Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Effect of Problem-Based Learning Method Supported by Web 2.0 Tools on Academic Achievement and Critical Thinking Skills in Teacher Education

  • Original research
  • Published:
Technology, Knowledge and Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Designing learning and teaching processes in line with technology and contemporary approaches in knowledge societies, in which the twenty-first century skills gain importance, is considered as a necessity for the development of lifelong learners. In order to train individuals equipped with higher order thinking skills such as problem-solving, critical and creative thinking, the teachers are also expected to possess these skills. The study discusses the impact of teacher training programmes within this context. The purpose of the study is to determine the effect of problem-based learning method supported by Web 2.0 tools on teacher candidates’ academic success levels and critical thinking skills. In addition, identifying the views of teacher candidates in the experiment group was also targeted. A total of 72 teacher candidates, studying at the Faculty of Education of a private university, took part in the study. In the study designed with experimental design with pre-test-post-test control group, the participants were selected with random method and placed in groups accordingly. The implementation was carried out during the assessment and evaluation course. The study is limited with the applications of quizizz, mindmeister and padlet among Web 2.0 tools. Each application is preferred for a different purpose. The implementation period of the study lasted for a total of 10 weeks. The study employs a mixed method approach in which qualitative and quantitative methods used together. While the academic achievement levels of teacher candidates for the assessment and evaluation course are determined by the “academic achievement test for the assessment and evaluation course”, their critical thinking skills are determined by the “critical thinking standards scale for the teacher candidates”. The views of the teacher candidates about the applications were determined by the qualitative data obtained from the “interview form”. In the study, between the experimental group in which the problem-based learning method supported by Web 2.0 tools are employed and the control group in which the traditional methods are used, a significant difference was identified in favour of the experimental group in the academic achievement levels for the course. In a similar line, problem-based learning method supported by Web 2.0 tools has been found to be effective in developing teacher candidates’ critical thinking skills. At the end of 10  weeks, it is identified that the teacher candidates in the experimental group were pleased with the activities and had positive opinions about the applications. Teacher candidates stated that through the acquisition of higher-level behaviours, they felt themselves ready for the teaching profession and their skills for learning to learn were improved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aksoy, E., & Gözütok, F. D. (2017). Comparative analysis of different teacher education programs and paradigms. Elementary Education Online, 16(4), 1672–1688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkhayat, L., Ernest, J., & LaChenaye, J. (2020). Exploring Kuwaiti preservice early childhood teachers’ beliefs about using Web 2.0 technologies. Early Childhood Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01036-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almekhlafi, A. G., & Abulibdeh, E. S. A. (2018). K-12 teachers’ perceptions of Web 2.0 applications in the United Arab Emirates? Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 15(3), 238–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • An, Y. J., Aworuwa, B., Ballard, G., & Williams, K. (2010). Teaching with Web 2.0 technologies: Benefits, barriers and best practices. Retrieved from https://members.aect.org/pdf/Proceedings/…/2009/09_1.pdf. Accessed 26 Jun 2018.

  • Aybek, B., Aslan, S., Dinçer, S., & Arısoy, B. C. (2015). Critical thinking standards scale for the teacher candidates: Study of validity and reliability. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 21(1), 25–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingimlas, K. A. (2017). Learning and teaching with web 2.0 applications in Saudi K-12 schools. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(3), 100–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borhan, M. T. (2014). Problem based learning (PBL) in teacher education: A review of the effect of PBL on pre-service teachers’ knowledge and skills. European Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(1), 76–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos, B., & Lee, K. S. (2013). Problem-based instruction and Web 2.0: Meeting the needs of the 21st century learner. Conference: Society of Instructional Technology and Education. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268819024. Accessed 20 Jun 2018.

  • Budaghyan, S. (2015). Technology teacher training in a remote region of Armenia. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 197–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caliskan, S., Guney, Z., Sakhieva, R. G., Vasbieva, D. G., & Zaitseva, N. A. (2019). Teachers’ views on the availability of Web 2.0 tools in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(22), 70–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coutinho, C. P. (2008). Web 2.0 tools in pre-service teacher education programs: An example from Portugal. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/55609551.pdf. Accessed 3 Jul 2018.

  • Elmas, R., & Geban, Ö. (2012). Web 2.0 tools for 21st century teachers. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(1), 243–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdogan, T., & Senemoglu, N. (2014). Problem-based learning in teacher education: Its promises and challenges. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 459–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faboya, O. T., & Adamu, B. J. (2017). Integrating Web 2.0 tools into teaching and learning process through mobile device technology in Nigerian schools: Current status and future directions. International Journal of Education and Research, 5(5), 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firat, E. A., & Köksal, M. S. (2019). Effects of instruction supported by web 2.0 tools on prospective teachers’ biotechnology literacy. Computers & Education, 135, 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, D. G. (2019). Predicting Web 2.0 use among US teens—Expanding the power of the skill, will and tool model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3405–3419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gündüz, A. Y., Alemdağ, E., Yaşar, S., & Erdem, M. (2016). Design of a problem-based online learning environment and evaluation of its effectiveness. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3), 49–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halili, S. H. (2018). Emerging trends of web 2.0 tools in adult education. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 6(2), 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatısaru, V. (2015). Investigating student growth in problem based learning treatment mathematics classes. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 14(2), 459–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennissen, P., Beckers, H., & Moerkerke, G. (2017). Linking practice to theory in teacher education: A growth in cognitive structures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 314–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussin, W. N. T. W., Harun, J., & Shukor, N. A. (2019). Problem based learning to enhance students critical thinking skill via online tools. Asian Social Science, 15(1), 14–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismail, N. S., Harun, J., Zakaria, M. A. Z. M., & Salleh, S Md. (2018). The effect of mobile problem-based learning application DicScience PBL on students’ critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28, 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, E. M., Mainhard, T., Buisman, R. S. M., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Heijltjes, Anita E. G., Van Peppen, L. M., et al. (2019). Training higher education teachers’ critical thinking and attitudes towards teaching it. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 310–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katitia, D. M. O. (2015). Teacher education preparation program for the 21st century. Which way forward for Kenya? Journal of Education and Practice, 6(24), 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavanoz, S., Yüksel, H. G., & Ozcan, E. (2015). Pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy perceptions on web pedagogical content knowledge. Computers & Education, 85, 94–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, A. A., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2017). Examining the role of Web 2.0 tools in supporting problem solving during case-based instruction. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(3–4), 182–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kompen, R. T., Edirisingha, P., Canaleta, X., Alsina, M., & Monguet, J. M. (2019). Personal learning Environments based on Web 2.0 services in higher education. Telematics and Informatics, 38, 194–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korucu, A. T., & Çakır, H. (2018). The effect of dynamic web technologies on student academic achievement in problem-based collaborative learning environment. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 6(1), 92–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurt, A. A., Sarsar, F., Filiz, O., Telli, E., Orhan-Göksün, D., & Bardakcı, S. (2019). Teachers’ use of Web 2.0: Education bag project experiences. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(4), 110–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusuma, E. D., Gunarhadi, G., & Riyadi, R. (2018). The strategies to improve critical thinking skills through problem-based quantum learning model at primary school. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 5(4), 123–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loyens, S. M. M., Jones, S. H., Mikkers, J., & Gog, T. V. (2015). Problem-based learning as a facilitator of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 38, 34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahapatra, S. (2015). Using Web 2.0 tools for teacher professional development: A case study. Innovation in English Language Teacher Education. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316692493. Accessed 2 Jul 2018.

  • Major, T., & Mulvihill, T. M. Dr. (2018). Problem-based learning pedagogies in teacher education: The case of Botswana. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 12(1), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinina, I. A. (2016). Implementing web 2.0 tools for collaborative work of learners studying English. The New Educational Review, 1(43), 104–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mindmeister. https://www.mindmeister.com.

  • Moshahid, M., & Pt, A. (2017). A study on awareness of web 2.0 resources in education among B.ed students. International Journal of Academic Research and Development, 2(3), 158–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, T. (2007). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. MPRA paper no. 4578, posted 07. November 2007/04:01. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/4578/. Accessed 2 Jul 2018.

  • Olea, M. D. (2019). Application of Web 2.0 tools in teaching 21st-century students in higher education in Calabarzon, Philippines. Ioer International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 1(1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özçınar, H., & Deryakulu, D. (2011). The effects of reflection points in video-cases and teacher participation in online discussion groups on reflective thinking. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 40, 321–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padlet. https://padlet.com.

  • Perikos, I., Grivokostopoulou, F., Kovas, K., & Hatzilygeroudis, I. (2015). Assisting tutors to utilize web 2.0 tools in education. International conference e-learning. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED562502.pdf. Accessed 22 Jun 2018.

  • Quizizz. https://quizizz.com.

  • Rani, A. (2017). Problems and solution of teacher education. Academic Research in Education and Review, 5(1), 15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathakrishnan, M., Ahmad, R., & Suan, C. L. (2017). Online discussion: Enhancing students’ critical thinking skills. In The 2nd international conference on applied science and technology 2017 (ICAST’17) AIP conferences proceedings 1891, 020120-1–020120-7. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5005453.

  • Roberts-Hull, K., Jensen, B., & Cooper, S. (2015). A new approach: Teacher education reform. Melbourne: Learning First.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sailin, S. N., & Mahmor, N. A. (2016). Promoting meaningful learning through create-share-collaborate. Proceeding of ICECRS, 1, 335–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C. L. (2015). The futures of learning 3: What kind of pedagogies for the 21st century? UNESCO Education Research and Foresight, Paris. ERF working papers series, no. 15.

  • Shah, S. A. (2013). Making the teacher relevant and effective in a technology-led teaching and learning environment. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 612–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tambouris, E., Panopoulou, E., Tarabanis, K., Ryberg, T., Buus, L., Peristeras, V., et al. (2012). Enabling problem based learning through Web 2.0 technologies: PBL 2.0. Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 238–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarman, B. (2010). Global perspectives and challenges on teacher education in Turkey. International Journal of Arts and Sciences, 3(17), 78–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatli, Z., Akbulut, H. I., & Altinisik, D. (2019). Changing attitudes towards educational technology usage in classroom: Web 2.0 tools. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(2), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tudor Car, L., Kyaw, B. M., Dunleavy, G., Smart, N. A., Semwal, M., Rotgans, J. I., et al. (2019). Digital problem-based learning in health professions: Systematic review and meta-analysis by the digital health education collaboration. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.2196/12945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulu Kalın, Ö., & Birişçi, S. (2018). The metaphorical perceptions of teacher candidates on the concept of “Web 2.0 Technology”. Review of International Geographical Education Online (RIGEO), 8(3), 542–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ünal, E., & Çakır, H. (2017). Students’ views about the problem based collaborative learning environment supported by dynamic web technologies. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller, A. (2013). The use of Web 2.0 technology for pre-service teacher learning in science education. Research in Teacher Education, 3(2), 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widyasari, Y. D. L., Nugroho, L. E., & Permanasari, A. E. (2019). Persuasive technology for enhanced learning behavior in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(15), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yücel, Ü. A. (2017). Perceptions of pedagogical formation students about Web 2.0 tools and educational practices. Education and Information Technologies, 22, 1571–1585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cigdem Hursen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hursen, C. The Effect of Problem-Based Learning Method Supported by Web 2.0 Tools on Academic Achievement and Critical Thinking Skills in Teacher Education. Tech Know Learn 26, 515–533 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09458-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09458-2

Keywords

Navigation