 28, 732–749. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01853-1
Nash, H., & Heath, J. (2011). The role of vocabulary, working memory and inference making ability in reading comprehension in Down syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(5), 1782–1791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.03.007
Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016). Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
Perfetti, C. A., & Stafura, J. Z. (2015). Comprehending implicit meanings in text without making inferences. In E. J. O’Brien, A. E. Cook, & R. F. Lorch (Eds.), Inferences during reading (pp. 1–18). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107279186.002
Schmidt, W. H., & McKnight, C. C. (2012). Inequality for all. Teachers College Press.
Schwartz, S. (2019). The most popular reading programs aren’t backed by science. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/the-most-popular-reading-programs-arent-backed-by-science/2019/12.
Texas Education Agency (2022). STAAR released test questions. Retrieved from: https://tea.texas.gov/student-assessment/testing/staar/staar-released-test-questions.
Texas Education Agency (2017). Texas essential knowledge and skills for English language arts and reading. Retrieved from: https://tea.texas.gov/about-tea/laws-and-rules/texas-administrative-code/19-tac-chapter-110.
van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press.
Wijekumar, K. K., Meyer, B. J., & Lei, P. (2017). Web-based text structure strategy instruction improves seventh graders’ content area reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 741. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000168
Funding
The research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through grant U423A180074 to Texas A&M University. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Rice, M., Wijekumar, K., Lambright, K. et al. Inferencing in Reading Comprehension: Examining Variations in Definition, Instruction, and Assessment. Tech Know Learn 29, 1169–1190 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09660-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09660-y


