Technology, Knowledge and Learning

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 199–221 | Cite as

Media and Technology in Preschool Classrooms: Manifesting Prosocial Sharing Behaviours When Using iPads

Original research


This empirical case study investigated prosocial sharing behaviours when using media and technology, i.e., iPads. The following research questions were explored: (1) How do prosocial behaviours of sharing manifest among preschool-aged children interacting with iPads? (2) What are the effects of iPad use on the manifestation of prosocial sharing behaviours among preschool-aged children? The study is grounded in social exchange and social learning theories. It employed a mixed methods approach with design-based research (DBR) and video ethnography. This paper focuses on a field study group (n = 3) (4 years old) and one teacher in an early childhood education (ECE) setting. Activities with and without iPads were tested. Data were analyzed using qualitative open-thematic coding methods and quantitative statistical methods. Results indicated that incidents of prosocial behaviours occurred more often than nonsocial or antisocial behaviours. This research can influence changes in ECE curriculum and policy to include more digital integration.


Early childhood education Technology iPads Prosocial behaviours Preschool Design-based research 


  1. Alper, M. (2013). Developmentally appropriate new media literacies: Supporting cultural competencies and social skills in early childhood education. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 13(2), 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). (2014). The benefits of limiting TV. Retrieved October 15, 2014 from
  3. Amiel, T., & Reeves, T. C. (2008). Design-based research and educational technology: Rethinking technology and the research agenda. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 11(4), 29–40.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Belacchi, C., & Farina, E. (2012). Feeling and thinking of others: Affective and cognitive empathy and emotion comprehension in prosocial/hostile preschoolers. Aggressive Behavior, 38(2), 150–165. Scholar
  6. Bergin, C., Bergin, D., & French, E. (1995). Preschoolers’ prosocial repertoires: Parent perspectives. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 10, 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berkowitz, A. D. (2004). The social norms approach: Theory, research, and annotated bibliography. Retrieved September 14, 2016 from
  8. Beschorner, B., & Hutchison, A. (2013). iPads as a literacy teaching tool in early childhood. Education Publications, 26, 16–24.Google Scholar
  9. Bierhoff, H.-W. (2002). Prosocial behaviour. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  10. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Bouchard, C., Coutu, S., Bigras, N., Lemay, L., Cantin, G., Bouchard, M.-C., et al. (2015). Perceived, expressed and observed prosociality among four-year-old girls and boys in childcare centres. Early Child Development and Care, 185(1), 44–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brownell, C. A., Iesue, S. S., Nichols, S. R., & Svetlova, M. (2013). Mine or yours? Development of sharing in toddlers in relation to ownership understanding. Child Development, 84(3), 906–920. Scholar
  13. Brownell, C. A., Svetlova, M., & Nichols, S. R. (2009). To share or not to share: When do toddlers respond to another’s needs? Infancy, 14(1), 117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chernyak, N., & Kushnir, T. (2013). Giving preschoolers choice increases sharing behavior. Psychological Science, 24(10), 1971–1979. Scholar
  15. Cobb, P. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cook, K. S., & Rice, E. (2006). Social exchange theory. In J. DeLamater (Ed.), The handbook of social psychology. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Corp, I. B. M. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics for Mac, version 24. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
  18. Crescenzi, L., Jewitt, C., & Price, S. (2014). The role of touch in preschool children’s learning using iPad versus paper interaction. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 37(2), 86–95.Google Scholar
  19. Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dunfield, K. A. (2014). A construct divided: Prosocial behavior as helping, sharing, and comforting subtypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dunfield, K. A., Kuhlmeier, V. A., O’Connell, L., & Kelley, E. (2011). Examining the diversity of prosocial behavior: Helping, sharing, and comforting in infancy. Infancy, 16(3), 227–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Edwards, C., & Pye, A. (2011). For and against social networking technology. Engineering and Technology, 6(9), 28–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eisenberg, N. (1982). The development of prosocial behavior. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Eisenberg, N., Hofer, C., Sulik, M. J., & Liew, J. (2014). The development of prosocial moral reasoning and a prosocial orientation in young adulthood: Concurrent and longitudinal correlates. Developmental Psychology, 50(1), 58–70. Scholar
  25. Eisenberg-Berg, N. (1981). Relationship of preschool children’s habitual use of space to prosocial, antisocial, and social behaviors. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 138, 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eisenberg-Berg, N., Haake, R., Hand, M., & Sadalla, E. (1979). Effects of instructions concerning ownership of a toy on preschoolers’ sharing and defensive behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 15(4), 460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eivers, A. R., Brendgen, M., Vitaro, F., & Borge, A. I. H. (2012). Concurrent and longitudinal links between children’s and their friends’ antisocial and prosocial behavior in preschool. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(1), 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335–362. Scholar
  29. Etherington, D. (2013). Apple has sold over 8M iPads direct to education worldwide, with more than 1B iTunes U downloads. Retrieved September 8, 2014 from
  30. Fabes, R. A., Hanish, L. D., Martin, C. L., Moss, A., & Reesing, A. (2012). The effects of young children’s affiliations with prosocial peers on subsequent emotionality in peer interactions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30(4), 569–585. Scholar
  31. Feldman, R., Bamberger, E., & Kanat-Maymon, Y. (2013). Parent-specific reciprocity from infancy to adolescence shapes children’s social competence and dialogical skills. Attachment and Human Development, 15(4), 407–423. Scholar
  32. Flewitt, R., Messer, D., & Kucirkova, N. (2014). New directions for early literacy in a digital age: The iPad. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 15(3), 1–22.Google Scholar
  33. Fujisawa, K. K., Kutsukake, N., & Hasegawa, T. (2008). Reciprocity of prosocial behavior in Japanese preschool children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32(2), 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gentile, D. A., Li, D., Khoo, A., Prot, S., & Anderson, C. A. (2014a). Mediators and moderators of long-term effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior: Practice, thinking, and action. Journal of the American Medical Association Pediatrics, 168(5), 450–457. Scholar
  35. Gentile, D. A., Reimer, R. A., Nathanson, A. I., Walsh, D. A., & Eisenmann, J. C. (2014b). Protective effects of parental monitoring of children’s media use: A prospective study. Journal of the American Medical Association Pediatrics, 168(5), 479–484. Scholar
  36. Hartas, D. D. (2011). Children’s language and behavioural, social and emotional difficulties and prosocial behaviour during the toddler years and at school entry. British Journal of Special Education, 38(2), 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hay, D. F., Castle, J., Davies, L., Demetriou, H., & Stimson, C. A. (1999). Prosocial action in very early childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40(6), 905–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hirsh-Pasek, K., Zosh, J. M., Golinkoff, R. M., Gray, J. H., Robb, M. B., & Kaufman, J. (2015). Putting education in “educational” apps lessons from the science of learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(1), 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Homans, G. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  40. Jacobson, M. (2014). Design-based research: Sponsoring innovation in education. Education Canada, 54(5), 22–24.Google Scholar
  41. Kang, H. Y. (2012). Large group meetings in the preschool classroom: Co-constructing meaning making through group interaction (p. 72). Ann Arbor: ProQuest Information & Learning.Google Scholar
  42. Karsenti, T., & Aurélien, F. (2013). The iPad in education: uses, benefits, and challenges: A survey of 6,057 students and 302 teachers in Quebec, Canada. Montreal, QC: CRIFPE.Google Scholar
  43. Liao, Z., Li, Y., & Su, Y. (2014). Emotion understanding and reconciliation in overt and relational conflict scenarios among preschoolers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38(2), 111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lynch, J., & Redpath, T. (2014). ‘Smart’ technologies in early years literacy education: A metanarrative of paradigmatic tensions in iPad use in an Australian preparatory classroom. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 14(2), 147–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McPake, J., Plowman, L., & Stephen, C. (2013). Pre-school children creating and communicating with digital technologies in the home. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 421–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Middleton, J., Gorard, S., Taylor, C., & Ritland, B. (2006). The “compleat” design experiment: From soup to nuts. In A. E. Kelly, R. A. Lesh, & J. Y. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Moore, C., & Macgillivray, S. (2004). Altruism, prudence, and theory of mind in preschoolers. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2004(103), 51–62. Scholar
  48. Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survivial manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (4th ed.). New York, NY: Allen & Unwin Book Publishers.Google Scholar
  49. Paulus, M., Gillis, S., Li, J., & Moore, C. (2013). Preschool children involve a third party in a dyadic sharing situation based on fairness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116(1), 78–85. Scholar
  50. Paulus, M., & Moore, C. (2014). The development of recipient-dependent sharing behavior and sharing expectations in preschool children. Developmental Psychology, 50(3), 914–921. Scholar
  51. Persson, G. E. B. (2005). Developmental perspectives on prosocial and aggressive motives in preschoolers’ peer interactions. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(1), 80–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Piaget, J. (1951). The child’s conception of the world. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  53. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  54. QSR International. (2016). NVivo qualitative data analysis software, version 11. Melbourne: QSR International Pty Ltd.Google Scholar
  55. Radke-Yarrow, M., Zahn-Waxler, C., Barrett, D., Darby, J., King, R., Pickett, M., et al. (1976). Dimensions and correlates of prosocial behavior in young children. Child Development, 47(1), 118–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ramaswamy, V., & Bergin, C. (2009). Do reinforcement and induction increase prosocial behavior? Results of a teacher-based intervention in preschools. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 23(4), 527–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Reimann, P. (2011). Chapter 3 design-based research. In L. Markauskaite, P. Freebody, & J. Irwin (Eds.), Methodological choice and design. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  58. Sommerville, J. A., Schmidt, M. F. H., Yun, J.-E., & Burns, M. (2013). The development of fairness expectations and prosocial behavior in the second year of life. Infancy, 18(1), 40–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  60. Uhls, Y. T., Michikyan, M., Morris, J., Garcia, D., Small, G. W., Zgourou, E., et al. (2014). Five days at outdoor education camp without screens improves preteen skills with nonverbal emotion cues. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 387–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (2006). Educational design research. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. van Geel, M., Vedder, P., & Tanilon, J. (2014). Relationship between peer victimization, cyberbullying, and suicide in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association Pediatrics, 168(5), 435–442. Scholar
  63. Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2013). The emergence of contingent reciprocity in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116(2), 338–350. Scholar
  65. White, N., Ensor, R., Marks, A., Jacobs, L., & Hughes, C. (2014). “It’s mine!” Does sharing with siblings at age 3 predict sharing with siblings, friends, and unfamiliar peers at age 6? Early Education and Development, 25(2), 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yagmurlu, B. (2014). Relations among sociocognitive abilities and prosocial behavior. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23(3), 591–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Curriculum and PedagogyThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations